Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

On March 15, 2018 1:14:58 PM UTC, Aleksander Okonski wrote: >Hey Joost, > >Thank you! This was my problem, rebuilt the kernel and then everything >worked smoothly. > >Aleks > >On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:53 PM, J. Roeleveld >wrote: > >> On Thursday,

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

Hey Joost, Thank you! This was my problem, rebuilt the kernel and then everything worked smoothly. Aleks On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:53 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09:23 PM CET Aleksander Okonski wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I have run into a strange

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

Aleksander Okonski wrote: > Hey, > > I have run into a strange problem with my nvidia drivers and gentoo. I am > currently > running kernel 4.14.14 and I upgraded my x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers to 390.42 > from 390.25. > Once the new drivers were installed I rebooted my laptop. Once rebooted I

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

On Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09:23 PM CET Aleksander Okonski wrote: > Hey, > > I have run into a strange problem with my nvidia drivers and gentoo. I am > currently running kernel 4.14.14 and I upgraded my > x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers to 390.42 from 390.25. Once the new drivers were > installed

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Aleksander Okonski wrote: > Hey, > > I have run into a strange problem with my nvidia drivers and gentoo. I am > currently running kernel 4.14.14 and I upgraded my > x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers to 390.42 from 390.25. Once the new drivers

[gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel module API version mismatch

Hey, I have run into a strange problem with my nvidia drivers and gentoo. I am currently running kernel 4.14.14 and I upgraded my x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers to 390.42 from 390.25. Once the new drivers were installed I rebooted my laptop. Once rebooted I was unable to start the xorg server using

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel 3.0

110802 YoYo Siska wrote: On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:35:01AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Has anyone run into a problem trying to compile Nvidia with kernel 3.0 ? AFAIK I have the correct symlink to the kernel source root:602 src ls -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 2 11:04 linux -

[gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel 3.0

Has anyone else run into a problem trying to compile Nvidia with kernel 3.0 ? AFAIK I have the correct symlink to the kernel source root:601 src pwd /usr/src root:602 src ls -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 2 11:04 linux - linux-3.0.0-gentoo/ drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 1648 Dec 14

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia kernel 3.0

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:35:01AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: Has anyone else run into a problem trying to compile Nvidia with kernel 3.0 ? AFAIK I have the correct symlink to the kernel source root:601 src pwd /usr/src root:602 src ls -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 2 11:04

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

Skipping a bunch of stuff that I don't know the answers to... On 7/11/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at man portage, and I am not quite sure about this: Is it possible to unmask the useflag by, for example, writing to /etc/portage/use.mask the line -video_cards_nvidia? Or

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:59:40PM -0700, Penguin Lover Richard Fish squawked: I believe adding -video_cards_nvidia to /etc/portage/profile/use.mask (notice the directory!) should do it. But really this doesn't matter...this use flag is only used to add a dependancy on the nvidia drivers for

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

On 7/12/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see, just one last question about this: so I am assuming that this means that the use flag would allow xorg-x11 to pull in nvidia-drivers as a dependency. All I really need to do then is to emerge nvidia-drivers separately myself? Right.

[gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

A emerge update after a recent sync turns up the following message: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy nvidia-kernel have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (masked by: package.mask) # These

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

On 7/11/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. nv still doesn't do 3D acceleration, right? Yes. 2. Is there more information about what more harm than good means? I tried googling but the only thing I found was a commit log on solar's website with a one-liner about p.masking

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

On 7/11/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. nv still doesn't do 3D acceleration, right? Yes. *Sigh*. Yes, I know I replying to myself 15 seconds after posting, and that is a faux-pas. Sorry. But my response here wasn't clear.

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel p.masked by hardened profile

First, thanks for the pointers. See below On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:08:52PM -0700, Penguin Lover Richard Fish squawked: On 7/11/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Is there more information about what more harm than good means? I tried googling but the only thing I found was a

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Glenn Enright wrote: Nvidia dont release the source for this driver, which makes it difficult for others to patch it, even if they new how the card internals worked ;). As far as I understand, the binary driver itself is not patched. The patching concerns the way it is integrated into your

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Thursday 04 May 2006 09:59, S. Schwartz wrote: Glenn Enright wrote: Nvidia dont release the source for this driver, which makes it difficult for others to patch it, even if they new how the card internals worked ;). As far as I understand, the binary driver itself is not patched. The

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: you don't need 6629 in that case. You can go to 7174. I told you before: any other version (other than 6629) didn't compile or load. And one of the 7something was seriously unstable. So, I would have to go back to 6629. This one just needs a bit of patching. I was

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On 5/3/06, S. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I would have to go back to 6629. This one just needs a bit of patching. I was looking for some help in that direction. You may want to track this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127618 This is probably why none of the 7xxx

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Richard Fish wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127618 Thanks for the link, very interesting indeed. In comment #18 someone says that Nvidia won't release a newer legacy driver set any time soon, whereas in the nVNews-forum someone from NVIDIA Corporation announced that an updated

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Wednesday 03 May 2006 11:08, S. Schwartz wrote: Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: which patches? What would you missing? I don't really know, not even if those would be important to me. But I kind of trust into the work of the Gentoo-guys and believe the gentoo-sources are tested more

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: Besides: ls /usr/portage/sys-kernel/vanilla-sources/ [...] Wow! Couldn't have done that myself. there is A LOT after .15 - many of them with security fixes. I'm not gonna repeat myself (again). Thanks for the suggestion, but for two (already mentioned) reasons I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Thursday 04 May 2006 7:35 am, S. Schwartz wrote: Richard Fish wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127618 Thanks for the link, very interesting indeed. In comment #18 someone says that Nvidia won't release a newer legacy driver set any time soon, whereas in the nVNews-forum

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On 5/3/06, S. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127618 Thanks for the link, very interesting indeed. In comment #18 someone says that Nvidia won't release a newer legacy driver set any time soon, whereas in the nVNews-forum someone

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: is there any reason not to try drver version 8756? 6629 is very old. very, very old. Even older. It is old. As I said, all other available versions in portage didn't compile or load afterwards. Only one version (other than 6629, one of the 1.0.7...) did both

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

is there any reason not to try drver version 8756? 6629 is very old. very, very old. Even older. It is old. As I said, all other available versions in portage didn't compile or load afterwards. Only one version (other than 6629, one of the 1.0.7...) did both successfully but crashed when

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

is there any reason not to try drver version 8756? 6629 is very old. very, very old. Even older. It is old. As I said, all other available versions in portage didn't compile or load afterwards. Only one version (other than 6629, one of the 1.0.7...) did both successfully but crashed when

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Alexander Kirillov wrote: I ran into the same problem after upgrading the kernel to gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3. And don't have any problems with most recent nvidia drivers: media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8756 media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 media-video/nvidia-settings-1.0.20051122-r3 Did you

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:02, Conneries wearegeeks wrote: is there any reason not to try drver version 8756? Yes, twinview doesn't work properly with the 8756 version. I had to fall back to the previous version. the previous version would be 8178 ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 11:51, S. Schwartz wrote: Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: is there any reason not to try drver version 8756? 6629 is very old. very, very old. Even older. It is old. As I said, all other available versions in portage didn't compile or load afterwards. Only one version

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 17:03, S. Schwartz wrote: Alexander Kirillov wrote: I ran into the same problem after upgrading the kernel to gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3. And don't have any problems with most recent nvidia drivers: media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8756 media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756

[gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

Hi, I'm having a problem using nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 after the my recent kernel-update from gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1 to gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3. The few things, that are compiled when emerging nvidia-kernel, compile successfully but emerge complains about missing symboles (remap_page_range

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 01:01, S. Schwartz wrote: Hi, I'm having a problem using nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 after the my recent kernel-update from gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1 to gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3. The few things, that are compiled when emerging nvidia-kernel, compile successfully but

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, It contains =media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 ~x86 =media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8756 ~x86 now. It contained the 8178-r3 version, because I needed it for some purpose, but I don't want to upgrade at every testing ebuild. I just wanted that

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 16:48, Tamas Sarga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel': My /etc/make.profile links to ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/. That's a little bit old

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel McLure wrote: Tamas Sarga wrote: So yes, the ebuild is there, but #equery l -p nvidia-kernel [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0) *

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

What did it? In /etc/portage/ just one file, the package.keywords contains nvidia-kernel. What exactly does /etc/portage/package.keywords contain? It should be: media-video/nvidia-kernel ~x86 -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

On Monday 10 April 2006 16:48, Tamas Sarga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel': My /etc/make.profile links to ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/. That's a little bit old but not deprecated. You might try upgrading, but I really don't think that's

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

JimD wrote: On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote: Hi, I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared from the repository, I

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

Tamas Sarga wrote: So yes, the ebuild is there, but #equery l -p nvidia-kernel [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [ -]

[gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

Hi, I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask. TIA. Tamas

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel

On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote: Hi, I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared from the repository, I don't find it

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel does not load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 (unknown symbols)

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:14 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:41:17 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: But I double-checked anyway and nvidia still has unknown symbols in the latest kernel. I have attached the emerge output from the nvidia build and the emerge info from that

[gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel does not load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 (unknown symbols)

Hi, nvidia-kernel fails to load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2. /var/log/messages below. Best regards, jules Nov 24 13:29:01 omc-2 [ 112.677286] Adding 1004052k swap on /dev/sda3. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1004052k Nov 24 13:29:01 omc-2 [ 115.795192] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel does not load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 (unknown symbols)

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:48:00 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: nvidia-kernel fails to load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2. /var/log/messages below. ### emerge --info # omc-2 ~ # emerge --info Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2,

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel does not load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 (unknown symbols)

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 14:01 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:48:00 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: nvidia-kernel fails to load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2. /var/log/messages below. ### emerge --info # omc-2 ~ # emerge --info Portage 2.0.51.22-r3

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel does not load in 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 (unknown symbols)

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:41:17 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: But I double-checked anyway and nvidia still has unknown symbols in the latest kernel. I have attached the emerge output from the nvidia build and the emerge info from that session too. You're trying to install an old version of the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664??

My solution was to mask the package: # media-video =media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664 =media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.7664 I will try installing it again later. If all else fails, you can try this as well ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664??

Anyone else have trouble with this upgrade? Mine complained about some sort of version mismatch, claiming the last installed was not 1.0.7664 but 1.0.7174? Mike -- Michael W. Holdeman Powered by Gentoo Linux www.gentoo.org | Kernel 2.6.11-ck8

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664??

On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 00:06:06 -0400 Michael W. Holdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else have trouble with this upgrade? Mine complained about some sort of version mismatch, claiming the last installed was not 1.0.7664 but 1.0.7174? Mine went fine with the upgrade on an 2 amd64 and one

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael W. Holdeman wrote: Anyone else have trouble with this upgrade? Mine complained about some sort of version mismatch, claiming the last installed was not 1.0.7664 but 1.0.7174? Mike Yeah a friend of mine is going through this now. I

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel-1.0.7664??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Parrish wrote: Michael W. Holdeman wrote: Anyone else have trouble with this upgrade? Mine complained about some sort of version mismatch, claiming the last installed was not 1.0.7664 but 1.0.7174? Mike Yeah a friend of mine is going