Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread Jeremi Piotrowski
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Do you bother with the gentoo patches? Only the Kconfig patch that gives quick access to gentoo required configs is really useful, the rest I would call minor. If you copy your config from gentoo-sources to the git tree,

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread covici
Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they > > > were going to change that. I tend to just

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they > > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of > > the kernel tree and checkout from

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread Tuomo Hartikainen
On 2015-10-08 07:50, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they > > > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman: > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of > the kernel tree and checkout from tags. I never really understood what difference the gentoo-patches make.

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-08 Thread Dale
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman: > >> Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they >> were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of >> the kernel tree and checkout from tags. > I never really understood what

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread covici
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > > Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK, > > ... > > how > > do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other > > means? Can I do a

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK, > ... > how > do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other > means? Can I do a console over the network without additional

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will >> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread covici
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > >> > > >> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread covici
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > > > > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will > > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19 > > was the first version where btrfs

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel panick in 4.2.1 from gentoo-sources

2015-10-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19 > was the first version where btrfs actually worked, and I have 3.18 here, > this is