Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-25 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 12.12.2009 22:18, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 12.12.2009 21:56, schrieb Joshua Murphy: Anytime, and glad to hear that you're back up and working happily again! :) old phenomenon: post solved and it crashes again ... Just for reference: emerged slim instead of gdm now ... works.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-12 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 11.12.2009 19:15, schrieb Joshua Murphy: I am now trying to use your solution, I just have to find a way to make it work with my pam_mount-based setup. Working on it ;-) Hmm... that'd certainly complicate it... since mine bypasses any auth of the user ;) Played around with it, then

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-12 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 11.12.2009 19:15, schrieb Joshua Murphy: I am now trying to use your solution, I just have to find a way to make it work with my pam_mount-based setup. Working on it ;-) Hmm... that'd certainly complicate it...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-12 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 12.12.2009 21:56, schrieb Joshua Murphy: Anytime, and glad to hear that you're back up and working happily again! :) old phenomenon: post solved and it crashes again ...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-11 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy: Respawns on close/crash... doesn't allow attempts to start more than once (hence the 'lockfile' type hack in the script), doesn't break on a stale lockfile, and does whatever the user ('myuser' should be replaced with a real username) wishes in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-11 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy: Respawns on close/crash... doesn't allow attempts to start more than once (hence the 'lockfile' type hack in the script), doesn't break on a stale lockfile, and does

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-10 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy: # auto_start_x.sh Thanks for that! I will maybe set that up but shouldn't gdm work as well? I mean it doesn't crash for *all* ~x86-users, correct? ;-) Stefan

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-10 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy: # auto_start_x.sh Thanks for that! I will maybe set that up but shouldn't gdm work as well? I mean it doesn't crash for *all* ~x86-users, correct? ;-) Stefan I'd expect

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-09 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 09.12.2009 16:31, schrieb walt: So it seems more gdm/gnome-related to me, right? That would be my guess. I don't use gdm so I don't know how to fix it. I use startx with exec /etc/X11/Sessions/gnome in my ~/.xinitrc. You could try that to see if gnome starts correctly. Yep, that works!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-09 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 09.12.2009 16:31, schrieb walt: So it seems more gdm/gnome-related to me, right? That would be my guess.  I don't use gdm so I don't know how to fix it. I use startx with exec /etc/X11/Sessions/gnome in my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11

2009-12-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 09.12.2009 01:24, schrieb walt: Looks to me like the X server *is* running, unless you left out the error message at the end of the log. No, nothing left out. Why do you say X didn't come up? Because it says so. I get that dialog X-Server could not be started (similar, I get the msg