On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:37:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
Dovecot will store them where you tell it to. You could have easily
stored them all in a single directory like /var/virtual/mail/user, or
even used a hashed directory scheme (which might be desirable for very
large installations like
On 2010-06-13 6:37 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:20:02 +0200, Tanstaafl wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
On 2010-06-12 5:17 PM, David W Noon wrote:
I wanted the messages to be stored in a single, dedicated
logical volume in my DASD farm
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality up to
date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5?
--
Neil Bothwick
To most people solutions mean
On 2010-06-14 9:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality
up to date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5?
On 2010-06-12 5:17 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On 12 Jun 2010, at 12:35, David W Noon wrote:
... Dovecot, but quickly replaced by dbmail.
Can I ask you why?
Certainly.
I wanted the messages to be stored in a single, dedicated logical
volume in my DASD farm. Dovecot always stored them in
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:20:02 +0200, Tanstaafl wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
On 2010-06-12 5:17 PM, David W Noon wrote:
I wanted the messages to be stored in a single, dedicated logical
volume in my DASD farm. Dovecot always stored them in each user's
~/Mail
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:55:40 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Define better!
Easier to set up, probably.
More flexible,
while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Any better program for that task?
I prefer 'maildrop' for syntax reasons, but I don't claim it's better or worse.
--
/
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:00:01 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote about
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Any better
On Samstag 12 Juni 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Any better program for that task?
not using all that at all
* meino.cra...@gmx.de meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Is there anything you dont like in procmail ?
cu
--
Hi David,
Your setup looks fairly similar to my own, but I am intrigued by the
differences.
On 12 Jun 2010, at 12:35, David W Noon wrote:
... Dovecot, but quickly replaced by dbmail.
Can I ask you why?
I have found the author of Dovecot to be wonderfully responsive,
pushing out a fix
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:40:01 +0200, Stroller wrote about [gentoo-user]
Anything better than procmail?:
Hi David,
Your setup looks fairly similar to my own, but I am intrigued by the
differences.
Okay. I have been using all kinds of software for handling email,
dating back to my OS/2 days in
13 matches
Mail list logo
