[gentoo-user] Is binary emerge equivalent to source emerge?

2005-09-07 Thread Ian Clowes
Hi I've been building a box for a specific purpose by emerge-ing and playing with various packages until I ended up with something that matched what I wanted. I'd now like to rebuild the box including just the packages that turned out to be relevant. Rather than do source installs again I

Re: [gentoo-user] Is binary emerge equivalent to source emerge?

2005-09-07 Thread Sascha Lucas
Hi Ian, 1) Does this seem like a sensible idea? Will it generally work? 2) Will --usepkg --getbinpkg use binary packages for dependencies? 3) Is the resultant Portage database equivalent to source emerges, especially in respect of future --updates, --newuse, etc? 4) Am I right to use a

Re: [gentoo-user] Is binary emerge equivalent to source emerge?

2005-09-07 Thread Zac Medico
Sascha Lucas wrote: - -uD --newuse --usepkg world (binary if possible, else ebuild) does not work very well I've also had problems with --usepkg. When it gives me problems, as a workaround, I force emerge to do what I want with emerge --usepkgonly --nodeps --oneshot for each and every

Re: [gentoo-user] Is binary emerge equivalent to source emerge?

2005-09-07 Thread Sascha Lucas
I've also had problems with --usepkg. When it gives me problems, as a workaround, I force emerge to do what I want with emerge --usepkgonly --nodeps --oneshot for each and every binpkg that I want merged. If I think that this may have broken something then afterwards I use revdep-rebuild -p

Re: [gentoo-user] Is binary emerge equivalent to source emerge?

2005-09-07 Thread Zac Medico
Sascha Lucas wrote: I've also had problems with --usepkg. When it gives me problems, as a workaround, I force emerge to do what I want with emerge --usepkgonly --nodeps --oneshot for each and every binpkg that I want merged. If I think that this may have broken something then afterwards I