Hi. I am having problems upgrading to apache 2.4.7 from 2.2.26. It
seems mod_perl and mod_python require apache2.4 in their ebuilds.
Anyway to fix this or am I stuck with the apache2.2 series? I was doing
this in my normal upgrade process and I postponed this particular mess
for quite a while,
On 24 Feb 2014 13:43, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am having problems upgrading to apache 2.4.7 from 2.2.26. It
seems mod_perl and mod_python require apache2.4 in their ebuilds.
Anyway to fix this or am I stuck with the apache2.2 series? I was doing
this in my normal upgrade process
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On 24 Feb 2014 13:43, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am having problems upgrading to apache 2.4.7 from 2.2.26. It
seems mod_perl and mod_python require apache2.4 in their ebuilds.
Anyway to fix this or am I stuck with the apache2.2
On 02/23/2014 06:01 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
[ snip ]
Corrupt filesystems or logs?
logs. currently if fsck runs anywhere on boot i get zero log about what
was done, so i prefer to do this on a running system. / is
On 24/02/14 09:31, eroen wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I
On 02/24/2014 02:06 AM, eroen wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:54:07 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile fltk-1.1.10 both using an ebuild from [1] and
with just the downloaded source. I think this version needs libpng
1.2 which is installed in one of the slots.
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:52:13 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
As you can see above, something is forcing (-openrc-force) - any ideas
on how to get it to honour the openrc-force flag or find out what is
causing the problem?
The flag is masked because it is an unsupported option. Unmask it by
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:52:13 +0800, William Kenworthy
bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
moriah ~ # emerge gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-desktop-3.8.4:3/7
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[1] For lack of a better term, let's just call systemd here a system
controller. What is this ONE thing a system controller should do and do
it well?
An init daemon generally
On 24/02/14 18:39, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:52:13 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
As you can see above, something is forcing (-openrc-force) - any ideas
on how to get it to honour the openrc-force flag or find out what is
causing the problem?
The flag is masked because
Hello,
I am trying to install an ebuild that used EAPI=4-python getting the error:
API of python.eclass in EAPI=4-python not established
I googled the problem but there is not much to read (or at least I could
not find much) and what is there is old. So I wonder what is the problem
with this
24.02.2014 16:39, Mark David Dumlao пишет:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[1] For lack of a better term, let's just call systemd here a system
controller. What is this ONE thing a system controller should do
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
24.02.2014 16:39, Mark David Dumlao пишет:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru
wrote:
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[1] For lack of a better term, let's just call systemd
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:30:29 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install an ebuild that used EAPI=4-python getting the
error:
API of python.eclass in EAPI=4-python not established
I googled the problem but there is not much to read (or at least I
could not
On 02/24/2014 04:32 PM, eroen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:30:29 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install an ebuild that used EAPI=4-python getting the
error:
API of python.eclass in EAPI=4-python not established
I googled the problem but there is not much to
On 24-Feb-14 7:27, Facundo Curti wrote:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
writes:
raid1: n
raid0: n*2
But, in real life, the reads from raid 0 doesn't work at all, because if
you use chunk size from 4k, and you need to read just 2kb (most binary
files, txt files,
On 24.02.2014 18:33, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
24.02.2014 16:39, Mark David Dumlao пишет:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru
wrote:
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[1] For
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:49:56 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/24/2014 04:32 PM, eroen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:30:29 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install an ebuild that used EAPI=4-python getting
the error:
API of python.eclass
Thank you all! :) I finally have all clear.
I'm going to do raid 10. Any way, I'm going to do a benchmark before to
install.
Thank you!;)
2014-02-24 14:03 GMT-03:00 Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com:
On 24-Feb-14 7:27, Facundo Curti wrote:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
On 24.02.2014 18:33, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
Sorry but I think I was quite clear:
An init daemon generally does one thing well.
Following a Unix way design, Everything else should be done by something
else.
...
At
On 24.02.2014 22:55, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
[...]
I didn't attribute anything to you you didn't say. It just so happens, though
that there is a context to this conversation, which, if you ignore, just
tends to perpetuate a lot of confusion. I am responding to questions and
points in that
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 23:54:32 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
Well, I'm no authority on this since I can't code,
My point exactly.
I think your point is not valid, unless you view Linux as an operating system
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 23:54:32 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
Well, I'm no authority on this since I can't code,
My point exactly.
I think
Gentoo on a cell phone next?
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/the-ubuntu-phone-is-official-let-the-madness-begin/#ftag=RSS56d97e7
enjoy!
On Monday 24 Feb 2014 21:48:39 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
At least KDE has not hardcoded a requirement for systemd as Gnome now
has.
GNOME has no hardcoded requirement for systemd; do your homework.
I beg your pardon, I got this wrong - I extrapolated from the Gentoo state of
affairs (I
25 matches
Mail list logo
