On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:11:47 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
I don't myself use cdrecord directly all that often, but I did manage to
remember
cdrecord dev=ATAPI -scanbus
which produced this output:
[snip]
scsibus0:
0,0,0 0) '_NEC' 'DVD_RW ND-2510A ' '2.15'
cdrecord -scanbus dev=ATAPI gives me the following...
scsibus0:
0,0,0 0) 'HITACHI ' 'DVD-ROM GD-5000 ' '0110' Removable CD-ROM
0,1,0 1) 'SONY' 'CD-RW CRX100E ' '1.0m' Removable CD-ROM
0,2,0 2) *
0,3,0 3) *
0,4,0 4) *
0,5,0
Just installed Gentoo 2005.0.
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Is there any way of writing CDs in Gentoo 2005.0?
Govind
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 09 Jun 2005 10:17:30 +0100, Govind Chandra wrote:
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Ignore it. It's only a warning and we have moved on quite a way since 2.5.
--
Neil Bothwick
A woman walked into a bar and asked the barman for a large double
entendre, so
Govind Chandra schreef:
Just installed Gentoo 2005.0.
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Is there any way of writing CDs in Gentoo 2005.0?
Govind
Of course there is... don't you think you'd have heard about it if none
of us could write CD's and DVDs?
At 10:35 AM 6/9/2005, Rob wrote:
At 04:50 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
Govind Chandra schreef:
Just installed Gentoo 2005.0.
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Is there any way of writing CDs in Gentoo 2005.0?
Govind
Of course there is... don't you think
--- Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
procedure, that is, use an ide atapi interface, only
it didn't work out for
me the first time. Any help or advice would be
appreciated.
Hi Rob,
What do you mean it didn't work out? More specific
please. Instead of using the scsibus address like
Rob schreef:
At 10:35 AM 6/9/2005, Rob wrote:
At 04:50 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
Govind Chandra schreef:
Just installed Gentoo 2005.0.
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Is there any way of writing CDs in Gentoo 2005.0?
Govind
Of course there
At 10:55 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
--- Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
procedure, that is, use an ide atapi interface, only
it didn't work out for
me the first time. Any help or advice would be
appreciated.
Hi Rob,
What do you mean it didn't work out? More specific
please. Instead of
Hi Holly,
I was using the 2.6.11 (I believe, but now I'm not sure of the specific rev
level, but it was definitely 2.6.x). I may have just misconfigured
something. But x-cdroast continuously gave me warnings that my performance
would suffer unless I went back to ide-scsi.
Of
Rob schreef:
At 10:55 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
--- Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
procedure, that is, use an ide atapi interface, only
it didn't work out for
me the first time. Any help or advice would be
appreciated.
Hi Rob,
What do you mean it didn't work out? More specific
--- Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for not being specific enough. What I mean
was that by specifying
/dev/hdc as the cd burner, the only program I could
get to work was
x-cdroast. None of the other burner programs that I
emerged and tested
would work with the ATAPI interface. So
Rob schreef:
At 10:55 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
--- Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
procedure, that is, use an ide atapi interface, only
it didn't work out for
me the first time. Any help or advice would be
appreciated.
Hi Rob,
What do you mean it didn't work out? More specific
--- Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually (since I don't use cdrecord often), I noted
down the command I
must use to generate and burn an iso file, so here
the 'burn' section:
cdrecord -v -dao -eject dev=ATAPI:0,0,0
driveropts=burnfree
/wherever/the/file/is.iso
for
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On 09 Jun 2005 10:17:30 +0100, Govind Chandra wrote:
cdrecord -scanbus says there are issues with kernel 2.5 and newer.
Ignore it. It's only a warning and we have moved on quite a way since 2.5.
Indeed. With 2.6, the kernel devs would prefer you to use the
Holly Bostick wrote:
so the correct syntax to access my burner would be
cdrecord dev=0,0,0 whatever comes after that.
The whole /dev/hdc thing is just not correct (it's dev= whatever).
Check the man page for more info.
Actually Holly, both methods should work. I use dev=/dev/cdrw without
Rob wrote:
Hi Holly,
I was using the 2.6.11 (I believe, but now I'm not sure of the
specific rev level, but it was definitely 2.6.x). I may have just
misconfigured something. But x-cdroast continuously gave me warnings
that my performance would suffer unless I went back to ide-scsi.
Holly Bostick wrote:
Rob, I regret to inform you that your syntax seems to be all wrong, and
this stands a good chance of being your problem.
I don't myself use cdrecord directly all that often, but I did manage to
remember
cdrecord dev=ATAPI -scanbus
Last time I checked (2.6.11),
Richard Fish schreef:
Holly Bostick wrote:
so the correct syntax to access my burner would be
cdrecord dev=0,0,0 whatever comes after that.
The whole /dev/hdc thing is just not correct (it's dev= whatever).
Check the man page for more info.
Actually Holly, both methods should work.
19 matches
Mail list logo