On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:29 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempted to
start cross-compiling.
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempted to
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
Wanna guess why?
well, this is Gentoo, so compile X where X=any damn large enough
package probably still fits :) Openoffice for
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
Wanna guess why?
well, this is Gentoo, so compile X where X=any damn large
sorry to hijack the thread even further...
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 23:04 +, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, James wrote:
James R. Campbell jamesc at reliant-data.com writes:
What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
He probably meant 'ps axu'
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, James wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never
drops below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands
out. I did notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when
the
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
tigah_- yes
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
tigah_- yes
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G
Any ideas?
No.But do you also see this without X running, without most daemons running,
in single user mode...?
James R. Campbell jamesc at reliant-data.com writes:
What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
# ps ax
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [3]
2 ?S 0:00
Henry Gebhardt hsggebhardt at googlemail.com writes:
Any ideas?
No.But do you also see this without X running,
Yep, same load with X killed off
without most daemons running,
Yep
in single user mode...?
I did not try this. what's the option to boot into single user mode?
What
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never drops
below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands out. I did
notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when the machine is
quiescent (nobody doing
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
443-653-1569 wrote:
On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
atop 3
filter by p
WOW!!, this atop program is great, one of the best diagnostic tools I've
seen. Why haven't I heard more about it?
Bill Roberts
What package provides
Miguel Peña Gomez mpena at linuxhelp.cl writes:
atop 3
filter by p
ATOP - galiot 2008/02/12 14:49:183 seconds elapsed
PRC | sys 0.01s | user 0.09s | #proc130 | #zombie0 | #exit ? |
CPU | sys 1% | user 3% | irq 0% | idle197% |
17 matches
Mail list logo