On 2/5/19 10:55 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Yeah, I think you're over-reading into my posts. I'm mostly reacting
to your ideas and not trying to be prescriptive.
So we have a feedback loop. I'm trying to understand why you're saying
what you're saying.
I'm still looking for possibilities and
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:18 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 04:28:49 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
> > My own solution is actually very simple. I have a "secret algorithm"
> > that incorporates several secrets with a predictable way to generate a
> > site-specific secret. The
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/4/2019, 8:10:57 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> I've been using a little Firefox Addon called Passwordmaker for many,
>>> many years, and despite all of its warts, I've been loathe to give it
>>> up, even though it will never be upgraded to work as a WebExtension.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 04:28:49 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> My own solution is actually very simple. I have a "secret algorithm"
> that incorporates several secrets with a predictable way to generate a
> site-specific secret. The end result is a 100% predictable way to
> generate unique
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:39 AM Jack wrote:
> The problem I have with many of these suggestions is that I have
> multiple devices (two desktops, two laptops, tablet, android phone) I
> use sufficiently often that I either need to be able to remember the
> passwords or have some way of easily
On 2/4/2019, 8:10:57 PM, Dale wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>> I've been using a little Firefox Addon called Passwordmaker for many,
>> many years, and despite all of its warts, I've been loathe to give it
>> up, even though it will never be upgraded to work as a WebExtension.
>>
>> 2 things I loved
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:10 PM Grant Taylor
wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2019 02:58 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > So, I think we're miscommunicating a bit here...
>
> It happens.
>
Yeah, I think you're over-reading into my posts. I'm mostly reacting
to your ideas and not trying to be prescriptive.
For
On 2/4/19 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 02/03/2019 11:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> Ultimately netifrc is just a shell script that parses another shell
>> script to construct a third shell script. I don't think doing it with
>> only two shell scripts is that much less elegant =)
>
> The
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:34 AM Dale wrote:
>> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:12 PM Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:59:02 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> One reason I use LastPass, it is mobile. I can go to
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:34 AM Dale wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:12 PM Dale wrote:
> >> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:59:02 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>>
> > One reason I use LastPass, it is mobile. I can go to someone else's
> >
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 07:55:41 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Mick wrote:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LastPass#Security_issues
>>>
>> From what I read, no users had their passwords compromised in those.
> I read it differently. LastPass didn't know if any passwds were compromised
>
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 10:13:44 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> After seeing your reply, I realize I just type the command and it
>> prompts me for a password. I ctrl c to exit. Well, ain't that
>> something? You can stop laughing now. ;-)
>>
>> It seems to think helloworld and
On 04/02/2019 22:49, Dale wrote:
Also, if my computer were to
die a sudden death, power supply goes bonkers and burns everything in it
up including hard drives, my passwords are still safe but available.
Firefox stores my login passwords encrypted on a server provided by
Mozilla. It syncs
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 07:55:41 GMT Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LastPass#Security_issues
> >
> From what I read, no users had their passwords compromised in those.
I read it differently. LastPass didn't know if any passwds were compromised
(or wouldn't
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 10:13:44 GMT Dale wrote:
> After seeing your reply, I realize I just type the command and it
> prompts me for a password. I ctrl c to exit. Well, ain't that
> something? You can stop laughing now. ;-)
>
> It seems to think helloworld and reallysecurepassword is
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am 05.02.19 um 10:55 schrieb Mick:
>> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>>> They also mentioned
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which I can get since
>> they
Am 05.02.19 um 10:55 schrieb Mick:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which I can get since
> they pass some obvious
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 08:41:28 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:26:52 +, Mick wrote:
> > You could use gpg/openssl to encrypt a number of files, which would
> > contain your different website/application passwds.
>
> pass does exactly that
>
> * app-admin/pass
>
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:26:52 +, Mick wrote:
> You could use gpg/openssl to encrypt a number of files, which would
> contain your different website/application passwds.
pass does exactly that
* app-admin/pass
Available versions: 1.7.3 ** {X dmenu emacs fish-completion +git
21 matches
Mail list logo
