On 2018-06-12 08:23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Looks like I'd have to build kernel 4.9.107 in an environment
> resembling yours to try and reproduce the behavior in question.
> What is the version of kmods you have installed on your system?
> What's the output of 'emerge --info'?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> On 2018-06-09 18:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> > readelf -h /path/to/module.ko
>
> ELF Header:
> Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> Class: ELF64
> Data:
On 06/11/2018 06:50 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
The “dev” syntax is correct. As tun0 is a L3 tunnel, you don’t
have to bother about ARP next-hop resolution.
Thank you for the confirmation Alarig.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
So, from what I’m reading in the thread you need three things:
1. Look at what are the internal ranges used at work
2. Disable the default route to the VPN
3. For each range, add a route like 'ip route add $range dev
tun0'
For the last part, it should be a good
Hi,
On ven. 8 juin 18:34:14 2018, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I'd then reconfigure the VPN with "Use only for resources on this
> connection." and then do something like this:
>
> I'm not completely sure about the "dev" syntax as it's been a while since
> I've done routes via devices. Check IP's man
On 06/11/2018 02:51 PM, Mick wrote:
As I understand it, the CGN router will rewrite the IP headers and ports from/
to the SOHO router using PCP. This is not a TCP-over-TCP tunnel.
The VPN could be TCP based and it could be sending TCP through it. Yes,
the potential pitfalls of TCP-in-TCP
On Monday, 11 June 2018 17:47:16 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 04:55 AM, Mick wrote:
> > You'll need a trusted gateway to do the unwrapping and then forwarding
> > to the next hop (SSH forwarding). If you attempt TCP-tunneling
> > (TCP-over-TCP) you'll soon experience 'TCP meltdown'
On 11/06/18 20:11, R0b0t1 wrote:
> AMD is an American company based out of California. However rereading
> the post I notice he is using Euros, in which case there are likely
> even stronger guarantees of fitness for a particular purpose. I
> suppose it doesn't help that the seller seems to have
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Wol's lists wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/18 16:30, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> Federal law implies a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose*
>> from the seller, not the manufacturer. You can take it up with them.
>> The statute of limitations is 4 years. Make them deal
On 11/06/18 16:30, R0b0t1 wrote:
Federal law implies a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose*
from the seller, not the manufacturer. You can take it up with them.
The statute of limitations is 4 years. Make them deal with AMD.
Please read the parent post !!!
The seller no longer
>
>> You shouldn't have any of these packages installed now, they should have
>> been depcleaned after xorg-proto was installed. If depclean doesn't
>> remove them, they still be required by a package in an overlay, that
>> happened to me.
>>
>> emerge -cpv packagename
>>
>> should tell you why
On 11/06/18 09:54, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Wol's lists wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/18 18:09, Rich Freeman wrote:
> ...
>>> downsides as well, in particular it is certainly more complex and at
>>> work we practically forbid any kind of windows ACLs at anything other
>>> than the top mount level because
On 06/11/2018 04:55 AM, Mick wrote:
You'll need a trusted gateway to do the unwrapping and then forwarding
to the next hop (SSH forwarding). If you attempt TCP-tunneling
(TCP-over-TCP) you'll soon experience 'TCP meltdown' with upper and
lower TCP layers' retransmission timeouts.
I
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 June 2018 14:06:22 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> The shop I bouught everything from seems to have gone out of business,
>> with both its telephone number and its website having been down for a
>> sustained period. So I'm unlikely to
On 2018-06-09 18:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> readelf -h /path/to/module.ko
ELF Header:
Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Class: ELF64
Data: 2's complement, little endian
Version:
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 23:51:42 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/10/2018 12:30 PM, Mick wrote:
> > If NAT'ed between guest and host and then NAT'ed again at the home
> > router, you are double NAT'ed.
>
> Or possibly triple NATed if your ISP is using Carrier Grade NAT.
>
> At least that's one
Thank you for the advice, you've both been very helpful! I'll take a look
at it this evening.
James
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 10:37 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:06:36 +0100, James Stevenson wrote:
>
> > I received a notification that one of my packages had been masked by my
> >
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:06:36 +0100, James Stevenson wrote:
> I received a notification that one of my packages had been masked by my
> profile. Am I correct in thinking that this issue will resolve itself in
> 30 days?
>
> !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> -
James Stevenson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was running `emerge --update --newuse --deep @world` this morning and
> I received a notification that one of my packages had been masked by my
> profile. Am I correct in thinking that this issue will resolve itself in
> 30 days?
>
> !!! The following
Hi all,
I was running `emerge --update --newuse --deep @world` this morning and
I received a notification that one of my packages had been masked by my
profile. Am I correct in thinking that this issue will resolve itself in
30 days?
!!! The following installed packages are masked:
-
Wol's lists wrote:
> On 09/06/18 18:09, Rich Freeman wrote:
...
> > downsides as well, in particular it is certainly more complex and at
> > work we practically forbid any kind of windows ACLs at anything other
> > than the top mount level because it is so hard to control.
>
> Windows is better
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 17:58:35 BST Grant Taylor wrote:
--->8 much detail that makes me feel a bit faint...
> IMHO the biggest issue is that you have to understand what you want to do
> and then translate it to the proper ip commands to do it. You need that
> high level blueprint (if you
22 matches
Mail list logo
