On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:49 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
I have to use port 21 because my provider slows everything down as
soon as he
recognizes traffic on any port except those typically in use.
AFAIK the bitrorrent protocol is for ports starting at 6882. It's
likely that clients won't
Hi,
On 6/12/07, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you running something on your end that may be blocking
incoming TCP/21?
Port 21 is the default FTP server, do you have one running?
Mike
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 16:04 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:49 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
I have to use port 21 because my provider slows everything down as
soon as he
recognizes traffic on any port except those typically in use.
AFAIK the bitrorrent protocol is for
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Mike Mazur:
Hi,
On 6/12/07, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you running something on your end that may be blocking
incoming TCP/21?
Port 21 is the default FTP server, do you have one running?
Mike
No.
pgpJCxHcQwEeq.pgp
Description:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:27 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Have you tried running netstat?
netstat
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp0 1 HOMER_GENTOO64.PHHE:ftp 212-87-13-68.sds.:40202
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:27:35 +0200 Florian Philipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you say it works on other setups then it should work also
with Gentoo. Have you tried running netstat?
netstat
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
^^
try
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 16:44 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:27 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Have you tried running netstat?
netstat
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp0
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 16:53 schrieb Hans-Werner Hilse:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:27:35 +0200 Florian Philipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you say it works on other setups then it should work also
with Gentoo. Have you tried running netstat?
netstat
Active Internet
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:17:04 +0200 Florian Philipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tcp 0 0 *:ftp *:* LISTEN
That's it. Now better make sure that you were right when you stated
your provider doesn't block it. BTW, if I as a provider had a no file
sharing policy, I'd definitely block Port
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 17:36 schrieb Hans-Werner Hilse:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:17:04 +0200 Florian Philipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tcp 0 0 *:ftp *:* LISTEN
That's it. Now better make sure that you were right when you stated
your provider doesn't block it. BTW, if I as a
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:09:06 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past Tiscali (my ISP) did not stop file sharing, they just slowed it
down to 10-12k.
Hm, OK. So the port doesn't really matter here... Your tcpdump excerpt
didn't show any incoming connection -- just as I
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 20:09 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo tcpdump -vvns 1600 dst port 21
Password:
tcpdump: listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
1600
bytes
18:37:12.543965 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 64, id 27970, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto:
TCP
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 21:25 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 20:09 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo tcpdump -vvns 1600 dst port 21
Password:
tcpdump: listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
1600
bytes
18:37:12.543965 IP (tos
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 21:12 schrieb Hans-Werner Hilse:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:09:06 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past Tiscali (my ISP) did not stop file sharing, they just slowed
it down to 10-12k.
Hm, OK. So the port doesn't really matter here... Your
14 matches
Mail list logo
