Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!--SOLVED

2005-07-26 Thread maxim wexler
a fixboot from the recovery mode of the WinXP CD will be necessary. This should not overwrite the MBR, only the boot loader that is at the beginning of the windows partition. The problem was two-fold: 1. WinXP boot sector was bad(my best guess). 2. Recovery Console suffered from obscure

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-26 Thread Richard Fish
Martins wrote: it is possible with fdisk, i did it and it worked, and this is steps i followed, step 7 wasnt necesary for me: More info about the bug can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzill...g.cgi?id=115980 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzill...g.cgi?id=113201 Note that

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!--SOLVED

2005-07-26 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: everything knocking on wood is cool! Very cool indeednow you can do what we all got computers for in the first place...to play solitaire. ;-) -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Martins Steinbergs
log to linux, erase partition table, get those heads corect, write new partition table -- reboot, LBA is on and win is booting. none of dos/win apps worked for me to fix partition table. i asume LBA is needed only for win itself, not vfat or ntfs partitions, therefore files are accesible from

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Fish
Martins Steinbergs wrote: log to linux, erase partition table, get those heads corect, write new partition table -- reboot, LBA is on and win is booting. none of dos/win apps worked for me to fix partition table. i asume LBA is needed only for win itself, not vfat or ntfs partitions,

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Martins
Um, if you do this, you will more than likely destroy the filesystems as well, because the new partitions will not line up exactly with the old ones. Anyway I don't think this is the problem. Afterall, WinXP booted fine before on this drive with LBA disabled, so something else is up. If

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread maxim wexler
--- Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: log to linux, erase partition table, get those heads corect, write new partition table -- reboot, LBA is on and win is What does this mean? LBA was off before and now it's on? Where? In the POST? dmesg? In the BIOS? fdisk? dos or unix? Also

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Fish
Martins wrote: Um, if you do this, you will more than likely destroy the filesystems as well, because the new partitions will not line up exactly with the old ones. Anyway I don't think this is the problem. Afterall, WinXP booted fine before on this drive with LBA disabled, so

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Martins
it is possible with fdisk, i did it and it worked, and this is steps i followed, step 7 wasnt necesary for me: Fix for the XP dual boot problem * From: Radu Cornea ccradu yahoo com * To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases fedora-test-list redhat com * Subject: Fix for the XP

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-25 Thread Zac Medico
Richard Fish wrote: Martins Steinbergs wrote: log to linux, erase partition table, get those heads corect, write new partition table -- reboot, LBA is on and win is booting. none of dos/win apps worked for me to fix partition table. i asume LBA is needed only for win itself, not vfat or

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-24 Thread Martins Steinbergs
had same problem, solved rebuilding mbr check fdisk, if same problem (16 heads instead of 255 heads) this will help http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user%40lists.gentoo.org/msg07969.html On Monday 25 July 2005 03:39, maxim wexler wrote: Hello everybody, You may recall my tussle with an

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-24 Thread maxim wexler
--- Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: had same problem, solved rebuilding mbr check fdisk, if same problem (16 heads instead of 255 heads) this will help http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user%40lists.gentoo.org/msg07969.html hmm, yes it *is* 16 heads. But before I try this

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-24 Thread Martins Steinbergs
On Monday 25 July 2005 07:35, maxim wexler wrote: --- Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: had same problem, solved rebuilding mbr check fdisk, if same problem (16 heads instead of 255 heads) this will help http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user%40lists.gentoo.org/msg07969.html

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-24 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: --- Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: had same problem, solved rebuilding mbr check fdisk, if same problem (16 heads instead of 255 heads) this will help http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user%40lists.gentoo.org/msg07969.html hmm, yes it *is* 16

Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!

2005-07-24 Thread maxim wexler
there were no succesful winxp boot, because bios didnt enable LBA seting. i dont think (win95)fdisk wil work with linux partitions. Right, but booting a win95/98 CD and running fdisk /mbr from the DOS prompt will usually restore a WinXP boot sector. What's so bizarre in this case is that