Kevin O'Gorman schreef:
Thaks, all -- I now have a new Java, and know about a few new
utilities. But I'm probably still in trouble. The rest at the bottom.
On 6/14/05, Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:21:33
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:47:04 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
Interesting... eix is nice, but apparently not perfect. If I search 'eix
java', neither blackdown nor Sun comes up (no jre's, actually). But a
search of 'eix jre' produces:
That's because eix searches on the package name by default. Use
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:52:44 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
1) I thought java 1.5 wasn't there because it was not found by
emerge -s java
emerge -s jre
emerge -s blackdown
emerge -av eix
Not only is eix much faster than emerge -s but it also shows masked
packages.
--
Neil
Neil Bothwick schreef:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:52:44 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
1) I thought java 1.5 wasn't there because it was not found by
emerge -s java
emerge -s jre
emerge -s blackdown
emerge -av eix
Not only is eix much faster than emerge -s but it also shows
Thaks, all -- I now have a new Java, and know about a few new
utilities. But I'm probably still in trouble. The rest at the bottom.
On 6/14/05, Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:21:33 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I got Java 1.5 to install. Now the nifty new tools (thanks for eix!)
tell me that 1.5 is all I have. Of course, when I look in /opt, I get
a different impression of things. Am I right in surmising that
I have all those old versions, and I just need java-config to
On 6/14/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I got Java 1.5 to install. Now the nifty new tools (thanks for eix!)
tell me that 1.5 is all I have. Of course, when I look in /opt, I get
a different impression of things. Am I right in surmising that
I have
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On 6/14/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I got Java 1.5 to install. Now the nifty new tools (thanks for eix!)
tell me that 1.5 is all I have. Of course, when I look in /opt, I get
a different impression of things. Am I right in surmising
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Here's what it looks like:
treat 1.5-bundles # emerge -av sun-jdk sun-sdk-docs
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies -
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0*
have been masked.
!!! One of the
Zac Medico schreef:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Here's what it looks like:
treat 1.5-bundles # emerge -av sun-jdk sun-sdk-docs
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies -
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0*
have been masked.
!!! One
Holly Bostick wrote:
You also have to echo to /etc/portage/package.keywords-- both packages
are twice-masked.
So in addition to the above:
echo dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
echo dev-java/java-sdk-docs ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
Silly me, I have
As I pointed out before, I already did those. Again, here are 'cat's
of the files,
which nevertheless do not allow an emerge:
treat 1.5-bundles # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-office/gnucash quotes
dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86
dev-java/sun-jre-bin ~x86
treat 1.5-bundles # cat
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
As I pointed out before, I already did those. Again, here are 'cat's
of the files,
which nevertheless do not allow an emerge:
treat 1.5-bundles # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-office/gnucash quotes
dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86
dev-java/sun-jre-bin ~x86
treat
Zac Medico schreef:
Holly Bostick wrote:
You also have to echo to /etc/portage/package.keywords-- both packages
are twice-masked.
So in addition to the above:
echo dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
echo dev-java/java-sdk-docs ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
Kevin O'Gorman schreef:
As I pointed out before, I already did those. Again, here are 'cat's
of the files,
which nevertheless do not allow an emerge:
treat 1.5-bundles # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-office/gnucash quotes
dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86
dev-java/sun-jre-bin ~x86
treat
On 6/13/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
As I pointed out before, I already did those. Again, here are 'cat's
of the files,
which nevertheless do not allow an emerge:
treat 1.5-bundles # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-office/gnucash quotes
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On 6/13/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
As I pointed out before, I already did those. Again, here are 'cat's
of the files,
which nevertheless do not allow an emerge:
treat 1.5-bundles # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-office/gnucash
Kevin O'Gorman schreef:
Thanks, I *did* miss that. Unfortunately, it doesn't fix the problem.
Below, I try an emerge, then dump the files again.
Maybe I missed two things?
Yes. You've unmasked (in /etc/portage/package.unmask) a specific version
of the docs (1.4.99, because you used an =
Holly Bostick wrote:
Yes. You've unmasked (in /etc/portage/package.unmask) a specific version
of the docs (1.4.99, because you used an = sign, and a version number).
However, you're trying to install version 1.5.0 whatever, which you have
not unmasked.
That's what I though for a moment
Zac Medico schreef:
Holly Bostick wrote:
Yes. You've unmasked (in /etc/portage/package.unmask) a specific version
of the docs (1.4.99, because you used an = sign, and a version number).
However, you're trying to install version 1.5.0 whatever, which you have
not unmasked.
That's what
Holly Bostick wrote:
I thought of that possibility after I hit 'Send' oh well. You may
have won this round, but I'll be back (saw Austin Powers 3 tonight, so
insert Trademarked Evil Laugh here)!
Holly, hoping that Kevin actually can get the docs installed, despite
this foolish
21 matches
Mail list logo
