Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On Monday, 27 November 2017 22:14:34 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:48:11 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > These few lines save you from all the potential hassle that sharing > > > read/write access to the same files could bring. Dovecot will ensure > > > that indexes are up to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote > On 27/11/2017 21:59, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > >> mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any > >> special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you

[gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

Hi all, I need to expand two bcache fronted 4xdisk btrfs raid 10's - this requires purchasing 4 drives (and one system does not have room for two more drives) so I am trying to see if using raid 5 is an option I have been trying to find if btrfs raid 5/6 is stable enough to use but while

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:48:11 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > These few lines save you from all the potential hassle that sharing > > read/write access to the same files could bring. Dovecot will ensure > > that indexes are up to date when mail is delivered, and that alone is > > reason enough for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

On 27/11/2017 21:59, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any >> special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you no longr >> actually need maybe? > > All the later ones are ~arch ? >

[gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any > special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you no longr > actually need maybe? All the later ones are ~arch ? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and

Re: [gentoo-user] mesa build failure

On 27/11/2017 20:18, Walter Dnes wrote: > I'm running 32-bit Gentoo. mesa is the last remaining package in the > current emerge update. Just in case, I tried... > > MAKEOPTS="-j1" emerge --changed-use --deep --update @world > > That did not help. Attached are the build log and output of >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On 27.11.17 18:48, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Do you really need lmtp for that, though? As far as I remember simply > piping the messages to the /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver program, as the > deilivery mechanism, will ensure the same thing. Both Dovecot and Postfix speak LMTP, so why not use it for

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

On 11/27/2017 10:14 AM, Lex Luthor wrote: > Yeah, MS can have some pretty malicious practices. When they acquired > Skype they *removed* the E2E encryption. I am only using it for people I occasionally contact who are using it. Specifically there is a group who I am involved with is ~800 km

[solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

Thank you, On 11/27/2017 10:02 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, November 27, 2017, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku > > wrote: > >> I know, that when I was trying to figure out just "what was supported" I >> actually wasn't

[gentoo-user] mesa build failure

I'm running 32-bit Gentoo. mesa is the last remaining package in the current emerge update. Just in case, I tried... MAKEOPTS="-j1" emerge --changed-use --deep --update @world That did not help. Attached are the build log and output of emerge --info '=media-libs/mesa-17.1.8::gentoo' --

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

Yeah, MS can have some pretty malicious practices. When they acquired Skype they *removed* the E2E encryption. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:02 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > > On Monday, November 27, 2017, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku < > jigme.da...@datsemultimedia.com> wrote: > > Is

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

Hello, On Monday, November 27, 2017, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku < jigme.da...@datsemultimedia.com> wrote: > Is Skype "largely unusable" on Gentoo? It feels like about 3 days ago I > was forced to upgrade because "this version is no longer supported" and > to upgrade I had to keyword the latest

Re: [gentoo-user] python build fail; undefined reference to pthread_* and sem_*

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:56:21AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote >> >> > I can reproduce the issue by adding -fopenmp to my CFLAGS. You can >> > work around it

[gentoo-user] Re: Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On 2017-11-27 17:13, Ralph Seichter wrote: > These few lines save you from all the potential hassle that sharing > read/write access to the same files could bring. Dovecot will ensure > that indexes are up to date when mail is delivered, and that alone is > reason enough for me. Do you really

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

On 11/27/2017 11:10 AM, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku wrote: > Is Skype "largely unusable" on Gentoo? It feels like about 3 days ago I > was forced to upgrade because "this version is no longer supported" and > to upgrade I had to keyword the latest version. If this keeps > happening, to me, this is

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype

On Monday, 27 November 2017 17:10:26 GMT Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku wrote: > Is Skype "largely unusable" on Gentoo? It feels like about 3 days ago I > was forced to upgrade because "this version is no longer supported" and > to upgrade I had to keyword the latest version. If this keeps > happening,

[gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

On 2017-11-27 07:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > That came up in the OP, but the question was about doing it for > > selected ebuilds, which is exactly what this must shorter option > > does. > > You should update the wiki, your way is better. Ah, now I see why I was so confused. the

[gentoo-user] Skype

Is Skype "largely unusable" on Gentoo? It feels like about 3 days ago I was forced to upgrade because "this version is no longer supported" and to upgrade I had to keyword the latest version. If this keeps happening, to me, this is broken. And I'm not sure if the problem is that we are so far

Re: [gentoo-user] python build fail; undefined reference to pthread_* and sem_*

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:56:21AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote > > > I can reproduce the issue by adding -fopenmp to my CFLAGS. You can > > work around it by adding -fopenmp to LDFLAGS as well. > > Thanks. The following workaround

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On 27.11.17 14:44, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Do I really need to do that on this small, low-volume network? What do > I lose by letting postfix and fetchmail write files for dovecot to read? It is very easy to configure Postfix to use an LMTP socket provided by Dovecot (paths match typical

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On Friday, 24 November 2017 18:10:21 GMT Matthias Hanft wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > The ebuild installs /etc/init.d/fetchmail and /etc/conf.d/fetchmail, so > > it seems to expect me to run as a daemon. But then there's no sample > > fetchmailrc, which surprises me. > > A simple example

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

On Friday, 24 November 2017 17:52:36 GMT Ralph Seichter wrote: > As the OP is using Postfix to feed data to Dovecot, I strongly suggest > configuring Dovecot's LMTP as a mailbox transport instead of having > Postfix write directly to the file system. Do I really need to do that on this small,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

On 11/27/2017 03:35 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > That came up in the OP, but the question was about doing it for selected > ebuilds, which is exactly what this must shorter option does. > You should update the wiki, your way is better.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:57:47 +0100, David Haller wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Neil Bothwick wrote: > [..] > >% cat /etc/portage/env/media-video/vcdimager-0.7.24 > >post_src_unpack() { > >cd "${S}" > >epatch_user > >} > >