On Thursday 26 May 2016 09:10:12 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> You'll spend a while getting used to git, there's no way around it. You
> just have to pick a project and force yourself to use git all day. All
> of the commands have the wrong names:
>
> * Want to check out a repository? There's `git
On 05/26/2016 04:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Aye, there's the rub. Git is a closed book to me at the moment. Having to
> learn how to use it would at least triple my time to get up to speed. Time,
> I have plenty of (DV, as they say in religious circles), but my brain
> doesn't go nearly
On 05/26/2016 05:03 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 26 May 2016 09:32:26 I wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the encouragement. I'll muse awhile.
>
> Already I have an elementary question: what editors are recommended for this
> kind of work? Other than vim and emacs, that is, either of which
On Thu, 26 May 2016 09:32:26 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > These days it's a lot easier to get practice because you don't have to
> > deal with CVS. If you clone our git repo as your $PORTDIR, then you
> > can make your changes and `repoman commit` just like the rest of us.
> > If you're okay
On Thursday 26 May 2016 09:32:26 I wrote:
> Thanks for the encouragement. I'll muse awhile.
Already I have an elementary question: what editors are recommended for this
kind of work? Other than vim and emacs, that is, either of which would
involve yet another acute learning process.
--
Rgds
On Wednesday 25 May 2016 18:19:38 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
> > willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package
> > maintenance. As I've said many times in
On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:48:48 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
> I'll also mention the Proxy Maintainers project[0] here. Yes this is
> intended to facilitate people taking maintainership of a package, but my
> point is that there is a project dedicated to facilitating contributors
> without push access
On 26/05/16 08:19, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
>> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
>> As I've said many times in recent years, my
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
>> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
>> As I've said many times in recent years, my days of coding expired
On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
> As I've said many times in recent years, my days of coding expired about 25
> years ago,
On Sunday 22 May 2016 23:39:08 Dale wrote:
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/gummiboot
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:45:55 +0200
> From: Michał Górny
> Reply-To: gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
>
Forwarded Message
Subject:[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/gummiboot
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:45:55 +0200
From: Michał Górny
Reply-To: gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
Organization: Gentoo
To: gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo