[gentoo-user] mpv: no sound anymore...?

Hi, either by one of the last updates or by me while un-pulseaudio-fy firefox (and removing pulseaudio afterwards) mpv is no longer willing to play any sound. Some informations: [I] media-video/mpv Available versions: 0.18.0-r1 0.25.0-r2 (~)0.26.0 (~)0.27.0-r1 [M](~)0.28.0 ** {+X

[gentoo-user] Re: dev-qt/qtdeclarative fails to build

On 20/01/18 00:10, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: Hey everyone, I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed: $ cat build.log --- >8 --- g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

On 01/19/2018 05:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: [snip] > > The strange part is that on the same box I created a new "user" and > Libreoffice works just fine. > But it will not work when I log in. > > I've deleted the folder setting. /home/joseph/.config/libreoffice/ > and copied the same

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-20, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2018 04:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected based >> on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real one). > > Okay > >> I get the

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19 23:58, Grant Edwards wrote: > That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected > based on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real > one). I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound > routing based on input method aren't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 05:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote: I'm trying to juggle the various pieces as I understand them to see if everything can work together. I have a fleeting thought that /might/ work. I want to write it down before I loose it. 1) Configure Sendmail's MTA to not have any listening

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 04:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected based on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real one). Okay I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound routing based on input method

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

Thelma On 01/17/2018 04:06 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice > [ebuild R ] app-office/libreoffice-5.4.2.2 USE="bluetooth branding cups > dbus gnome gtk java mysql (-coinmp) -collada -debug -eds (-firebird) -gltf > -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk3

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2018 04:04 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> One of the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install >> any of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for >> sending normal e-mail. > > I would

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-qt/qtdeclarative fails to build

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28:49AM +0100, David Haller wrote: > revdep-rebuild -vp --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude gcc Oof, I just ran this anyways and a lot of packages popped up. Guess I'll rebuild some stuff over the night and see if that fixes it :) Thanks for your help so far!

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-qt/qtdeclarative fails to build

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28:49AM +0100, David Haller wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > >I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed: > > > >$ cat build.log > >g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o >

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-qt/qtdeclarative fails to build

Hello, On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: >I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed: > >$ cat build.log >g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o >libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 04:04 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: One of the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install any of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for sending normal e-mail. I would expect that you can use any of those in place of msmtp to send email too.

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an >> SMTP server? >> >>> >> >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP. >> >>> >> >>> If the above is what you need, any

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 03:24 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: But if I understand the problem now (a well sized if, LOL) that doesn't by itself help you because the existing script is broken; replacing the script is the main part of the problem. Right? Grant E.'s existing script purportedly functions just

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote: > Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an > SMTP server? > >>> > >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP. > >>> > >>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need > >>> to hand the mail over to something

[gentoo-user] dev-qt/qtdeclarative fails to build

Hey everyone, I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed: $ cat build.log --- >8 --- g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: Aargh. smtpd. Typos like that certinaly don't help the confusion. *chuckle* - Mistakes happen. - Context answered the question more than 90%. I'm going to try stunnel in front of the existing solution first. If that doesn't work, I'll try

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport. >> Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier. > > *nod* > > I figured that you would be

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I'm also wondering why you need 2 bits. Earlier in the thread you >> mentioned that you send perhaps a few messages a week and never more >> than one connection at a time. > > Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport. Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier. *nod* I figured that you would be able to find something. Hence why I mentioned the terms. ;-) I could live

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Just like the others

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 19/01/2018 22:01, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you > need 2 pieces

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: I'm also wondering why you need 2 bits. Earlier in the thread you mentioned that you send perhaps a few messages a week and never more than one connection at a time. Grant E. has indicated elsewhere in the thread that his /usr/bin/sendmail script

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you >> > need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for >> > you? It certainly has all the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you >>> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for >>> you? It certainly has all the functionality. >> >> I don't

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2018 11:38 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> I have a /usr/bin/sendmail emulator that transfers mail to an MTA >> that will then worry about delivery. I need an SMTP server that >> will relay incoming mail by using that

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote: > > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you > > need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for > > you? It certainly has all the functionality. > > I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 11:59 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: I meant the sematics and sytax of the command line options and the data accepted on stdin and produced on stdout. I probably should have said "usage" rather than API. Since I always use that utility from a Python or Bash program, in my head that's

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > So you don't need to accept mail via /usr/sbin/sendmail (et al). Correct. > Or rather, that's what you want email to leave the relay through. Correct. >> I want to relay each of those messages by invoking a command-line >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 11:38 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: I have a /usr/bin/sendmail emulator that transfers mail to an MTA that will then worry about delivery. I need an SMTP server that will relay incoming mail by using that existing command-line utility. … I need something that accepts mail via SMTP

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-19 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a >> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay >> them by passing them to a command-line

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 11:31 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: I want to accept incoming email via SMTP (my computer is an SMTP server). Okay. So you don't need to accept mail via /usr/sbin/sendmail (et al). Or rather, that's what you want email to leave the relay through. I want to relay each of those

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a > non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay > them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail > replacement provided by msmtp). Just

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote: > I haven't done enough with the above (alternate) MTAs to be able to > speak to them. But my understanding is that they come with a > /path/to/sendmail wrapper script (or binary) that emulates part of > what the sendmail binary

[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 2018-01-19, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 19.01.18 19:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> I need to setup an SMTP relay server. >> >> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a >> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then

Re: [gentoo-user] Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 01/19/2018 11:03 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: I need to setup an SMTP relay server. Okay. It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g.

Re: [gentoo-user] Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

On 19.01.18 19:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > I need to setup an SMTP relay server. > > It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a > non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay > them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail

[gentoo-user] Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

I need to setup an SMTP relay server. It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail replacement provided by msmtp). It only needs to

Re: [gentoo-user] www-client/chromium-63.0.3239.132

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Mick wrote: > > On my old i7 laptop it eats up all 4G of RAM and 4G of swap before it conks > out. So, I dropped the jobs to 3 and --load-average to 2, added a swapfile to > increase disk space and it now builds in around 13 hours. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] www-client/chromium-63.0.3239.132

On Friday, 19 January 2018 13:29:51 GMT Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:26 AM, victor romanchuk wrote: > > local:jumbo-build:www-client/chromium: Combine source files to speed up > > build process.> > > setting that significantly speeds up emerge time

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB3 external storage HD's

On 18/01/18 21:22, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > if you're going with external drives use laptop drives, or build a JBOD > with good cooling. in any case, monitor drive temperatures, in my > experiance anything above 100F is asking for a short life, bellow or at > 100F drives new

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB3 external storage HD's

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:49 AM, wrote: > On 01/19/2018 02:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB3 external storage HD's

On 01/19/2018 02:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)? >>> I don't want to install any ventor-software, I just want one that plugs

Re: [gentoo-user] www-client/chromium-63.0.3239.132

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:26 AM, victor romanchuk wrote: > local:jumbo-build:www-client/chromium: Combine source files to speed up > build process. > > setting that significantly speeds up emerge time (tried it twice; the second > attempt had the flag set) > > $ qlop -gHv

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB3 external storage HD's

On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)? > > I don't want to install any ventor-software, I just want one that plugs > > and play. > > > > Any recommendations? > >