On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 10:15:38 PM James wrote:
Hello,
Ok the latest release of livedvd is here:
https://www.gentoo.org/news/20140826-livedvd.xml
So my understanding is you can put this on a usb stick. Run
gentoo live, download packages, set flags, install packages
and save
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:35:26 +1100, wraeth wrote:
I just had a look through the man pages of emerge, portage and ebuild,
plus at the Gentoo Devmanual and couldn't find anything; however I'm
reasonably certain that in the context of an ebuild, a use flag
defined as +flag means that it is
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
Wouldn't it have been easier to use the simple configuration option to
move the button back to where you expected it? Far less effort than
switching distros.
No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
in Unity at
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:17:07 -0500, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
You can also make a multiboot USB (for most live CDs) like that, Just
use syslinux as your bootloader, to install a new live CD (in a
nutshell):
1. Create a FAT partition big enough to store the Live CD. If the CD
has a volume
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
to rearrange all the elements of Unity in such a way that
it was logical, ergonomic, saved
Hi Alec,
I've been having a really strange issue with net-print/cups-filters for
the last few weeks, wondering whether or not it's a bug or I just have
something configured wrong. Somehow ${S} is defined as:
/var/tmp/portage/net-print/cups-filters-1.0.53/work/cups-filters-3.2.10
and
On Tuesday 25 November 2014 11:45:50 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
to rearrange all the
On Friday, November 21, 2014 08:06:25 PM Peter Weilbacher wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, thegeezer wrote:
On 20/11/14 18:19, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
But I like that trackpoint
yeah at first it's odd, but then when you start getting used to
navigating without removing hands from
On 11/25/2014 04:49 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Hi Alec,
I've been having a really strange issue with net-print/cups-filters for
the last few weeks, wondering whether or not it's a bug or I just have
something configured wrong. Somehow ${S} is defined as:
You could check (before running emerge) if you see the 3.2.10 anywhere
in
your environment (set|less)... or if maybe $PV or $S is set outside
emerge somewhere.
Wow, incredible. I never thought to check my environment, but these:
MODULE_VERSION=3.2.10
On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
specify a preference.
If default doesn't mean what will happen should you not specify a
preference, then what _does_ default mean?
--
Grant Edwards
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
to
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:41:10 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
Wouldn't it have been easier to use the simple configuration option to
move the button back to where you expected it? Far less effort than
switching distros.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
It was possible, Google has hits on this dated from shortly after the
time Unity was released.
Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
here.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:13:53 +0100 Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Am 24.11.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Gevisz:
I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing
window button x to the upper-left corner of the window in Unity of
Ubuntu 12.04 while I used to look
On 11/25/2014 10:41 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
You could check (before running emerge) if you see the 3.2.10 anywhere
in
your environment (set|less)... or if maybe $PV or $S is set outside
emerge somewhere.
Wow, incredible. I never thought to check my environment, but these:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
It was possible, Google has hits on this dated from shortly after the
time Unity was released.
Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy media-libs/phonon-vlc has unmet
requirements.
- media-libs/phonon-vlc-0.7.2::gentoo USE=-debug -qt4 (-qt5)
No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
*forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
frame button and have argued that it is more ergonomic.
There was not any possibility to
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
I do recall that one way of doing it is with UbuntuTweak.
Unity-tweak-tool cant move window buttons to the right in 14.04
as of September 3, 2014:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:21:06 -0700 Maxim Wexler maxim.wex...@gmail.com wrote:
No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
*forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
frame
On 11/25/2014 01:13 PM, Joseph wrote:
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy media-libs/phonon-vlc has unmet
requirements.
-
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:13:25AM -0700, Joseph wrote
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy media-libs/phonon-vlc has unmet
requirements.
-
Am Montag 24 November 2014, 18:13:56 schrieb James:
If you want java to prosper at Gentoo, it's gonna take an inner-circle
gentoo-dev to at least cheerlead for java within gentoo, imho.
I'm not really sure what this inner-circle stuff is supposed to mean.
You need a gentoo-dev who is
On 11/25/14 14:04, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
On 11/25/2014 01:13 PM, Joseph wrote:
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy media-libs/phonon-vlc has
Am Dienstag 25 November 2014, 12:56:00 schrieb Alec Ten Harmsel:
I am just wondering, though,
why aren't all internal variables prefixed with PORTAGE_ or the like to
prevent this sort of thing?
it's not really internal, just defined in an eclass... and these are regular
environment
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:55:07 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
here.
Why not Google it yourself?
Because it is very hard to google a link if it does not exist.
On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
specify a preference.
If default doesn't mean what will happen should you not specify a
preference, then what
On 25/11/2014 19:03, Gevisz wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
Only now, I have realized that,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:56:05 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/11/2014 19:03, Gevisz wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:49:53 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:55:07 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
here.
Why not
On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler maxim.wex...@gmail.com wrote:
No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
*forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
frame button and have argued that it
On 2014-11-25, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
specify a preference.
If default doesn't mean what
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:24:34 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
Can you, please, help me? :)
I did, I told you about UbuntuTweak, but here's a link
http://bit.ly/1rpmTbK
Yes, but this simply does not work.
OK, so it doesn't work.
The point was that it could be changed. I neither remember nor
On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
The point was that it could be changed. […]
[…] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
enough to drive people away.
The point was that when you feel
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
The point was that it could be changed. […]
[…] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
enough to drive people away.
Well, if you put it like that.
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100 Emanuele Rusconi ema...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
The point was that it could be changed. […]
[…] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:56:58 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
The point was that it could be changed. […]
[…] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler maxim.wex...@gmail.com wrote:
No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
*forced*
Am 25.11.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Gevisz:
It usually took me from 10 to 20 minutes to download my daily updates
in Ubuntu. For big packages - about 40 minutes or even more.
That's the time saving aspect
lol :)
Not lol, it is like I told you. Binary distributions are a big, big
time saver
40 matches
Mail list logo
