fe...@crowfix.com schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
sent at 12h15 a mail faking hist email address to
gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick...
Now i think
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote:
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's
auto-responder is so hideously broken.
IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 11:25:41 KH wrote:
fe...@crowfix.com schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
sent at 12h15 a mail faking hist email address to
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:34:11 +0200, KH wrote:
IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail
to any address in a day? I use a procmail rule to take care of this,
it appears after list filtering
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Unsubscribing the user will have reduced the traffic he is causing by a
significant margin.
And give the list admins breathing space in which to add a rule to
silently drop messages from that address.
I suppose what we really need is a
To answer you question: It depends.
I was responding to a statement that any kind of auto-responder is wrong,
so it depends is not allowed :)
so the correct answer is: NO. :-)
Another use it to let people know that their mail has been received. I
company I do work for has an
Neil Bothwick:
I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by
auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such
mails.
In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps.
Whoever is able to configure an auto-responder in such a completely
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:15:30 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by
auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such
mails.
In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps.
Whoever is able to
On 29.04.2009 14:30, Neil Bothwick wrote:
In fact, all that's needed is already there (just the other way round,
though): every list I'm subscribed to adds a Precedence header field
(with values of bulk or list) to the messages. A sane auto-responder
will not send replies to messages
zhen schrieb:
Hi.
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
I called his company and they promissed to stop it
The list admins have been notified - you can track the issue at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/267740
AllenJB
zhen wrote:
Hi.
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:46:46 +0400, zhen wrote:
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
A bug report has already been filed, we'll just have
Yes, moderating him.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:46, zhen z...@dotcomltd.ru wrote:
Hi.
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
Best regards,
Where is the moderation? Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond
on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to
every mail sended to him.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:06, Daniel de Oliveira akulatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:10:45 -0300, Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Where is the moderation?
This list is not moderated.
Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond
on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to
every mail sended to him.
It's more a case of a broken
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
Jarry
--
___
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists!
Everything else is
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
Jarry
you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time.
Did you?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
sent at 12h15 a mail faking hist email address to
gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the
When I say to moderate him its just for a little time, not life-time.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:29, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder
is so hideously broken.
--
Neil Bothwick
Nostalgia
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time.
Did you?
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder
is so hideously broken.
IMHO, setting
Toppost due to iPhone. I just made a measure through gmail to block
the source of the epic-spammed autoreplies.
On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote:
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's
auto-responder is so hideously broken.
IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail to
any
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
sent at 12h15 a mail faking hist email address to
gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick...
Now i think he is spammed with you're not
25 matches
Mail list logo
