On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:55:39 -0400, Tom H wrote:
I've never understood the approach of trusting the makefile to
configure your kernel, compile it, compile any number of modules and
install all those modules, but when it comes to copying one file
to /boot, that has to be done manually
On Fri, 22 May 2015 23:29:40 +0100, Mick wrote:
make install does it exactly the way you are doing it, but faster and
less prone to error.
Hmm ... I may have used it the wrong way quite a few years ago, but it
would only keep two kernels at a time or something like that. That
made me
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that
way I know which config goes with which kernel. Everyone has their own
way of doing what works for them. I just prefer to copy my own manually
with a name that makes sense
On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:21:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
I didn't even know about make install until I read this thread, I
always manually copied kernels over.
I have always copied mine over manually too. I keep quite a few spares
laying around, just in case.
Make install only copies the new
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2015 23:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that
way I know which config goes with which kernel.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 23:29:40 +0100, Mick wrote:
make install does it exactly the way you are doing it, but faster and
less prone to error.
Hmm ... I may have used it the wrong way quite a few years ago, but it
would
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that
way I know which config goes with which kernel. Everyone has their own
way of doing what works for them. I just prefer to copy my own manually
with a
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:29:40PM +0100, Mick wrote
On Friday 22 May 2015 23:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
make install does it exactly the way you are doing it, but faster and
less prone to error.
Hmm ... I may have used it the wrong way quite a few years ago, but
it would only keep two
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:21:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
I didn't even know about make install until I read this thread, I
always manually copied kernels over.
I have always copied mine over manually too. I keep quite a few spares
laying around, just in case.
Make install
On Friday 22 May 2015 23:13:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote:
I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that
way I know which config goes with which kernel. Everyone has their own
way of doing what works for them. I just prefer
10 matches
Mail list logo
