On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.ukwrote:
On 25 Sep 2010, at 03:17, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
...
I've heard good things about it, but I'm under the impression it is
not free (as in beer). Is that true?
I don't know but I can emerge -q icc
There is
On 25 Sep 2010, at 03:17, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
...
I've heard good things about it, but I'm under the impression it is not
free (as in beer). Is that true?
I don't know but I can emerge -q icc
There is other non-Free software you can install with Portage.
Just yesterday I was
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.comwrote:
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me.
On 09/24/10 09:48, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.com
mailto:b...@thehenderson.com wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Bill Longman bill.long...@gmail.comwrote:
On 09/24/10 09:48, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.comwrote:
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman
On Friday 24 September 2010 10:26:54 pm Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Ahh.. I've heard good things about it, but I'm under the impression it is
not free (as in beer). Is that true?
true.
--
- Yohan Pereira.
On 09/24/10 09:56, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Bill Longman bill.long...@gmail.com
mailto:bill.long...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/24/10 09:48, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson
b...@thehenderson.com
On 09/24/10 08:11, a...@sourcegarden.de wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:23 AM, Beau Henderson wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad
On 24 Sep 2010, at 20:15, Bill Longman wrote:
...
Uh, what are PGO and ICC??
I also must add that I get decent performance from the fox on
Ubuntu let alone Vista, which makes me take your suggestion about
build parameters seriously.
ICC is the Intel C compiler.
Ahh..
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 24 Sep 2010, at 20:15, Bill Longman wrote:
...
Uh, what are PGO and ICC??
I also must add that I get decent performance from the fox on
Ubuntu let alone Vista, which makes me take your suggestion
On 09/24/2010 06:16 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 24 Sep 2010, at 20:15, Bill Longman wrote:
...
Uh, what are PGO and ICC??
I also must add that I get decent performance from the fox on
Ubuntu let alone
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.ukwrote:
On 24 Sep 2010, at 20:15, Bill Longman wrote:
...
Uh, what are PGO and ICC??
I also must add that I get decent performance from the fox on
Ubuntu let alone Vista, which makes me take your
On 09/22/2010 12:23 AM, Beau Henderson wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me. Slow UI, unusable in NX
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me. Slow UI, unusable in NX
(constant screen redraws; Thunderbird does the same thing), network
stalling for MINUTES at a
On 09/22/10 07:31, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 16:38:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me. Slow UI, unusable in NX
(constant screen redraws; Thunderbird does the same
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me. Slow UI, unusable in NX
On 09/19/10 20:02, András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.comwrote:
I had this same problem and decided I had bad RAM. Before I could order
any, I rebuild my system and it happens that I did so with an image that had
GCC 4.3* rather than 4.4. Funny enough, firefox worked just fine. I
On 09/21/10 12:41, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.com
mailto:b...@thehenderson.com wrote:
I had this same problem and decided I had bad RAM. Before I could order
any, I rebuild my system
and it happens that I did so with an image
On 21 September 2010 00:23, Beau Henderson b...@thehenderson.com wrote:
On 09/19/10 20:02, András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:02 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:32 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin
O'Gorman did opine thusly:
Yeah, me too. I teach at a university and classes start tomorrow. I've had
the fox not starting as someone else did, then on upgrade it was sort of
working, then not. The last bug I submitted
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons (xmarks,
AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. Seg fault
sometimes. I've got ECC memory, and no reported problems, and it does not
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons (xmarks,
AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. Seg fault
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.
Indeed. But FF4 is *much* faster. And much more stable. At least, that
was my experience when I tried it out. I had to go back to 3.6 because
some of
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. But FF4 is *much* faster. And much more stable. At least, that
was my experience when I tried it out. I had to go back to 3.6 because
some of the plugins that I need were not yet supported for FF4. At
least
2010/9/19 Thomas Yao t.yao...@gmail.com
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. But FF4 is *much* faster. And much more stable. At least, that
was my experience when I tried it out. I had to go back to 3.6 because
some of the plugins that I
29 matches
Mail list logo
