Am 19.12.2011 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 19.12.2011 12:01, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Built my kernel for a start, runs fine.
Considering to emerge world after a nice backup ;-)
correction: emerge system for a start ... sure ...
update:
running my ~amd64 system without
Am 18.11.2011 01:04, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
If you're feeling adventurous, GCC 4.6, currently masked for
testing, has specific -march options for the i7 and Sandybridge i7,
according to the Gentoo Wiki CFLAGS page.
Being adventurous now.
compiled sys-devel/gcc-4.6.2, and set
CFLAGS=-O2
Am 19.12.2011 12:01, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Built my kernel for a start, runs fine.
Considering to emerge world after a nice backup ;-)
correction: emerge system for a start ... sure ...
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:22:45 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
connector at the computer contains both analog and digital
signaling.
If there is only one ... this results in one VGA-output only as well ...
and I need 2.
Am 24.11.2011 10:53, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
Is there no on-board video?
Yes, there is.
yesterday: Enabled it, removed the PCIe-card, removed the Do not
remove-covers from the onboard-DVI-connectors
Unfortunately only one of these brings analog signal, the other one is
DVI-D so it
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 24.11.2011 10:53, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
Is there no on-board video?
Yes, there is.
yesterday: Enabled it, removed the PCIe-card, removed the Do not
remove-covers from the onboard-DVI-connectors
Am 24.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Michael Mol:
Is the onboard video of the same chipset as your video card? If so,
you should be able to run them just fine at the same time. I once had
an onboard ATI chipset (HD3200) working together with a Radeon 5770 to
push five displays--two VGA, two DVI and
On Nov 24, 2011 11:33 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 24.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Michael Mol:
Is the onboard video of the same chipset as your video card? If so,
you should be able to run them just fine at the same time. I once had
an onboard ATI chipset (HD3200) working
Am 24.11.2011 18:20, schrieb Michael Mol:
Never tried mix match with Intel. I'd say it's worth a try, as long as
you can stay away from the proprietary drivers. Sounds likely you'll be
hunting for a new card, though.
planning to get into my car after my first coffee ...
thx, greets, Stefan
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
-mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx --param l1-cache-size=32 --param
l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=8192
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
-mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx
Am 23.11.2011 18:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within the
last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and mtune=core2.
I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I
am more constrained by the fact
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connector
at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
ZZ
On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone
Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
If there is only one ... this results in one VGA-output only as well ...
and I need 2.
Fair enough. :)
ZZ
On Nov 24, 2011 12:25 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
If there is only one ...
Am 18.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
hardware order planned for next week maybe.
Right now I consider simply skipping the K-CPU and get some pre-built
system w/ full guarantee and stuff (even the K-CPU is outdated soon, and
the normal i7-2600 is also much faster than my C2D-E6600).
Am 2011-11-21 09:45, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 18.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
hardware order planned for next week maybe.
Right now I consider simply skipping the K-CPU and get some pre-built
system w/ full guarantee and stuff (even the K-CPU is outdated soon, and
Am 2011-11-18 01:04, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Right now I have everything built with rather CPU-specific
CFLAGS.
Specific L1/L2-cache-sizes and stuff, set after doing something
like gcc -Q --help=target -march=native
Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
compile times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
Wow, sounds
Am 2011-11-17 11:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
compile times, it's
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Right now I have everything built with rather CPU-specific CFLAGS.
Specific L1/L2-cache-sizes and stuff, set after doing something like
gcc -Q --help=target -march=native (gentoo wiki).
I wonder if this
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
overclock
No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed.
But as far as I read reviews online it is
Am 16.11.2011 19:05, schrieb masterprometheus:
Oh I would definitly do that (overclock it I mean). But if there
isn't someone with the same name, you've said :
I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
overclock ...
Change of heart ? Understandable as these CPUs are
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:05:55 +0200, masterprometheus wrote:
Yep. So Intel noticed wow, we get a few of them which run stable even
at 100MHz more, let's sell them for some more money ;-)
True but Intel's MSRP was just $10-15 more than a 2600K. Vendors
decided to up the price a bit. Not
Am 16.11.2011 20:23, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
True but Intel's MSRP was just $10-15 more than a 2600K. Vendors
decided to up the price a bit. Not uncommon with new products.
That makes sense, if the old version is only a tenner less than the
new one, no one would buy it, so they get
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in compile
times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
What board did you choose?
Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3
It seemed
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in compile
times, it's almost like using a binary
28 matches
Mail list logo
