Hi folks,
from an typical SME view (mostly workstation and fileservers)
I don't really see an performance difference worth thinking of
(as already stated, there're lot's of other bottlenecks, like
storage IO).
AMD tends to win this battle by price, but Intel tends to be a
bit more rubust: I'm
On Sonntag, 23. März 2008, Neil Walker wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
price/performance still favours AMD.
How on earth do you justify that statement?
AMD Athlon64 X2 EE 6000+ 129€ (boxed)
Intel® Core 2 Duo E6850 234€
Intel® Core 2 Duo E4700 134€ (not boxed).
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Grant wrote:
| I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
| AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
| faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
| think?
|
| - Grant
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
How on earth do you justify that statement?
AMD Athlon64 X2 EE 6000+ 129€ (boxed)
Intel® Core 2 Duo E6850 234€
Intel® Core 2 Duo E4700 134€ (not boxed).
There is no equivalence there in terms of actual processing power. The
best buy on the market for
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sonntag, 23. März 2008, Neil Walker wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
price/performance still favours AMD.
How on earth do you justify that statement?
AMD Athlon64 X2 EE 6000+ 129€ (boxed)
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 10:07 -0700, Grant wrote:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
- Grant
I work at the
Grant schrieb:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
- Grant
Well the experience of a desktop or an application
Florian Philipp schrieb:
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 10:07 -0700, Grant wrote:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
-
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 18:44 +0100, Norman Rieß wrote:
Grant schrieb:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
On Samstag, 22. März 2008, Grant wrote:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
price/performance still favours AMD.
Grant schrieb:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
- Grant
Well the experience of a desktop or
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
think?
- Grant
Well the experience of a desktop or an
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
AMD has had better engineers than Intel all the time. Intel just had the money.
A few years ago the CIO from Intel advised engineers to be more creative. So AMD
will stay ahead of the pack and if they find the right way (actually they're
going
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
price/performance still favours AMD.
How on earth do you justify that statement? I am an AMD fan and have
been since the 486/133 (was a Cyrix fan before then) but I can certainly
tell you that the performance of the Intel Q6600 makes the AMD Phenom
7600 look
16 matches
Mail list logo
