On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
getting these messages in my logwatch:
Time Reset
time stepped -0.133773
time stepped -0.662954
time stepped +0.271164
time stepped +0.461200
Brandon Enright wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
getting these messages in my logwatch:
Time Reset
time stepped -0.133773
time stepped -0.662954
time stepped +0.271164
time
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 02:41 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Brandon Enright wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
getting these messages in my logwatch:
Time Reset
time stepped
Brandon Enright wrote:
So from your output a couple issues stick out. You're only peering with
one machine which generally doesn't work so well. You're probably
better off just using ntpdate periodically if you are only going to
sample one server.
Also, the delay on the server you are
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:38, Anthony E. Caudel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] NTP problem':
Brandon Enright wrote:
Well, overnight it only reset twice; - some improvement!
Here is my complete ntp.conf:
# Name of the servers ntpd should sync with
# Please respect
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Brandon Enright wrote:
So from your output a couple issues stick out. You're only peering with
one machine which generally doesn't work so well. You're probably
better off just using ntpdate periodically if you are only going to
sample one server.
Also,
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 13:13, Brandon Enright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about 'RE: [gentoo-user] NTP problem':
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I can't speak for others but my experience with pool.ntp.org has been
very poor. Some of the servers are close by and low latency and others
are in far
On 8/23/05, Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
synchronization works very well.
The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
sync
On 8/23/05, kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That offset looks rather large. NTP really wants to make constant small
changes, not a single huge change. This is why the ntpd setup allows for
an immediate sync via ntpdate before starting the daemon. To fix this
I'd shut down ntpd, run ntpdate
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
synchronization works very well.
The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
sync themselves with this one server. Most of
On 23 August 2005 13:36, Bruno Lustosa wrote:
Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
synchronization works very well.
The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
sync themselves
On 8/23/05, Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/05, kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That offset looks rather large. NTP really wants to make constant small
changes, not a single huge change. This is why the ntpd setup allows for
an immediate sync via ntpdate before starting the
Just as a sidenote. My machine is running dhcpcd, and it sometimes
overwrites /etc/ntp.conf for some reason, even though I have
'dhcpcd_eth0=-N' on /etc/conf.d/net.
I don't know how to make dhcpcd leave /etc/ntp.conf alone OR make it
write a correct ntp.conf (without a bunch of 'restrict' lines).
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Lustosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 August 2005 15:30
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ntp problem
On 8/23/05, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
timeserver 217.160.252.229 3 u 26 64 3770.214
On 8/23/05, Michael Kintzios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you set all the internal clients up as stratum 3, your internal
server as stratum 2 and your external reference timeservers as stratum
1?
No, but do I have to do this manually?
It seems ntp can discover the stratum of the servers by
From:: Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ntp problem
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:50:43 -0300
On 8/23/05, Michael Kintzios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you set all the internal clients up as stratum 3, your internal
server
16 matches
Mail list logo
