On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pdf form that I print. Once the form is printed I put it back in the
printer tray and print information over top of it.
It worked in the past but after I print it second time (over the printed
form) the pages look as if
On 01/24/15 13:34, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Joseph [1]syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pdf form that I print. Once the form is printed I put it back in
the printer tray and print information over top of it.
It worked in the past but after I
Hi, Rich.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:58:48PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Do you regularly update the software on your embedded system?
systemd-183 hasn't
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 07:03:30 +0100, Tomas Mozes wrote:
Binary packages:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94176
In my experience, using the -k or -K option makes emerge take longer to
calculate the package list, which makes sense as it also needs to check
On Saturday 24 January 2015 16:43:41 Nils Holland wrote:
I've been using chromium successfully on my ~x86 system for quite a
long time, but starting with the last two updates that came in during
the last few days (namely, chromium-40.0.2214.85 and
chromium-40.0.2214.91), I started having
Nils Holland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted:
I've pdf form that I print. Once the form is printed I put it back in the
printer tray and print information over top of it.
It worked in the past but after I print it second time (over the printed form)
the pages look as if they came out of the washing machine. They are crumpled.
I think it
On 01/24/2015 10:29 PM, Joseph wrote:
Join in1.pdf and in2.pdf into a new PDF, out1.pdf:
That was only description of the actual command that followed ...
On 01/24/15 22:03, Thanasis wrote:
On 01/24/2015 09:47 PM, Joseph wrote:
What I'm looking for I think it is called stitching two pdf files.
Join in1.pdf and in2.pdf into a new PDF, out1.pdf:
pdftk in1.pdf in2.pdf cat output out1.pdf
https://www.pdflabs.com/docs/pdftk-cli-examples/
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Do you regularly update the software on your embedded system?
systemd-183 hasn't changed a bit since the day it was released.
systemd-183's velocity is unchanged
On 01/24/15 22:03, Thanasis wrote:
On 01/24/2015 09:47 PM, Joseph wrote:
What I'm looking for I think it is called stitching two pdf files.
Join in1.pdf and in2.pdf into a new PDF, out1.pdf:
pdftk in1.pdf in2.pdf cat output out1.pdf
https://www.pdflabs.com/docs/pdftk-cli-examples/
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:47:14 -0700, Joseph wrote:
What I'm looking for I think it is called stitching two pdf files.
app-text/pdftk
--
Neil Bothwick
I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away
pgpf9LFpXzMLL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:40:32 -0700, Joseph wrote:
pdftk 1.pdf t4-flat-02b.pdf cat output out1.pdf
did the same as pdfjoin. It generated document with two pages.
I don't want to combine them together (have two pages). I want to
stitch them, two pages into one page.
Look at the background
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted: read failure 40%
On 01/24/2015 09:47 PM, Joseph wrote:
What I'm looking for I think it is called stitching two pdf files.
Join in1.pdf and in2.pdf into a new PDF, out1.pdf:
pdftk in1.pdf in2.pdf cat output out1.pdf
https://www.pdflabs.com/docs/pdftk-cli-examples/
On 01/24/15 20:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:40:32 -0700, Joseph wrote:
pdftk 1.pdf t4-flat-02b.pdf cat output out1.pdf
did the same as pdfjoin. It generated document with two pages.
I don't want to combine them together (have two pages). I want to
stitch them, two pages
After exactly 2 years , I'm trying to update my Asus EEE netbook.
I've emerged gcc-4.8.3 ( 3 h 31 m ), portage-2.2.14 udev-216 .
However, I've lost X : trying to update gtk+ , I've run into a problem :
it requires Mesa Cairo both require libdrm-2.4.58 ,
which refuses to compile, failing with
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Am 22.01.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Tom H:
Sure. My point was that anyone can claim that systemd is (un)popular
in the embedded space.
I don't know if it is popular; in embedded systems though the last thing you
need
On 25/01/15 03:47, Joseph wrote:
On 01/24/15 13:34, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Joseph [1]syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pdf form that I print. Once the form is printed I put it back in
the printer tray and print information over top of it.
Am 24.01.2015 um 05:20 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Is there any way to make it faster or (in other words): Are there
different ways to Calculating dependencies... and have only chossen
the slowest one...?
What can I do to spped it up?
Portage is written in Python, normally running on
Am 22.01.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Tom H:
Sure. My point was that anyone can claim that systemd is (un)popular
in the embedded space.
I don't know if it is popular; in embedded systems though the last thing
you need are fast moving targets IMHO, you want to use proven, reliable
tools.
If
Hi folks,
I've been using chromium successfully on my ~x86 system for quite a
long time, but starting with the last two updates that came in during
the last few days (namely, chromium-40.0.2214.85 and
chromium-40.0.2214.91), I started having problems.
Both of these versions build just fine, but
Hi,
after submitting
cfg-update -u
I got
* invalid key... try again: bash: readkey: command not found
printed on the screen endlessly.
How can I scuccessfully use cfg-update as before?
What did I wrong?
Best regards,
Meino
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:30:52 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:45 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a way to have default config lines that emerge updates
won't touch?
I'd be interested in hearing about alternatives, but I switched
If the bottleneck is reading the information from disk you might
upgrade the SD card or use a USB drive instead, which may have better
random access performance. You could also store the portage tree on
another machine with faster storage and access it over the network. If
the bottleneck is
On Saturday 24 January 2015 06:56:16 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
I experimented with kinds of not compiling it natively like distcc,
crosscompiling and such. May be me of may be a problem with the tools/
the environment/the setup or whatever: The results were corrupted
systems every time. This
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 07:03:30 +0100, Tomas Mozes wrote:
Binary packages:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94176
In my experience, using the -k or -K option makes emerge take longer to
calculate the package list, which makes sense as it also needs to check
the availability of
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 3:34 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
after submitting
cfg-update -u
I got
* invalid key... try again: bash: readkey: command not found
printed on the screen endlessly.
How can I scuccessfully use cfg-update as before?
What did I wrong?
Update to
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
SNIP
Since this is the 2nd time for this specific drive, thoughts?
By the way, I'm doing a dd
Hello, Rich.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Am 22.01.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Tom H:
Sure. My point was that anyone can claim that systemd is (un)popular
in the embedded space.
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
