Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:34 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
# ldd e2fsck/e2fsck
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb8033000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7edb000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb8034000)
Ehm, exactly. So yes, it uses less libraries than
, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Thanks in advance for any insights...
Maarten
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:39 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Hi List,
[...]
# Grep works fine...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd /bin/grep
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e42000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f96000)
thoughtpad
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Maarten schrieb am 24.09.2008 21:39:
Can anyone help with this ? Does this package not support building
static ? The USE flag is there for a reason, no? Did I take the wrong
approach here ? What is up with this [damn] package ?!?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
now?
TIA
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Maarten wrote:
Or else, if /usr can be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Can we get that in writing, with a signature, creative use of {sym,hard}
links and nested mounts notwithstanding? ;)
Certainly ;-)
Oh well, it only
Uwe Thiem wrote:
On 18 February 2006 15:05, Maarten wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Maarten wrote:
Oh well, it only amounts to 23 days of my Athlons' undivided attention.
I'll live. ;-)
23 days conpressed into one second. That will be the hard part. ;-)
Well, maybe. Depending on your
is
mounted RO ?
snipped the rest of the ''argument''...
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Maarten
P.S.:
The thread this derived from has to be the most lame discussion I have
witnessed in ages, and I've seen a few. First and foremost because
neither of you took the simple effort to run two trivial 'find
...
Good luck,
Maarten
Well the first thing you need to do, is run a 'df' and see which
partitions are full. Then used these tools to find files by size and
date. Let's assume we're talking about /usr/portage/distfiles
for example:
REMOVING LARGE FILES IN /usr/portage/distfiles
find
Gilberto Martins wrote:
What is OP ?
_O_riginal _P_oster, I believe.
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
hear.
Maarten
Cheers,
Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
; it's /boot. So point it to the hdb[2|3|4|...] which is
your main / partition, and all will be well.
Maarten
label = Gentoo
read-only # read-only for checking
I adapted it from sample file. I can see that :
1) there was something missin in grub conf file;
2) I need
'init' there.
From that, one can deduce the OP probably pointed the kernel to the
wrong root partition (ie. /boot, or /usr, etc.)
Maarten
Boot from the live CD, mount your root, and do:
cp -a /dev/console /dev/null /dev/zero /mnt/gentoo/dev/
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
painful process ?
What, if any, would be possible pitfalls using this approach ?
Thank you for your time reading this,
Maarten v d Berg
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:41 +0100, Maarten wrote:
What tickles me the most about the current process is that one sometimes
gets huge lists of updated files by updating a single package. A package
which may have never been used, or at least configured, by the user
Rumen Yotov wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:37 +0100, Maarten wrote:
Hi,
Check cfg-update it's in portage, and i think it the better.
i'm using it together with dispatch-conf but think if switching
completely to 'cfg-update' (or mostly at least).
Check the forums for additional info
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 12 February 2006 07:37, Maarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
'[gentoo-user] Handling of config updates, RFC':
What tickles me the most about the current process is that one sometimes
gets huge lists of updated files by updating a single package
the cabling so that linux is on the /dev/hda device. Altough it is
possible to boot from the slave drive, but it is more straightforward to
boot from the master, and you may save yourself some headaches.
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
symlink from ln - busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
Maarten
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
.
And this is not just that special USB device. I tried connecting mice,
memory sticks, cardreaders, network interfaces, even hubs... nothing.
Can someone please help me ? I've been wrestling with this issue for
weeks now... :-(
Thanks in advance,
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:45:51 +0100, Maarten wrote:
I need to distinguish several, mostly identical, USB devices from each
other by assigning them unique static names. I know there are primers(*)
that describe the process, and I try to follow them, but either the
gentoo
Michael Mauch wrote:
Maarten wrote:
All is cleared up now. Sorry for bothering you.
FWIW, you could also run udevinfo -d to see all your devices, and use
the left side of its output for udevinfo -a -p.
Wow, yes, that is a useful tip! Thanks!
I wonder why the -d switch
23 matches
Mail list logo
