On 08/20/2009 05:23 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
I used to specify this:
softlevel=boot
in the Grub screen to boot to single user. However, this doesn't work
anymore; it boots right into the default runlevel. I think
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:47:15 -0400
schrieb ABCD en.a...@gmail.com:
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
Is this documented somewhere? I'm asking because I have no problem with
booting into
On 08/19/2009 12:55 PM, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:47:15 -0400
schrieb ABCDen.a...@gmail.com:
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
Is this documented somewhere? I'm asking
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
On 08/19/2009 12:55 PM, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:47:15 -0400
schrieb ABCDen.a...@gmail.com:
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
Is this
On 08/20/2009 01:43 AM, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
On 08/19/2009 12:55 PM, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:47:15 -0400
schrieb ABCDen.a...@gmail.com:
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:27:57 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option.
I filed a bug for it:
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 01:11:50 Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:27:57 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option.
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
In a pinch, you can also use the argument init=/bin/bash to get a
bash shell up without using init. It's saved me a CD or a heap of
trouble a few times.
Wait until some bastard runs
mv /bin/bash /bin/bash.gotcha
then you try
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 09:17:30 Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
In a pinch, you can also use the argument init=/bin/bash to get a
bash shell up without using init. It's saved me a CD or a heap of
trouble a few times.
Wait until some
On 08/19/2009 02:11 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:27:57 +0300
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option.
I filed a bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/19/2009 02:11 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:27:57 +0300
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I used to specify this:
softlevel=boot
in the Grub screen to boot to single user. However, this doesn't work
anymore; it boots right into the default runlevel. I think this
happened after I upgraded to
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
Instead, pass S to skip just about everything, and start a root shell
(via sulogin), or 1 to do the equivalent of /sbin/rc single (that
is, drop the
Albert Hopkins wrote:
Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
Instead, pass S to skip just about everything, and start a root shell
(via sulogin), or 1 to do the equivalent of /sbin/rc single
On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option.
I filed a bug for it: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281850
15 matches
Mail list logo