Re: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread fire-eyes
John Lange wrote: I'd like to test the newest version of OpenOffice which is 2.0rc1. I have 1.1.4 installed currently. When I do emerge --search openoffice it does not show a 2.0 version as being available. Is this because I need to unmask something or because nothing past 1.1.4 is

RE: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread Dave Nebinger
When I do emerge --search openoffice it does not show a 2.0 version as being available. Is this because I need to unmask something or because nothing past 1.1.4 is available in the ports yet? cornholio configures # eix openoffice * app-office/openoffice-bin Available versions: 1.1.1

RE: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread Dave Nebinger
When I do emerge --search openoffice it does not show a 2.0 version as being available. Is this because I need to unmask something or because nothing past 1.1.4 is available in the ports yet? cornholio configures # eix openoffice * app-office/openoffice-bin Available versions: 1.1.1

Re: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread fire-eyes
fire-eyes wrote: Currently, those are only available with openoffice-bin. I am using 2.0.0rc1 right now. All you need to do is use the appropriate unmask in /etc/portage/package.unmask (you may need to create /etc/portage/ first: =app-office/openoffice-bin-1.9.93 Looks like some clients

Re: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread Antoine
John Lange wrote: I'd like to test the newest version of OpenOffice which is 2.0rc1. I have 1.1.4 installed currently. When I do emerge --search openoffice it does not show a 2.0 version as being available. Is this because I need to unmask something or because nothing past 1.1.4 is available

Re: [gentoo-user] Newest version of OpenOffice (2.0rc1) in portage?

2005-09-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:30:17 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote: Clearly it is out there, but it is hard-masked, which is a fairly good indication that you shouldn't play around with it just yet. I've been using the OOo 2.0 betas for months now, without any problems. It's hard masked because it is a