[gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner?

2009-08-25 Thread Grant Edwards
Last week on all my systems emerge upgraded firefox (3.5.2-r1) and xul-runner (1.9.1.2-r2). Now it's decided it wants to downgrade all of them to 3.0.13 and 1.9.0.13. Looking at the package database page, I see that firefox 3.5.2-r1 is marked as unstable (~x86). Same for xulrunner 1.3.1.2-r1.

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner?

2009-08-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 23:04:12 Grant Edwards wrote: Last week on all my systems emerge upgraded firefox (3.5.2-r1) and xul-runner (1.9.1.2-r2). Now it's decided it wants to downgrade all of them to 3.0.13 and 1.9.0.13. Looking at the package database page, I see that firefox 3.5.2-r1

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner?

2009-08-25 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last week and then changed back to unstable this week? I think so, yes. If you read the Changelog file, it shows this: 21 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer