On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:03:13 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
emerge -vp dev-vcs/git and come up with 194 pkgs that need to be
installed.
emerge -tp dev-vcs/git
should show you what it pulling in which packages, then you can tweak
your USE flags. It is quite possible, even likely, that this is
On Saturday 03 Aug 2013 06:52:46 Harry Putnam wrote:
I was off gentoo for a few mnths... apparently something has changed
in the naming of the network devices.
So far I've read several accounts of it... but the install handbook
has apparently not been brought up to date.
Doing a fresh
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 11:51:31 +0100, Mick wrote:
Can someone point me to concise documentation about how this new setup
is supposed to work?
In /etc/conf.d/net you should replace the previously named eth0
directives to your new NIC name, e.g. instead of:
config_eth0=dhcp
you will
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 08:34:11PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
Again you're wilfully misinterpreting what I've said, and answering a
completely different
point. You didn't know the basics of how to go about approaching Gentoo.
Stuff that
practically every user knows, or can find out
walt w41...@gmail.com writes:
On 07/29/2013 06:29 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Can anyone post a .config for a 3.8.13 kernel that is known to work on
a vbox install of gentoo as guest.
Working on a fresh install but don't have gentoo running anywhere to
rob a .config from.
This one worked for
On 2013-08-03 14:28, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 08:34:11PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
While I (and others BTW) was trying to provide an external POV with
points to make outside contributions and rectruitement more efficient,
you guys @gentoo.org turned this thread into
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com writes:
On Saturday 03 Aug 2013 06:52:46 Harry Putnam wrote:
I was off gentoo for a few mnths... apparently something has changed
in the naming of the network devices.
So far I've read several accounts of it... but the install handbook
has apparently not been
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk writes:
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 11:51:31 +0100, Mick wrote:
Can someone point me to concise documentation about how this new setup
is supposed to work?
In /etc/conf.d/net you should replace the previously named eth0
directives to your new NIC name, e.g.
On 08/03/2013 02:28 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
you guys @gentoo.org turned this thread into plain bullshits.
I have a lot of patience, but that does not help us and definitely not
your case either. Please stop.
People who are _really_ interested in contributing are welcome to
contact me
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com writes:
On 03/08/13 06:03, Harry Putnam wrote:
No doubt suffering from overdose of pilot error here but on a new (in
progress) install of gentoo as guest in vbox. I ran the command
emerge -vp dev-vcs/git and come up with 194 pkgs that need to be
On 3 August 2013, at 04:03, Harry Putnam wrote:
...
emerge -vp dev-vcs/git and come up with 194 pkgs that need to be
installed.
...
So I imagine I've done something thats causing that massive of a list
of dependencies.
I tried a few USE flags like -X and that did drop it down to
On 08/02/2013 08:22 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Now, is it reasonable to install that way? Will I run into some
horrible unsightly mess using git, when installed this way.
Without USE=perl, you'll get a surprise if you try to `git add -i`.
Am Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:22:09 -0400
schrieb Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com:
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com writes:
On 03/08/13 06:03, Harry Putnam wrote:
No doubt suffering from overdose of pilot error here but on a new (in
progress) install of gentoo as guest in vbox. I ran the
Am Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:12:01 +0100
schrieb Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk:
On 31/07/2013 12:31, Marc Joliet wrote:
[snip]
There's also -cpu host, which simply passes your CPU through to the guest.
That's what I use for my 32 bit WinXP VM. You can use it if you don't mind
not
2013/8/3 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com:
Hehe, alright, now we're talking that reduced dependancies to just
1 lonesome cpio.
Now, is it reasonable to install that way? Will I run into some
horrible unsightly mess using git, when installed this way.
IIRC you only have to do USE=-perl
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 03:20:27PM +0200, pk wrote:
On 2013-08-03 14:28, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 08:34:11PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
While I (and others BTW) was trying to provide an external POV with
points to make outside contributions and rectruitement more
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
On 3 August 2013, at 04:03, Harry Putnam wrote:
...
emerge -vp dev-vcs/git and come up with 194 pkgs that need to be
installed.
...
So I imagine I've done something thats causing that massive of a list
of dependencies.
I tried a few USE
Wang Xuerui idontknw.w...@gmail.com writes:
2013/8/3 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com:
Hehe, alright, now we're talking that reduced dependancies to just
1 lonesome cpio.
Now, is it reasonable to install that way? Will I run into some
horrible unsightly mess using git, when installed
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com writes:
On 08/02/2013 08:22 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Now, is it reasonable to install that way? Will I run into some
horrible unsightly mess using git, when installed this way.
Without USE=perl, you'll get a surprise if you try to `git add -i`.
On 03/08/13 04:50, Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
So, anyway, thinking I'll go with
USE=-blksha1 -gpg -iconv -pcre -threads -webdav -cgi
-cvs -doc -emacs -gnome-keyring -gtk -highlight -nls -ppcsha1
-subversion -test -tk -xinetd emerge -v dev-vcs/git
Unless I hear something that would
On 08/02/2013 09:38 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com writes:
On 08/02/2013 08:22 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Now, is it reasonable to install that way? Will I run into some
horrible unsightly mess using git, when installed this way.
Without USE=perl, you'll get
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Unless I hear something that would indicate it will be too crippled
even for the usage I plan.
You should of course put those USE flags in /etc/portage/package.use
instead of setting them in the command-line, otherwise they won't be
On 03/08/13 06:20, Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Unless I hear something that would indicate it will be too crippled
even for the usage I plan.
You should of course put those USE flags in /etc/portage/package.use
instead of setting them in the
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/08/13 06:20, Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Unless I hear something that would indicate it will be too crippled
even for the usage I plan.
You should of course put those
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:18:28 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
acero ~ # du -sh /usr/share/doc
2.5G /usr/share/doc
You will save much more space by using USE=-doc (or perhaps even
adding /usr/share/doc to INSTALL_MASK), than by removing potentially
useful functionality.
USE=-doc will
I see an update to udev come up when investigating installing various
other pkgs. eix shows I'm on 197-r3 and the most recent is 206.
Will that be a hefty amount of change... and concomittant amount of
work? Or something a lazy slug can manage?
On 08/02/2013 07:23 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
I have a long running machine with a local epson usb printer using the
kernel lpusb
Using cups =1.5.2-r4 I can print ... upgrade to 1.6.2-r* and cups cant
see the usb printer. The only errors in the cups log are to do with
systemd service
On 04/08/13 09:42, walt wrote:
On 08/02/2013 07:23 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
I have a long running machine with a local epson usb printer using the
kernel lpusb
Using cups =1.5.2-r4 I can print ... upgrade to 1.6.2-r* and cups cant
see the usb printer. The only errors in the cups log are
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:42:36AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
nope, you just believed all the FUD there has been out there.
i've said it many times, and i'll say it again:
the only real different is USE=rule-generator and that's it
and sys-fs/eudev is constantly out of date and haven't
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 05:02:39AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs/eudev just like
sys-apps/module-init-tools already was removed as unnecessary later on.
You want eudev removed, and Lennart Poettering wants udev on
non-systemd systems dropped. Add those two
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:03:58AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
FUD again. The backwards compability is still all there and udev can be
built standalone and ran standalone.
For how long can it be built standalone? The following FUD brought
to you courtesy of Kay Sievers...
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Steven J. Long wrote:
Again you're wilfully misinterpreting what I've said, and answering a
completely different
point. You didn't know the basics of how to go about approaching Gentoo.
While I (and others BTW)
My point is simply this: there is a world of
32 matches
Mail list logo
