on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Ian Graeme Hilt([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
today and got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Now I have neither of these on my system, so what
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
Hi. The first case is the correct one -- the packages are in
portage, but the version numbers listed are not on the system -- this
is what I meant -- so I have two packages blocking each other the
blocking versions are not on the system at all
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
and got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Hi. The first case is the
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
and got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 John covici([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
and got the following
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:03:29 -0400, John covici wrote:
But now I have still more problems with blocking --
[blocks B ] media-libs/gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.6-r1 (is blocking
media-libs/gstreamer-0.10.19)
[blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking
dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2)
Please show
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
OK, here is the requested output.
These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
installed. Basic ideas of blockers;
The output doesn't mean that you have
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:58:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
installed.
[good stuff snipped]
Two other things that help. You have 228 packages marked for
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:58:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
installed.
[good
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
USE=doc adds extra documentation, usually API information
for programmers, which is why it is rarely needed globally. The doc
flag increases the dependencies of some packages, sometimes
massively.
Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning that.
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
I put the doc flag in there because a number of packages -- and I
can't remember which ones now -- needed it, I think apache was one of
them, so I gave up and did it -- maybe taking it out for the time
being will help things along.
'equery hasuse
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
USE=doc adds extra documentation, usually API information
for programmers, which is why it is rarely needed globally. The
doc flag increases the dependencies of some packages, sometimes
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:16:07 -0400, John covici wrote:
I put the doc flag in there because a number of packages -- and I
can't remember which ones now -- needed it, I think apache was one of
them, so I gave up and did it -- maybe taking it out for the time
being will help things along.
I
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:00:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning that. Now I have horrifying
images burned into my brain of doxygen, openjade, SGML and DTDs
lumbering out of holes in the ground and slithering towards me,
zombie-like, hell bent on devouring
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:45:35 +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning that. Now I have
horrifying images burned into my brain of doxygen, openjade, SGML
and DTDs lumbering out of holes in the ground and slithering
towards me, zombie-like, hell bent on devouring me
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
/me lumbers off in search of mind-altering substances with
depressant side-effects
Just watch TV for a while.
Yeah right :-)
4 possibilities:
SABC 1
SABC 2
SABC 3
eTV
Which would you recommend?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
OK, here is the requested output.
These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
[nomerge ] media-sound/sound-juicer-2.22.0 [2.20.1-r1]
USE=-debug -test (-flac%*) (-ogg%*)
[ebuild U ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r2 [0.10]
USE=X alsa
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
/me lumbers off in search of mind-altering substances with
depressant side-effects
Just watch TV for a while.
Yeah right :-)
4 possibilities:
SABC 1
SABC 2
SABC 3
eTV
Which would
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
[nomerge ] media-sound/sound-juicer-2.22.0 [2.20.1-r1]
USE=-debug -test (-flac%*) (-ogg%*)
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
OK, I will try making all the gst-plugins unstable and see if that
fixes things -- I have been warned not to convert the whole box to
unstable -- is this a correct warning?
Depends how much you adore gentoo and how much time you are willing to
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:15:12 -0400, John covici wrote:
OK, I will try making all the gst-plugins unstable and see if that
fixes things -- I have been warned not to convert the whole box to
unstable -- is this a correct warning?
I don't believe so. Marking a few packages as testing on
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Now I have neither of these on my system, so what is the matter -- is
portage insane? I think I have
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
today and got the following strange message:
[blocks B ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.22.0 (is blocking
dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Looks like you're running unstable. In
26 matches
Mail list logo