On Saturday 11 Apr 2015 00:08:23 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Back to the original theme, I'd been experimenting with -j and -l make
> options, and I suspect that was my real problem. I finished up with "-j
> -l20" on this i5 box, with startling results - 56 emerges in parallel for
> instance. I suspec
This is a re-send of a message I sent earlier today but which seems not to
have appeared on the list - well, I have changed it a bit:
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 23:19:18 I wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2015 15:02:36 walt wrote:
> > On 04/07/2015 02:48 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 07 Ap
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 15:02:36 walt wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 02:48 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> $ cat make.conf# I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments
> >> #CFLAGS="-O2 -march=core2 -pipe" [1]
> >
> > --->8
> >
> >> [1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Montag, 6. April 2015, 13:29:25 schrieb Martin Vaeth:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >
> >> Moreover, I didn't check before the rebuild, but after
> >> the rebuild there is no 5.20.1 in @INC.
> >
> > Sure about this?
>
> I checked this, of course
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 21:53:35 schrieb Martin Vaeth:
> Moreover, I didn't check before the rebuild, but after
> the rebuild there is no 5.20.1 in @INC.
> (So it might be even the case that the rebuild is *necessary*).
>
Sure about this?
huet
5 matches
Mail list logo
