Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 03/04/2017 10:51 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" >> >> make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 >> * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): >> * emake failed >>

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" > >make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 > * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * emake failed > * >* If you need support, post the output of `emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On 5 March 2017 at 00:59, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I just can't believe it. They're issuing a general-purpose tool, to work > everywhere, and they don't test it on a representative sample of systems? It was tested, otherwise how could the conflict with kde-apps/gpgmepp

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 11:48:23 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 14:59:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> ... It's a ~arch package, so you get to be a field tester when you use > >> it > >> > >> :-) > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 03/04/2017 03:01 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" > > make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 > * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * emake failed > * [snip] I advanced a bit, now I'm getting: make: ***

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): * emake failed * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo'`, * the complete build log and the

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 09:52:38 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> [ebuild U ] app-vim/gentoo-syntax-20170225 [20160530] > >> [ebuild U ~] app-editors/gvim-8.0.0386 [8.0.0106] > > > > Because vim-8.0.0386 is stable and, presumably, the vim and gvim > > versions must match. I would suggest

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Saturday 04 March 2017 10:40:06 Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Marc Joliet > > > > Does nobody think of searching bugs.gentoo.org anymore? It was an > > oversight: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611386#c6. > > Actually, most plain users won't

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On 04/03/2017 18:30, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 14:59:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> ... It's a ~arch package, so you get to be a field tester when you use it >> :-) > > As Marc said, it isn't. But I'm incredulous that gpgme wasn't tested on a > standard KDE system. That just

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:37:13 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > > > $ eix gvim > > [I] app-editors/gvim > > Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope > > debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Marc Joliet > > Does nobody think of searching bugs.gentoo.org anymore? It was an oversight: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611386#c6. > Actually, most plain users won't remember or know that there is such a thing. Your post may

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Saturday 04 March 2017 09:52:38 Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > >> So, in my portage tree currently there is one stable gvim package with > >> version 8.0.0106 > >> and one

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > >> So, in my portage tree currently there is one stable gvim package with >> version 8.0.0106 >> and one unstable gvim package, with version 8.0.0386. >> >> Why portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 14:59:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> ... It's a ~arch package, so you get to be a field tester when you use it >> :-) > > As Marc said, it isn't. But I'm incredulous that gpgme wasn't tested on a

[gentoo-user] Re: CIFS mounts started misbehaving

On 2017-03-04, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:02:11 + schrieb "J. Roeleveld" > : > >> >> >Normally, when things are working but idle, the TCP connection to 445 >> >shows an SMB echo request/rseponse transaction once per minute. When >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 15:00:41 Marc Joliet wrote: > On Saturday 04 March 2017 10:52:57 Mick wrote: --->8 > > Apparently USE="-cxx -qt5" should allow gpgme to build. kdepimlibs goes > > away on KDE-5 and the packages affected are in flux at this point. I > > will rinse and repeat at a later

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > $ eix gvim > [I] app-editors/gvim > Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope > debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt netbeans nls perl python > racket ruby selinux session tcl PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 14:59:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > ... It's a ~arch package, so you get to be a field tester when you use it > :-) As Marc said, it isn't. But I'm incredulous that gpgme wasn't tested on a standard KDE system. That just beggars belief. -- Regards Peter

[gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

$ eix gvim [I] app-editors/gvim Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt netbeans nls perl python racket ruby selinux session tcl PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} Installed versions:

[gentoo-user] -dec-terminal- fonts

Some time back a standard part of an X install were fonts with names like: -dec-terminal-bold-r-normal--14-140-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 -dec-terminal-medium-r-normal--0-0-75-75-c-0-dec-dectech The list is about 10 lines longer. I have them on a debian install but not sure where they came from. I do

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:31:27AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/04/2017 10:18 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > > > So, that will bring in the update, just like emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm > > will. > > > > But, why isn't --deep @world doing so? Is it bug-reporting time? > > > > (There is

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On 03/04/2017 10:18 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > So, that will bring in the update, just like emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm > will. > > But, why isn't --deep @world doing so? Is it bug-reporting time? > > (There is one other slight possible anomoly I could find: > 'equery depends sys-devel/llvm'

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:55:30AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/04/2017 09:37 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > > > Michael, thanks for your response. No, I did not do a one-shot; llvm > > was brought in by way of mesa -> gallium; this is llvm's only use on > > this system as far as I

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I install slotted guile

Alen McKinnon: > On 04/03/2017 15:56, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > I need booth guile-2 (for geda) and guile-1.8 (for lilypond). ... > > So, does anyone know how to install both of them ? > You can't. At least, you can't emerge both with the current tree, you ... Thanks, bad to know, I won't

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On 03/04/2017 09:37 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > Michael, thanks for your response. No, I did not do a one-shot; llvm > was brought in by way of mesa -> gallium; this is llvm's only use on > this system as far as I know. > > Also, 'emerge -ac' shows no packages to remove. > Well, there goes

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:30:42AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/04/2017 06:38 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > Hi all - I'm running a systemd/hardened desktop with > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64". > > The result of an 'emerge -auDN --with-bdeps=y --complete-graph @world' is > > 'Nothing to

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

On 03/04/2017 06:38 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Hi all - I'm running a systemd/hardened desktop with > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64". > The result of an 'emerge -auDN --with-bdeps=y --complete-graph @world' is > 'Nothing to merge; quitting.' > > However, if I 'emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm', I get: >

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I install slotted guile

On 04/03/2017 15:56, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > I need booth guile-2 (for geda) and guile-1.8 (for lilypond). > > I can install either of the two > # emerge -aqv dev-scheme/guile:12/8 # version 1.8.8 > # emerge -aqv dev-scheme/guile:12/22 # version 2.0.14 > > but not both > > # emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 March 2017 10:52:57 Mick wrote: > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 09:45:28 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 for > > many things. I've been running happily on =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.5, but > > today > > portage

[gentoo-user] How do I install slotted guile

I need booth guile-2 (for geda) and guile-1.8 (for lilypond). I can install either of the two # emerge -aqv dev-scheme/guile:12/8 # version 1.8.8 # emerge -aqv dev-scheme/guile:12/22 # version 2.0.14 but not both # emerge -aqvuDN dev-scheme/guile:12/22 dev-scheme/guile:12/8 [ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 March 2017 14:59:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 04/03/2017 14:33, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 12:42:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 04/03/2017 11:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >>> Greetings. > >>> > >>> This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On 04/03/2017 14:33, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 12:42:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 04/03/2017 11:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> Greetings. >>> >>> This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 >>> for many things. I've been running happily on

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 12:42:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 04/03/2017 11:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 > > for many things. I've been running happily on =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.5, > > but today portage wants to

Re: [gentoo-user] gpgme update and kdepimlibs-4.14.11_pre20160211 blocker

On 04/03/2017 13:02, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 12:41:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 04/03/2017 11:50, Mick wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> This morning's attempt to update a no-multilib PC brought up this >>> conflict: >>> >>> # emerge -1aDv app-crypt/gpgme >>> >>> These are the packages

[gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

Hi all - I'm running a systemd/hardened desktop with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64". The result of an 'emerge -auDN --with-bdeps=y --complete-graph @world' is 'Nothing to merge; quitting.' However, if I 'emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm', I get: '[ebuild r U ] sys-devel/llvm-3.9.1-r1 [3.7.1-r3]' and

Re: [gentoo-user] gpgme update and kdepimlibs-4.14.11_pre20160211 blocker

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 12:41:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 04/03/2017 11:50, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This morning's attempt to update a no-multilib PC brought up this > > conflict: > > > > # emerge -1aDv app-crypt/gpgme > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > >

[gentoo-user] Re: gpgme update and kdepimlibs-4.14.11_pre20160211 blocker

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 09:50:21 Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > This morning's attempt to update a no-multilib PC brought up this conflict: > > # emerge -1aDv app-crypt/gpgme > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild U ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On Saturday 04 Mar 2017 09:45:28 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Greetings. > > This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 for > many things. I've been running happily on =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.5, but today > portage wants to upgrade to =app-crypt/gpgme-1.8.0-r2. But that

Re: [gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

On 04/03/2017 11:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Greetings. > > This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 for > many things. I've been running happily on =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.5, but today > portage wants to upgrade to =app-crypt/gpgme-1.8.0-r2. But that version > can't

Re: [gentoo-user] gpgme update and kdepimlibs-4.14.11_pre20160211 blocker

On 04/03/2017 11:50, Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > This morning's attempt to update a no-multilib PC brought up this conflict: > > # emerge -1aDv app-crypt/gpgme > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild U ]

[gentoo-user] 32 bit firefox on 64 bit system

Is it possible? Background: some time ago I converted my atom 330 system (ASUS ION) to 64 bits. RAM is about 3.3GB, but usage never approaches the limit. My problem is that firefox went snail. chromium seems OK (I can't recall whether it was faster on 32 bits, but anyway the difference is small).

[gentoo-user] gpgme update and kdepimlibs-4.14.11_pre20160211 blocker

Hi All, This morning's attempt to update a no-multilib PC brought up this conflict: # emerge -1aDv app-crypt/gpgme These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] app-crypt/gpgme-1.8.0-r2:1/11::gentoo [1.5.5:1/11::gentoo] USE="cxx%*

[gentoo-user] Gpgme oddity

Greetings. This is a KDE ~amd64 box, which still depends on kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 for many things. I've been running happily on =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.5, but today portage wants to upgrade to =app-crypt/gpgme-1.8.0-r2. But that version can't be installed while kdepimlibs:4 is still around, as I

[gentoo-user] Re: CIFS mounts started misbehaving

Am Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:02:11 + schrieb "J. Roeleveld" : > On March 4, 2017 12:41:05 AM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards > wrote: > >On 2017-03-03, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > >> On March 3, 2017 7:49:27 PM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CIFS mounts started misbehaving

On March 4, 2017 12:41:05 AM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards wrote: >On 2017-03-03, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> On March 3, 2017 7:49:27 PM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards > wrote: > >>>About a week ago, they started acting oddly. They