Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Netfab, On Thursday, 2020-12-31 18:28:07 +0100, you wrote: > ... > > Anybody having an educated guess what the risk would be? Is it save > > to set a USE flag even if its name is "unsupported"? > > Full story here : > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/710986 Hmmm, not very enlighting either.

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Hi, Le 31/12/20 à 17:54, Dr Rainer Woitok a tapoté : > Anybody having an educated guess what the risk would be? Is it save > to set a USE flag even if its name is "unsupported"? Full story here : https://bugs.gentoo.org/710986

[gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Greetings, after having decided to globally set the "threads" USE flag I get the following: These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sci-libs/hdf5[mpi]" has unmet requirements. -

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

b-r2:0 [-P-] [ -] games-action/fakk2-1.02-r1:0 > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:36:10 > > From: phredus > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Thanks, that would make sense and it is a scenario I had not encountered before. On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:36:10 > From: phredus > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

ate: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:17:08 > From: Neil Bothwick > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:28:44 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Hi, I read the description alre

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

gt; > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 > > From: phredus > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > > > > nocdInstall all files required to run the application wi

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

, phredus wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 >> From: phredus >> Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd >> >> nocd Install all files required to run the app

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Hi, I read the description already and the description has me puzzled. On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 > From: phredus > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > &

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

nocdInstall all files required to run the application without a CD mounted. Here is the whole list: https://gentoo.org/support/use-flags/ Cheers > On Nov 7, 2020, at 4:31 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > What does it enable and what does it disable? >

[gentoo-user] use flag nocd

What does it enable and what does it disable? -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual significant giving.

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag 'split-usr' is now global

On Sunday, 4 August 2019 11:23:20 BST Kai Peter wrote: > Hi, > > now, upstream made the USE flag 'split-usr' global. This puts me a bit > in a state of uncertainty :(. > > What is the reason or goal behind this change? I did read something > about the flag itself but it wasn't really clear to

[gentoo-user] USE flag 'split-usr' is now global

Hi, now, upstream made the USE flag 'split-usr' global. This puts me a bit in a state of uncertainty :(. What is the reason or goal behind this change? I did read something about the flag itself but it wasn't really clear to me. What does this mean: "Enable behavior to support maintaining

[gentoo-user] USE flag enca

Today I received the following from my daily emerge --update !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - media-libs/libass-0.9.11 (Change USE: +enca) - media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20101107 (Change USE: -enca) The instructions are clear enough, but how do I chose

[gentoo-user] USE flag semantic-desktop

Hi, I have been doing a bit of cleaning on my system - namely, removing kde 3.5 packages according to directions given via Gentoo documentation. After doing this, I ran revdep-rebuild (with --pretend) and found that there were a lot of broken packages. One of the problem packages was krecipes.

[gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Hi, I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview with a qt4 GUI. My /etc/portage/package.use contains sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi but when I try to emerge it emerge -vp sci-visualization/paraview I get USE=examples mpi* python threads -doc -hdf5 (-qt4) Why

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:42 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview with a qt4 GUI. My /etc/portage/package.use contains sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi but when I try to emerge it emerge -vp

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Dienstag 12 Mai 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview with a qt4 GUI. My /etc/portage/package.use contains sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi but when I try to emerge it emerge -vp sci-visualization/paraview I get

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 12 Mai 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview with a qt4 GUI. My /etc/portage/package.use contains sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi but when I try to emerge it

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:06:23 Helmut Jarausch wrote: On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: sometimes certain useflags are masked - you can grep PORTDIR/profiles to see if that is your problem. Many thanks (to Albert, as well). I didn't know about that. How can I revert that mask (in

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:06:23 Helmut Jarausch wrote: On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: sometimes certain useflags are masked - you can grep PORTDIR/profiles to see if that is your problem. Many thanks (to Albert, as well). I didn't know

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support because paraview does not work with the unmasked versions

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:54:31 Dale wrote: Now you know he is going to want this even more since it is reported not to work. lol Curiosity you know will get him. If nothing else, he will want to know what it breaks. ;-) Dale Even better is if he fixes it, reports the fix, supplies a

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support because paraview does

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:54:31 Dale wrote: Now you know he is going to want this even more since it is reported not to work. lol Curiosity you know will get him. If nothing else, he will want to know what it breaks. ;-) Dale Even better is if he fixes

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On 12 May, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support because paraview does

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag question

* »Q« ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [14.07.08 01:16]: A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop. As I did... A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx.

[gentoo-user] USE flag question

A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop. A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx. After re-compiling a few things and getting warnings from the

[gentoo-user] USE flag mpm-prefork in apache

Apparently apache2 is built with mpm-prefork if no other mpm USE flag is enabled, even if USE=-mpm-prefork is specified. Wouldn't it be better to either have the emerge fail and instruct the user to enable an mpm or remove the mpm-prefork USE flag entirely? - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:04:45 -0500 Jeremy Olexa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 Aniruddha Shankar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Tandy wrote: Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. right. that is what I meant. if you

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:21:06PM -0500, Penguin Lover Jeremy Olexa squawked: Ryan Tandy wrote: Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things.

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Jeremy Olexa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Tandy wrote: Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. right. that is

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:49, Ryan Tandy wrote: Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. Well, they are both libraries for creating user interfaces. GTK uses X, ncurses uses a terminal. And if Nick prefers to run profuse in the console,

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 09:03, Jure Varlec wrote: On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:49, Ryan Tandy wrote: Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. Well, they are both libraries for creating user interfaces. GTK uses X, ncurses uses a

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 12:04 am, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Nick Rout wrote: On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 Aniruddha Shankar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse,

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:46:07 -0400, David Corbin wrote: and what is the correct way to disable the -gtk flag for all future emerges of a particular ebuild? echo cate-gory/package -gtk /etc/portage/package.use man portage for more info. -- Neil Bothwick Life's what you make it, you can't

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) cheers, K -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Penguin Lover Aniruddha Shankar squawked: Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) I've tried both, and I

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Willie Wong wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Penguin Lover Aniruddha Shankar squawked: Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) I've tried

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 22:29, sean wrote: They both like interesting, I did see some screen shots of profuse, does ufed operate the same? Emerge them and see for yourself. They are really minor... # genlop -t profuse * app-portage/profuse Wed Jun 28 22:39:56 2006

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 Aniruddha Shankar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk)

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 Aniruddha Shankar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] USE flag

I would like to fine tune my USE flags a bit more and have a question. Currently I am emerging gaim, and as it proceeds I see gnome and evolution related items across the screen. I am not running gnome desktop or evolution and could a -gnome and -evolution be placed in USE and would it cause any

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Penguin Lover sean squawked: I would like to fine tune my USE flags a bit more and have a question. Currently I am emerging gaim, and as it proceeds I see gnome and evolution related items across the screen. I am not running gnome desktop or

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

Kevin O'Gorman wrote: I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and thunderbird differing on the flag mozcalendar. It seemed like something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag into /etc/portage/package.keywords: Why did you use that file? What made you use this file,

[gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

I don't know what I'm doing. It seems wise to admit that at the start. Nobody needs to rub my nose in it that way. I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and thunderbird differing on the flag mozcalendar. It seemed like something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag into

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

Kevin O'Gorman wrote: I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and thunderbird differing on the flag mozcalendar. It seemed like something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag into /etc/portage/package.keywords: mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird mozcalendar

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag order confusion

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:54:59 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: Using it on the emerge command line has the desired effect. That is, USE=-sasl emerge -v -p sendmail shows `-sasl' as expected. Why doesn't it work with the entry in /etc/make.conf? What do you get from grep sasl

[gentoo-user] USE flag order confusion

I want to use a global USE flag of -sasl in make.conf. However when I use it there it has no effect on emerges of things that it should effect: I don't have actual output from the commands below because I'm in the throws of an install from scratch and have only ftp for remote access so far. cat

[gentoo-user] USE flag vhosts

Hi, Can someone give me a short explanation (or link) what difference the vhosts flag do to my web-apps? Regards, -- Dan Johansson, http://www.dmj.nu *** This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!