Re: [gentoo-user] insufficient emerge -t output
On 4/13/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:16:10 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: [ebuild N] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.4.2.1 USE=kerberos ldap ssl -debug -doc -ipv6 -krb4 -nntp 13,900 kB Do you have evolution installed? If so, that depends on lots of gnome stuff. no, I don't have evoliution installed. The eds USE flag brings in evolution-data-server, and a ton of GNOME deps. thank you, I added -eds to make.conf, and update list became clear. openoffice was compiled with -eds, but default probably somehow changed few days ago. But shouldn't portage had noticed this change only then recompiling openoffice or doing --newuse, not when I do --update world? I thought use flags are only considered during compile. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] dialup + IPv6?
On Friday 14 April 2006 04:10, Sven Köhler wrote: I think, that 6to4 would be right for me. If i do a traceroute to the 192.88.99.1 (the host, that all the 6to4 packets goto), i get contact after really few hops. Great! I'm facing many many questions. My friend is telling me, that in theory, i would be abled to use IPv6 addresses based on the 6to4-address of the IPv4 address of my ppp0 - but that changes every 24 hours. A MASQ-target seems not to be available for IPv6 - so if my router disconnects/reconnets, all the computers in my LAN will have to change their IPv6 address. Are you using radvd or some other advertising daemon? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Font rendering broken in GNOME and GTK2 apps ...
* Johám-LuÃs Miguéns Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-13 23:00:57 +0200]: On 21:16 Thu 13 Apr , Marc Koschewski wrote: * Johám-LuÃs Miguéns Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-13 20:49:50 +0200]: Well, here the issue was solved by downgrading xorg-server. Now, I'm running: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.99.2 I'm running 1.0.99.2 ... :( Marc Sorry, I meant x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3. I unmasked xorg modular to try it, but forgot to clean /etc/portage/package.unmask when it reached ~x86 (which is what I'm using). OK, I'll give it a try and report. Marc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Adaptec 1420SA
Hello! Does somebody have any experience with $SUBJECT? I bought this card and downloaded the driver from Adaptec website. I tried to merge it into my kernel tree, but during the merge I got error message: # ./Build ../driver-aar81xx/ ../shipped-binary ../../linux-2.6.15-gentoo-r1 merge_driver=Yes blist=NULL, build job terminated . Okay, I tried another way: ./Build ../driver-aar81xx/ ../shipped-binary ../../linux-2.6.15-gentoo-r1 merge_driver=Yes blist+=i386 cp: cannot stat `/usr/src/adaptec/shipped-binary/host_raid.o.aar81xx.AuthenticAMD.3.3.5-20050130': No such file or directory subdir-$(CONFIG_SCSI_AAR81XX) += aar81xx Please remember to run make menuconfig and hand pick AAR81XX in device drivers/scsi/low level drivers. Attention Fedora 3 users: If you plan to build kernel image based on configs/kernel-2.6.9-ix86*.config then you need to do this: cp /usr/src/adaptec/shipped_modules/host_raid.o.adpsata.ix86.3.4.2 /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-1.667/drivers/scsi/adpsata/host_raid.o_shipped . I still got error during the merge, but the driver source merged into the kernel. Then I tried to compile the new kernel module, but I got this error: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `drivers/scsi/aar81xx/host_raid.s', needed by `drivers/scsi/aar81xx/host_raid.o'. Stop. make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/aar81xx] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers/scsi] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 I'm using kernel 2.6.15-gentoo-r1. What did I wrong? Thank you for your help in advance, Istvan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Font rendering broken in GNOME and GTK2 apps ...
* Marc Koschewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 10:56:28 +0200]: * Johám-LuÃs Miguéns Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-13 23:00:57 +0200]: On 21:16 Thu 13 Apr , Marc Koschewski wrote: * Johám-LuÃs Miguéns Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-13 20:49:50 +0200]: Well, here the issue was solved by downgrading xorg-server. Now, I'm running: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.99.2 I'm running 1.0.99.2 ... :( Marc Sorry, I meant x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3. I unmasked xorg modular to try it, but forgot to clean /etc/portage/package.unmask when it reached ~x86 (which is what I'm using). OK, I'll give it a try and report. Marc OK, I reverted to =x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3 and it works as expected. Thanks anyone. ;) Marc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] reiserfs troubles
On Friday 14 April 2006 03:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: If you have smart enabled (and you should have) and smartmontools installed (you should have done that too), smart can tell you, if it is a hardware problem (which is pretty probably the cause of the problem). Thank you very much for the pointer. I had never heard of this before but it is definitely going on it the future.. It confirms that the disc has 39 bad blocks so now I am reading the faq to figure out how to deal with this. :) Back up everything... As stated in the original post I am trying to. But when I try to copy everything to an external harddrive after some time the external harddrive is disconnected. I am not sure if this is a separate issue or if it happens as a result of too many errors on my system disk. Anyway I have backed up everything that cannot be replaced so first I will deal with the bad blocks and then if the problem remains I will probably tar everything up to my server via ssh.. PS. This mail is signed. Can anyone verify the signature? [...] Thanks to you and Boyd for your replies on this too. From Boyd's post I am guessing that it works as well as it can work and from yours I am guessing that it needs some more configuration than you have done. Not sure though.. -- Bo Andresen pgp7xKx1qDZGV.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] !!! ERROR: app-text/opensp-1.5.1 failed w hen emerge gnome
Hi everybody! This is my emerge message when emerge gnome2.14. # emerge -D gnome Calculating dependencies... done! Emerging (1 of 176) app-text/opensp-1.5.1 to / checksums files ;-) opensp-1.5.1.ebuild checksums files ;-) files/opensp-1.5-gcc34.patch checksums files ;-) files/digest-opensp-1.5.1 checksums files ;-) files/opensp-1.5.1-gcc41.patch checksums src_uri ;-) OpenSP-1.5.1.tar.gz Unpacking source... Unpacking OpenSP-1.5.1.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/opensp-1.5.1/work * Applying opensp-1.5-gcc34.patch ... [ ok ] * Applying opensp-1.5.1-gcc41.patch ... [ ok ] Source unpacked. Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/opensp-1.5.1/work/OpenSP-1.5.1 ... * econf: updating OpenSP-1.5.1/config.guess with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.gu ess * econf: updating OpenSP-1.5.1/config.sub with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --inf odir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var /lib --enable-http --enable-default-catalog=/etc/sgml/catalog --enable-default-s earch-path=/usr/share/sgml --datadir=/usr/share/sgml/opensp-1.5.1 --enable-nls - -build=i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc accepts -g... yes checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc3 checking how to run the C preprocessor... i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -E checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++... i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++... gcc3 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -E checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c checking whether ln -s works... yes checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) no checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-nm -B checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking command to parse /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-nm -B output... ok checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip checking for objdir... .libs checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc supports -c -o file.lo... yes checking if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... yes checking whether the linker (/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld) supports shared libr aries... yes checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no creating libtool checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes checking for msgfmt...
Re: [gentoo-user] Help : mc and ln mixup
Bo Andresen wrote: Rohit replies -- Thanks, both of you, for your response. I am re-emerging coreutils, just in case. Done. The commands are below - and in summary here is what happens. - PATH is shown. My own .bin directory has two mp3 ripping scripts. That is all. /usr/bin comes before /bin in PATH - /bin/ln is a proper executable. /usr/bin/ln and /usr/bin/mc are both symlinks to /bin/ln [Not good] - Removed mc from /usr/bin and /usr/bin/ln disappears as well [Not good] Then which ln shoes /bin/ln and which mc shows no mc. - Creation of symlink /usr/bin/ln automatically creates symlink /usr/bin/mc - pointing to /bin/ln [thus affecting my midnight commander]. Both symlinks have same inode number on my filesystem. Also note that I do not have another definition of ln as an alias. This may be a filesystem inconsistency. I would consider an fsck for reiserfs and may be a rebuiltree. What do you say? Please help. Thanks, Rohit Ps - Commands follow. Please look at the following. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo $PATH /home/rohit/.bin:/usr/games/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/home/rohit/.bin:/usr/games/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4.5:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/bin:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/jre/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin:/usr/kde/3.4/bin:/usr/games/bin:/opt/limewire:/home/oracle/product/10.1.0.3/bin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cd /bin [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin $ md5sum ln 95d3db99e446dfe4cf95abbd04b60c75 ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin $ ls -l ln -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27756 Apr 14 12:39 ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin $ cd /usr/bin [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ md5sum ln 95d3db99e446dfe4cf95abbd04b60c75 ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -l ln lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 14 12:39 ln - /bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ md5sum mc 95d3db99e446dfe4cf95abbd04b60c75 mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -l mc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 14 12:39 mc - /bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ file mc mc: symbolic link to `/bin/ln' [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ rm mc rm: remove symbolic link `mc'? y rm: cannot remove `mc': Permission denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ sudo rm mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ls -l mc ls: mc: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -l ln ls: ln: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ which ln /bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ which mc which: no mc in (/home/rohit/.bin:/usr/games/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/home/rohit/.bin:/usr/games/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4.5:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/bin:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/jre/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin:/usr/kde/3.4/bin:/usr/games/bin:/opt/limewire:/home/oracle/product/10.1.0.3/bin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ sudo /bin/ln -s /bin/ln ./ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ sudo /bin/ln -s /bin/ln ./ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ which mc /usr/bin/mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ which ln /usr/bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -i ln mc 300 ln 300 mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -li ln mc 300 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 14 12:48 ln - /bin/ln 300 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 14 12:48 mc - /bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin $ ls -li /bin/ln 34560 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27756 Apr 14 12:39 /bin/ln [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ alias ln bash: alias: ln: not found -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] reiserfs troubles
On Apr 14, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Bo Andresen wrote: On Friday 14 April 2006 03:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: If you have smart enabled (and you should have) and smartmontools installed (you should have done that too), smart can tell you, if it is a hardware problem (which is pretty probably the cause of the problem). Thank you very much for the pointer. I had never heard of this before but it is definitely going on it the future.. It confirms that the disc has 39 bad blocks so now I am reading the faq to figure out how to deal with this. :) Back up everything... As stated in the original post I am trying to. But when I try to copy everything to an external harddrive after some time the external harddrive is disconnected. I am not sure if this is a separate issue or if it happens as a result of too many errors on my system disk. Anyway I have backed up everything that cannot be replaced so first I will deal with the bad blocks and then if the problem remains I will probably tar everything up to my server via ssh.. as the others said, start digging a grave for this drive. Had a drive doing the same thing on a production box for a few months, phbs waited till it just died to order the replacement. these kinds of errors are warning signs of impending doom. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Way OT - Can user apache become other users?
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 22:29 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote: If the shell assigned to user 'apache' is /bin/false, can user apache become other users via su or sudo? What I want to do is create a web-based website editor, similar to the one geocities.com offers. I need a way to store the website editor in a central location where it will be available to all users, but the users need to be able to save the files they create/edit in their own web space (in this case under ~/webspace/html). I want the users to be able to log in with their Linux usernames and passwords. Ive written to a couple of PHP lists about this, but none of them have answered me. Is there anything in portage that will do this, so I don't have to write it myself? I've waded through a lot of descriptions of scripts other people have written, but none of them seemed to allow authenticating against the users and passwords already established on the system... Someone on one of my PHP lists wrote back and told me that I needed to make php with phpsuexec, but I don't see that as one of the USE flags. Is it called something else in Gentoo? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] reiserfs troubles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0xF3F90A1339B034DA). The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown. That's what kmail says to me. Looks ok to me: OpenPGP Security Info UNTRUSTED Good signature from Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 0x39B034DA / Signed on: 04/14/2006 12:59 AM Key fingerprint: 5213 200F D0A9 05B1 83BB BF00 F3F9 0A13 39B0 34DA I get the same for yours: OpenPGP Security Info UNTRUSTED Good signature from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 0xB8435D3A / Signed on: 04/14/2006 04:37 AM Key fingerprint: D52D 87C4 314F C51F 8E78 C5C5 ABBD A70D B843 5D3A Thunderbird - Enigmail -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEP/Y7Ct0ZF9kLPvYRAgDkAJ9/QsyNof+/1mbTZmrMYkD92E5K9gCeIMf1 E9ZiXbYWfyQaYPNoz8WDY30= =fWDT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did some homework, did some Google searches, and figured out how to sign my email with Kgpg. I configured KMail, during which I came to the conclusion that spamassassin needs to be left serverside - importing ~8,000 messages from GMail while spamassassin tried to scan them all was an absolute nightmare which ultimately involved emerge --unmerge spamassassin. Anyways, since it's totally impractical to try and get all of you people to a formal key signing, I'm hoping you'll take my word for this and trust that this key which I sign my message with now is THE key I intend to use for as long as I can get away with. Hopefully this will help with that total nut case who was impersonating my email! Just a follow-up on that guy. I think that he's a spammer, testing his capability at phishing by spoofing off of other people's domains and their email. My best guess is that he picked me as a target, since I am a rather salient participant in many mailing lists, just to make sure he could properly spoof off of other domains, thus allowing him to do more sinister things than try and make me to a double-take when I find something that looks like I emailed it to myself in my inbox! Thanks for your patience in this matter, and I hope that we can all continue to work towards a web where we don't need spamassassin or gpg. I know I am. Hi, Why not use a keyserver to keep your key, there are enough of them ;) GnuPG can be setup to use one or more keyservers (same for Kmail,TB,Evo) Plus configure it the auto-fetch new/unknown keys, then forget about it. HTH.Rumen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEP/RANbtuTtsWD3wRAvEFAKCDqHJg+cJP5Q4cdO5lsGAw3mLtMACgnubc 7drNWDORHiOTIBTomtBvTkA= =Aqxt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
On Friday 14 April 2006 12:13 pm, Rumen Yotov wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did some homework, did some Google searches, and figured out how to sign my email with Kgpg. I configured KMail, during which I came to the conclusion that spamassassin needs to be left serverside - importing ~8,000 messages from GMail while spamassassin tried to scan them all was an absolute nightmare which ultimately involved emerge --unmerge spamassassin. Anyways, since it's totally impractical to try and get all of you people to a formal key signing, I'm hoping you'll take my word for this and trust that this key which I sign my message with now is THE key I intend to use for as long as I can get away with. Hopefully this will help with that total nut case who was impersonating my email! Just a follow-up on that guy. I think that he's a spammer, testing his capability at phishing by spoofing off of other people's domains and their email. My best guess is that he picked me as a target, since I am a rather salient participant in many mailing lists, just to make sure he could properly spoof off of other domains, thus allowing him to do more sinister things than try and make me to a double-take when I find something that looks like I emailed it to myself in my inbox! Thanks for your patience in this matter, and I hope that we can all continue to work towards a web where we don't need spamassassin or gpg. I know I am. Hi, Why not use a keyserver to keep your key, there are enough of them ;) GnuPG can be setup to use one or more keyservers (same for Kmail,TB,Evo) Plus configure it the auto-fetch new/unknown keys, then forget about it. HTH.Rumen I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or three - I don't remember exactly) servers which I wasn't able to upload to. The important thing is that I think I got through the process correctly. If I missed something please tell me. pgpDXPbR5n5WJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or three - I don't remember exactly) servers which I wasn't able to upload to. The important thing is that I think I got through the process correctly. If I missed something please tell me. Signature is fine (imported automatically here), and don't worry about the key servers, most of them sync with eachother ;-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEQBX1Ct0ZF9kLPvYRAilpAKCKR687gzCL1HWd9bT437gmwAJGlACfRwLa WLmImki5DR6/AE5BJair1DM= =Yv+n -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] wireless question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I try to setup a wireless card to my gentoo box, but I can't set it: the net is with a wpa-key (type tkip). The SSID is Super S and when I configure it so: #iwconfig wlan0 essid my SSID nick Cinzia key wep-key after that I read with iwconfig: # iwconfig wlan0 wlan0 IEEE 802.11b+/g+ ESSID:my SSID Mode:Managed Channel:1 Access Point: 00:00:80:F9:37:03 Bit Rate:268.501 Mb/s Tx-Power:268500993 Sensitivity:24937 Retry:on Fragment thr=256 B Encryption key:------xx Security mode:restricted Power Management:on But if I do #dhcpd wlan0 the card doesn't try to contact the router (no log) and in dmesg: #dmesg updating initial settings on iface activation get_mask 0x, set_mask 0x0006CEBC important setting has been changed. Need to update packet templates, too updating packet templates updating transmit power: 15 dBm updating antenna value: 0x4A updating Energy Detect (ED) threshold: 0 acx111 doesn't support ED! updating Channel Clear Assessment (CCA) value: 0x00 acx111 doesn't support CCA! updating channel to: 1 updating: enable Tx updating: enable Rx on channel: 1 updating regulatory domain: 0x30 updating WEP key settings setting WEP key: 0 with total size: 13 setting WEP key 0 as default acx_set_status(1):SCANNING starting radio scan get_mask 0x, set_mask 0x - after update ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (1 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (2 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (3 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (4 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (5 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (6 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) stopping scan no matching station found in range yet acx_set_status(1):SCANNING starting radio scan rx: unsupported 802.11 protocol rx: unsupported 802.11 protocol acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (1 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (2 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (3 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (4 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (5 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (6 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) stopping scan no matching station found in range yet acx_set_status(1):SCANNING starting radio scan rx: unsupported 802.11 protocol acx: truncated rx header (-1656 bytes)! rx: unsupported 802.11 protocol acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (1 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (2 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (3 sec) acx_i_timer: adev-status=1 (SCANNING) continuing scan (4 sec) It is a card problem and a setup problem? The card uses experimental acx driver (it is a AVM Fritz! WLAN USB) Thanks a lot, Luigi - -- Public key GPG(0x633F86B7) on http://keyserver.linux.it/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEP/x+HmkkjmM/hrcRAtxDAJ0YMZxXmjQax5BMFAV49aaCaLrvTACfVKen D8O1UUSA0ctlJFUwiTdUmlA= =4cQv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
Ralph Slooten wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or three - I don't remember exactly) servers which I wasn't able to upload to. The important thing is that I think I got through the process correctly. If I missed something please tell me. Signature is fine (imported automatically here), and don't worry about the key servers, most of them sync with eachother ;-) I tried to set mine up but couldn't get anywhere with it. Then I moved and changed email addresses anyway so I have no clue where to start. All that said, where is that guide you were using?? I need one if I am going to set this up for mine too. Thanks Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] I'd really like to stay with you
On Friday 14 April 2006 17:11, Franta wrote: ... but THIS is impossible [blocks B ] sys-apps/coldplug (is blocking sys-fs/udev-089-r2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-drivers/xf86-input-elographics-1.0.0.5) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xproto-7.0.4) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-misc/util-macros-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/inputproto-1.3.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libX11-1.0.0-r2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/bigreqsproto-1.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXau-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xf86bigfontproto-1.1.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXdmcp-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xcmiscproto-1.1.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/xtrans-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXext-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXxf86misc-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xf86miscproto-0.9.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/liblbxutil-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXrender-0.9.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/renderproto-0.9.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/dmxproto-2.2.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/damageproto-1.0.3) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/resourceproto-1.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXres-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xf86dgaproto-2.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/videoproto-2.2.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/fixesproto-4.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXt-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libICE-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libSM-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXpm-3.5.4.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXaw-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXmu-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/trapproto-3.4.3) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXtst-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/recordproto-1.13.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xineramaproto-1.1.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-apps/rgb-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-apps/iceauth-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-misc/makedepend-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/glproto-1.4.6) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-libs/mesa-6.4.2-r2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/printproto-1.0.3) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/xf86driproto-2.0.3) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXxf86vm-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXi-1.0.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libdrm-2.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-fonts/font-adobe-75dpi-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-apps/mkfontscale-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libfontenc-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-apps/mkfontdir-1.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-fonts/encodings-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-fonts/font-util-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-apps/bdftopcf-1.0.0) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXfont-1.1.0-r1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/fontsproto-2.0.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-proto/fontcacheproto-0.1.2) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-fonts/font-alias-1.0.1) [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.9
Re: [gentoo-user] I'd really like to stay with you
quoth the Franta: ... but THIS is impossible ... hope I've copied it right ... then goes the REALLY upgrade .. All of X blocks all and everything of X. That's really amazing. That's what I ever wanted Linux to be!!! Thank you GGEENNTTOO team !()! It WAS great, but it really isn't for usage. Well, I could say: THAT'S UNUSABLE. Thank's onesmore Frank So what do you want? Ennio Morricone to play you off into the sunset? If you want modular Xorg it stands to reason you will have to remove the monolithic version first. If you don't want it then you have no business running '~x86'. Have fun in your new endeavors... -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org ...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected... - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 pgpSL0TiBneTT.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] eth0 and eth1 unwanted autoconfiguration
Hello all, Does anyone know why my eth0 (wired) and eth1 (wireless) interfaces are getting started and autoconfigured at boot despite not being present at any runlevel in rc-update? They are getting configured with the settings in conf.d/net, whether or not eth0 has a cable plugged in, and whether or not the firmware is loaded for eth1 (it is a PCMCIA device). Obviously, these settings are bunk... I am not sure what info I should put here to diagnose this: gentoo-sources-2.6.14-r5 baselayout-1.12.0_pre16-r3 Again, net.eth0 and net.eth1 are not shown at _any_ runlevel when I run 'rc-update -s'. thanks, -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org ...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected... - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 pgprUeI4I8600.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] I'd really like to stay with you
Franta wrote: ... but THIS is impossible snip All of X blocks all and everything of X. That's really amazing. That's what I ever wanted Linux to be!!! Thank you GGEENNTTOO team !()! It WAS great, but it really isn't for usage. Well, I could say: THAT'S UNUSABLE. Thank's onesmore Frank Standard procedure for resolving blockages: unmerge the offending package, in your case =xorg-x11-6.9 (`emerge -C =xorg-x11-6.9`). Since that's the only package blocking all those others, unmerging it will solve the whole mess. The Modular Xorg Migration Guide[1] may help you. HTH [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eth0 and eth1 unwanted autoconfiguration
quoth the Teresa and Dale: darren kirby wrote: Hello all, Does anyone know why my eth0 (wired) and eth1 (wireless) interfaces are getting started and autoconfigured at boot despite not being present at any runlevel in rc-update? They are getting configured with the settings in conf.d/net, whether or not eth0 has a cable plugged in, and whether or not the firmware is loaded for eth1 (it is a PCMCIA device). Obviously, these settings are bunk... I am not sure what info I should put here to diagnose this: gentoo-sources-2.6.14-r5 baselayout-1.12.0_pre16-r3 Again, net.eth0 and net.eth1 are not shown at _any_ runlevel when I run 'rc-update -s'. thanks, -d Is it possible that you are running something that needs net and that is starting it? I know some things, like ivman and such, will start other services if they must be running for them to work. I don't think so... The only network related script in the default runlevel is 'net.lo'. syslog-ng doesn't need network does it? Could this be from hotplug or udev? I really don't see why they would start?! Just a thought. Is strange though. Dale :D :D :D -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org ...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected... - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 pgpZeF3Ed1ajL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] eth0 and eth1 unwanted autoconfiguration *Resolved* I think...
quoth the Richard Fish: On 4/14/06, darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible that you are running something that needs net and that is starting it? I know some things, like ivman and such, will start other services if they must be running for them to work. I don't think so... The only network related script in the default runlevel is 'net.lo'. syslog-ng doesn't need network does it? Yes, it does. Really? Following Renat's advice I checked all my initscripts called from 'boot' or 'default'. Not a single one relies on net working. syslog-ng has a case statement that checks if you have tcp/udp logging in your syslog-ng.conf but this does not apply to my laptop (the machine in question). 1. Check your setting and the comments for RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING in /etc/conf.d/rc. This should probably be set to 'lo' for your system. Ok, it was 'no'. I changed to 'lo'. Rebooted and now only eth0 starts?! 2. Hotplug can also activate network interfaces. See /etc/hotplug/net.agent. I'm not sure how this affects cardbus adapters however... Ok, I added 8139too to /etc/hotplug/blacklist, rebooted and it seems to be behaving now. 3. For eth0, merge the ifplugd package and the interface will not be activated until a cable is plugged in. However you might need a 1.12 baselayout for this functionality... A welcome suggestion, but not really what I am after. I just don't want the interface starting automatically at boot. -Richard Thanks for the help everyone! Resolved for now... -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org ...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected... - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 pgpW3IqByBbOY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] eth0 and eth1 unwanted autoconfiguration *Resolved* I think...
On 4/14/06, darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it does. Really? Following Renat's advice I checked all my initscripts called from 'boot' or 'default'. Not a single one relies on net working. syslog-ng has a Oops, I didn't actually read the script, just saw the output from grep...sorry. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
On Friday 14 April 2006 02:36 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or three - I don't remember exactly) servers which I wasn't able to upload to. The important thing is that I think I got through the process correctly. If I missed something please tell me. Signature is fine (imported automatically here), and don't worry about the key servers, most of them sync with eachother ;-) Oh, that's really cool. However, while searching for Rumen's key, I didn't find it on most of the keyservers. Is this just because they only syncronise once a month or so, or is the key new, or were the keyservers just not syncing between the ones I tried first? pgpFdWqkxIEbi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages
On Friday 14 April 2006 01:45 pm, Teresa and Dale wrote: Ralph Slooten wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or three - I don't remember exactly) servers which I wasn't able to upload to. The important thing is that I think I got through the process correctly. If I missed something please tell me. Signature is fine (imported automatically here), and don't worry about the key servers, most of them sync with eachother ;-) I tried to set mine up but couldn't get anywhere with it. Then I moved and changed email addresses anyway so I have no clue where to start. Well, I use KMail, which is nice. I first installed KGPG, which works to encrypt and sign messages and files. Create a key there. Then KMail pretty much works next to KGPG really well. Upload your key a few keyservers via right clicking on the KGPG icon in the system tray. This is assuming you use KDE, though. I don't know how to do it in Gnome. All that said, where is that guide you were using?? I need one if I am going to set this up for mine too. As far as the reference I used, it was for how to organise a keysigning party. It still has a great deal of relevant information though. http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html I also found http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html#ss5.1 very useful. I didn't read it all the way through, so I don't know how much more info it has that I don't know about. Enjoy! Thanks No problem. I just hope they can start integrating this stuff into GMail, so that when I'm not using my laptop and rather using GMail's excellent web interface I can enjoy the same key signing as I do here. The really cool thing about all this is that when I used Windows and (GASP) Outlook (not for long - I couldn't stand its overpowering bloatedness) the only way to sign or encrypt was with a key issued from some massive corporation or the Post Office. $15. I didn't need it that bad, so I didn't get it. Here, with the GPG stuff, it's free! This is so cool... If I'm ever able I'll try hosting a keyserver too, though that'll happen only when I have the raw bandwidth to do so : ( pgpI4Bh2zcPPs.pgp Description: PGP signature
