Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ a lot of good replies ]
I am really disgusted.
Very well said!
Alexander Skwar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 03. Apr 2007, 21:17:39 -0700 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why do --nocolor and --color=n not work (sys-apps/portage-2.1.2.3)?
Why does the damned thing default to thinking I want blaring bizarre
colors scattered all over my screen?
I did not read the whole thread. So this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:40:21PM +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
try to unset the FETCHCOMMAND in your /etc/make.conf
That does eliminate the color output,
So your rant was without substance, after all?
to disable getdelta. If the portage
Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not default to a _useful_ condition?
But, it does! The colors are very useful!
Alexander Skwar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that people are fine, it is groups of people who cause
the problems in the world.
This is a interesting observation that I concur with in general -
unfortunately you own attitude displayed in your previous messages
pretty much provides a counter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my current favorite. emerge -f digikam. It downloads a
corrupted file
No, it doesn't.
Emerging (6 of 6) media-gfx/digikam-0.9.1 to /
Adjusting permissions recursively: '/Gentoo/Portage/distfiles/'
Downloading
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:27:48PM +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
Would you please show a little respect to the people who developed
the software you use every day.
I have found that people are fine, it is groups of people who cause
the problems in
Hello Rumen Yotov,
This happens with all binary-source ;) packages, like java,
firefox-bin, openoffice-bin etc.
They have been made to work on quite all systems (despite existing
libraries).
Use CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/dir/path in /etc/make.conf to work around.
You mask out binary packages
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 18:08
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why are gentoo people so in love
withcolorizedoutput?!?
Insults rarely get you anywhere. Constructive feedback and
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Francesco Talamona wrote:
echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge -av heliodor
Do the following, instead :)
echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' /etc/portage/package.keywords
The ~amd64 is redundant in package.keywords if ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:12:38 +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Thanks for the answers, but to be honest, I still do not get, what the
problem is and how to solve it. Could someone explain me, what goes
wrong, if I use a binary package like sun-jdk?
The problem is that revdep-rebuild checks the
On Thursday 05 April 2007, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Thanks for the answers, but to be honest, I still do not get, what
the problem is and how to solve it. Could someone explain me, what
goes wrong, if I use a binary package like sun-jdk?
The problem is that you can't recompile sun-jdk.
Say you
Thanks for the answers, but to be honest, I still do not get, what the
problem is and how to solve it. Could someone explain me, what goes
wrong, if I use a binary package like sun-jdk?
Thanks
Marc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I have installed the berkano overlay and now have avidemux installed and
appearing to work.
of course as an svn ebuild, tomorrow's version may not work at all.
On Thu, April 5, 2007 1:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
w avidemux svn, I'll try that tonight and see what happens.
In fact I could log
2007/4/4, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chuanwen Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Or if I use eth3,what do I need to do to fix it?
Cause after I changed eth0 to eth3 in cond.d/net and added eth3 to
rc-update,when I boot up my machine,new error occur:
Bringing up eth3
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 15:57:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am told the ~ platform is testing. No it is not, or should not
be; it is one thing to release new features which may or may not be
finished, but entirely different to release untested code.
~ARCH is testing, don't run it if you
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Ryan Sims wrote:
On 4/4/07, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:57:01 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge -av heliodor
Do the following, instead :)
echo
Hi Neil,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:52:12 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Rumen Yotov,
This happens with all binary-source ;) packages, like java,
firefox-bin, openoffice-bin etc.
They have been made to work on quite all systems (despite existing
libraries).
Use
On 2007-04-05, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not default to a _useful_ condition?
But, it does! The colors are very useful!
Only on certain terminals. They're quite unreadable on a white
background (which has always been the default for
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:24:02 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
But, it does! The colors are very useful!
Only on certain terminals. They're quite unreadable on a white
background (which has always been the default for xterm and
it's descendants, right?).
Those particular colours are
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Hello Daniel Iliev,
Actually I'd be glad to read some results from a Fake RAID-0 vs LVM
tests. My bet would be that RAID-0 w/o LVM would give the best speeds
Omitting LVM isn't an option, I'd lose all the flexibility that LVM
offers. I don't see why RAID-0
On Thursday 05 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user]
Why are gentoo people so in love with colorized output?!?':
31334
I think you meant 31337.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984
Plenty of noise over this one, with zero useful accomplishments.
My suggestions:
1) Stop replying to the emails
2) Felix: File a bug, you are wasting your time ranting here
2a) If you don't want to file a bug, then kindly drop it
3) Be respectful and courteous to each other
That is all.
On 2007-04-05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:24:02 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
But, it does! The colors are very useful!
Only on certain terminals. They're quite unreadable on a white
background (which has always been the default for xterm and
it's
On 2007-04-05, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-05, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not default to a _useful_ condition?
But, it does! The colors are very useful!
Only on certain terminals. They're quite unreadable on a
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 02:45:15PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
My point was why default to something that isn't useful for the
standard terminal emulators like xterm, aterm, rxvt, etc. Are
there common terminal emulators that default to a black
background?
aterm on default settings has a
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:39:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Out of curiosity I made some tests which confirmed my expectations. What
about you - did you have time (and wish) to take some performance
benchmarks? I would be glad to see some additional results.
So your tests show that RAID-0 is
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:15 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Those particular colours are less useful, because they are designed
for a black background,
But the default background on terminals under X has always been
white (at least as long as I remember). Are there really a lot
of
On 4/5/07, fire-eyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plenty of noise over this one, with zero useful accomplishments.
My suggestions:
1) Stop replying to the emails
2) Felix: File a bug, you are wasting your time ranting here
2a) If you don't want to file a bug, then kindly drop it
3) Be
On 4/4/07, Mike Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first try was a udev rule like: (each on one line.)
BUS==usb SYMLINK=mouse_1 SYSFS{manufacturer}==Logitech
PHYSDEVPATH==*:00:02.0/usb2/2-9 OPTIONS+=last_rule
BUS==usb SYMLINK=mouse_2 SYSFS{manufacturer}==Logitech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Edwards said the following on 2007-04-05 16:45:
| ...
| My point was why default to something that isn't useful for the
| standard terminal emulators like xterm, aterm, rxvt, etc. Are
| there common terminal emulators that default to a black
|
Alan McKinnon wrote:
You *could* get around the problem with a complex arrangment of
symlinks, but then you'd have to maintain them. It's so much easier to
just tell revdep-rebuild to ignore the binary package altogether, using
Rumen and Neil's suggestions
So shouldn't /opt be in
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:39:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Out of curiosity I made some tests which confirmed my expectations. What
about you - did you have time (and wish) to take some performance
benchmarks? I would be glad to see some additional results.
So
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Why are gentoo people so in love with colorized
output?!?':
31334
I think you meant 31337.
I thought he was estimating how many posters took his bait.
--
»Q«
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:34:19 -0500, Roy Wright wrote:
So shouldn't /opt be in SEARCH_DIRS_MASK by default as that is where
binary packages are suppose to be installed?
Most binary packages now install a file into /etc/revdep-rebuild setting
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK for that package, rather than
Daniel Iliev wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:39:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Out of curiosity I made some tests which confirmed my expectations. What
about you - did you have time (and wish) to take some performance
benchmarks? I would be glad to see some
On 2007-04-05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:15 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Those particular colours are less useful, because they are designed
for a black background,
But the default background on terminals under X has always been
white (at
On 2007-04-05, Tony Stohne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards said the following on 2007-04-05 16:45:
| ...
| My point was why default to something that isn't useful for the
| standard terminal emulators like xterm, aterm, rxvt, etc. Are
| there common terminal emulators that default to a
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 07:22, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 08:19:47 Graham Murray wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all I believe most people (including myself) very much prefer
colors over no colors (no I cannot qualify with any
Hello Grant Edwards,
Until recently, it was all Gentoo users, since the installation was
done from a virtual console.
Nah. I almost always do 90% of the install from an aterm (with
a white bacground).
Only if you're installing via SSH, otherwise 90% of the install was done
before you
On Thursday 05 April 2007, Grant Edwards wrote:
I used rxvt for many years until cut/paste stopped working for
me a couple years back.
Me too!!
I was in love with rxvt... So I switched to (urxvt)
x11-terms/rxvt-unicode, it is basically the same but fully functional.
Ciao
Francesco
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Edwards said the following on 2007-04-05 19:51:
| Grant Edwards said the following on 2007-04-05 16:45:
| | ...
| That will change the colors that are used by 'ls' without
| breaking other programs that use color?
|
The colors of any other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Stohne said the following on 2007-04-05 20:26:
...
| I think there is a third alternative to rgb.txt and ~/.Xdefaults.
| bash DIRCOLORS is an option and it will affect ls.
|
For clarification - dircolors ar not dependent of bash.
It is supported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Talamona said the following on 2007-04-05 20:33:
|
| Me too!!
| I was in love with rxvt... So I switched to (urxvt)
| x11-terms/rxvt-unicode, it is basically the same but fully functional.
|
Yes, urxvt is my choice too :) Amen to that!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick said the following on 2007-04-05 19:07:
| ...
| Hmm, neither less not cat give me color output. Passing --color=y to
either
| tells me things like:
| ==
| There is no color=y option (less --help for help)
|
Dale wrote:
Nelson, David J wrote:
Try emailing your bank? It may be that their website uses some sort
of Windows script via MSIE (which I am led to believe allows sites to
do stuff with your local machine, I know at work if I open the
intranet in MSIE it knows who I am from my NT logon, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Stohne said the following on 2007-04-05 21:07:
| ...
| To make less interpret color escape sequences, you need the -R option.
| export LESS=-R in your shell startup script and you-ll have it as
| default.
or simply put alias less=less -R,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
When the first
colors were added to emerge, did no one think hard coded magic
constants were wrong?
I'm not that big developer (I just hack some python here and there, and
I'm trying to learn c++), but I agree, hard coded magic constants are
99.999% of times
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Stohne said the following on 2007-04-05 21:14:
| ...
| or simply put alias less=less -R, without the quotes, in your
| ~/.bashrc or in the systemwide bashrc in /etc.
|
Ooops - sorry for the redundant info. I'm a bit tired...
//T
-BEGIN PGP
On 2007-04-05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Grant Edwards,
Until recently, it was all Gentoo users, since the installation was
done from a virtual console.
Nah. I almost always do 90% of the install from an aterm (with
a white bacground).
Only if you're installing
I've been rumaging around on the internet for the last few hours, but I'm
still confused ( a regular condition!)
Here's my problem. I have a video camera (ken-a-vision, 7000 series) which I
can attached to my microscope which outputs a standard analog signal. I want
to capture this signal on
Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
Hello Grant Edwards,
Until recently, it was all Gentoo users, since the installation was
done from a virtual console.
Nah. I almost always do 90% of the install from an aterm (with
a white bacground).
Only if you're installing via SSH, otherwise 90% of the
[This is a followup to the whole thread, not any particular posting]
Something interesting just happened to me that I would like to share.
I realized that I have a program called usetool that I must have
installed some time. What is that i thought, so my first try to find
out was to try 'man
On 05 April 2007, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
I've been rumaging around on the internet for the last few hours, but I'm
still confused ( a regular condition!)
Here's my problem. I have a video camera (ken-a-vision, 7000 series) which
I can attached to my microscope which outputs a standard analog
On Thursday 05 April 2007 16:37, Uwe Thiem wrote:
On 05 April 2007, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
I've been rumaging around on the internet for the last few hours, but I'm
still confused ( a regular condition!)
Here's my problem. I have a video camera (ken-a-vision, 7000 series)
which I can
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:52:28 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Only if you're installing via SSH,
Which is how I do all my installs.
Even the first?
A VC is always available, an xterm is usually available, so it makes
sense to base defaults on a VC.
I would pick a default that
On 2007-04-05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:52:28 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Only if you're installing via SSH,
Which is how I do all my installs.
Even the first?
Yup.
A VC is always available, an xterm is usually available, so it makes
sense
Cannot switch to any tty[1-6] from gdm (vt7) using control-alt-f[1-6]
respectively.
If I login (gnome session), then the above key combination works.
But from the gdm/xdm screen (before login) it does nothing.
Where should I start to look for the reason?
gnome-base/gdm-2.16.4
x11-apps/xdm-1.0.5
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:41:12 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Thay's why using colors by default can be a problem.
Except you edit make.conf before you emerge anything and guess where you
turn off the colours :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 20: Synthetic natural gas
signature.asc
on 04/06/2007 12:56 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
Cannot switch to any tty[1-6] from gdm (vt7) using control-alt-f[1-6]
respectively.
If I login (gnome session), then the above key combination works.
But from the gdm/xdm screen (before login) it does nothing.
Where should I start to look
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You mask out binary packages with SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=
in /etc/revdep-rebuild/99revdep-rebuild. CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK has an
entirely different use.
For the record, worked for me, with:
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.13
Thanks, Neil
Bogo
--
Sent
Well, I changed my rule per your advice:
BUS==usb, SYMLINK+=mouse1, SYSFS{manufacturer}==Logitech,
OPTIONS+=last_rule, PHYSDEVPATH==*:00:02.0/usb2/2-10
And it STILL doesn't work. I've googled and read everything I can find. It
looks like my PHYSDEVPATH isn't correct. I've got one rule for
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:46:45PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote
OPTIONS+=last_rule, PHYSDEVPATH==*:00:02.0/usb2/2-10
Any ideas are much appreciated.
Are you sure both PHYSDEVPATHs contain 00:02.0?
Anyhow, let's dig into this a bit deeper...
- go into text console mode (e.g. tty1)
-
Here is the output of those command:
mouse1:
19a20,22
usbdev2.56_ep81
usbdev2.56_ep00
usbdev2.56
645a649
mouse0
664a669
his_mouse
671a677
event2
19a20,22
usbdev2.57_ep81
usbdev2.57_ep00
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 18:07 +0100, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 07:22, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 08:19:47 Graham Murray wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all I believe most people (including myself) very much prefer
...
65 matches
Mail list logo
