On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:59:30 +, Thufir wrote:
I decided to try ufed per http://gentoo-wiki.com/FAQ_USE_Flags,
however was mystified that neither /etc/portage/package.use nor
/etc/portage/package.keywords were changed.
Shouldn't changes be made to files in /etc/portagae, preferably?
Hello.
Have you tried using it? Please post here your php error message.
I believe it should work without any configuration.
В сообщении от Monday 23 July 2007 06:37:58 Mike Diehl написал(а):
Hi all,
I'm needing to update php to include both the gd and mysql extensions.
I believe I have
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:37:58 -0600 Mike Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm needing to update php to include both the gd and mysql extensions.
I believe I have both packages installed.
I emerged php with both extensions in my USE flag.
[...]
Looks alright.
How do I get these to be
On 7/22/07, Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:27:09 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
echo dev-java/blackdown-jre nsplugin
/etc/make.profile/package.use.mask echo dev-java/blackdown-jdk
nsplugin
Kenneth Prugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I wasn't exactly positive if it did pull everything in, and
specifying specifically can't really hurt at all as long as you know
it's supported with your cpu.
Doesn't the doc say, that it actually CAN hurt, as it forces the use
of certain
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
At Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:57:09 -0400 Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/22/07, Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you. I was fooled by man portage, but I should have know
better. That is, I knew full well, but forgot, that /usr/profile is
temporary and that user changes
On Monday 23 July 2007, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I was asking if some words should be at the very top of the man page
stating that /etc/make.profile is the place for user changes.
It seems like you grasp it all, but just in case, here's the executive
summary:
make.profile is for devs to make
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:43:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
make.profile is for devs to make default system changes
make.conf is for users to make customised system changes
/etc/portage/* is for users to make customized local changes
In increasing order of priority.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
That was the past, -Os generally
Which will destroy your flash device in as little as
a couple of months
(voice of experience here), and it probably the
reason the option was
removed.
Ulp! Here's my line from fstab:
/dev/sdb1 /usbauto
noauto,user,rw,exec,sync0 0
Copied from a forum
At Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:02:35 +0100 Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:43:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
make.profile is for devs to make default system changes
make.conf is for users to make customised system changes
/etc/portage/* is for users to make customized
On Monday 23 July 2007, maxim wexler wrote:
Which will destroy your flash device in as little as
a couple of months
(voice of experience here), and it probably the
reason the option was
removed.
Ulp! Here's my line from fstab:
/dev/sdb1 /usbauto
noauto,user,rw,exec,sync
Kenneth Prugh wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
That was the
Hello,
I know that baselayout can handle certain services, but how do I combine
that with the need for
various host files, resolve.conf files, gateway, hostname, domainname,
ESSID, etc. Even default printers would be nice.
I need to support choosing one of several configurations at boot
Mike Edenfield wrote:
More importantly, -O2 seems to be the typical optimization
setting, and almost all free software packages are built and
tested and generally supported, for whatever that means in an
open-source world, under -O2. If you report a bug in a package
and you use -Os, the first
Hi,
Have you actually measured the gain? Emerge some thing with Os, qsize the
package, emerge it with O2, qsize again? I went back to O2 from Os when it
became apparent that the resulting binaries were actually _larger_. On every
single package I tried.
Zsitvai János
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-07-23, Zsitvai János [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you actually measured the gain? Emerge some thing with
Os, qsize the package, emerge it with O2, qsize again? I went
back to O2 from Os when it became apparent that the resulting
binaries were actually _larger_. On every single
Hello Alan McKinnon,
It's only a matter of time and relates to how flash devices work. After
many many writes to the same storage cell, it degrades. The good ones
are rated to about 100,000 writes per cell. The cheap and nasty ones
can be as low as 10,000 writes. You would be amazed how
Hello,
I have several new portables to install.
On an HP9000z I reformatted the hard drive
and used liveCD 2007.0. I performed the most basic
installation (no X, KDE )
The installation ran to completion. The installation
process declared itself successful.
Upon reboot I get this error
James wrote:
Hello,
I have several new portables to install.
On an HP9000z I reformatted the hard drive
and used liveCD 2007.0. I performed the most basic
installation (no X, KDE )
The installation ran to completion. The installation
process declared itself successful.
Upon reboot I get
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:04:53 + (UTC), James wrote:
Upon reboot I get this error message:
Block Device /dev/sda4 is not a valid root device...
The root block device is unspecified or not detected.
Please specify a device to boot, or shell for a shell...
You probably haven't compiled
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:15:42 -0500, Jeff wrote:
I know that baselayout can handle certain services, but how do I
combine that with the need for
various host files, resolve.conf files, gateway, hostname, domainname,
ESSID, etc. Even default printers would be nice.
I need to support
--- James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have several new portables to install.
On an HP9000z I reformatted the hard drive
and used liveCD 2007.0. I performed the most basic
installation (no X, KDE )
The installation ran to completion. The installation
process declared itself
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Although I agree with your reasoning above, you are contradicting
yourself in the following two statements:
At least, it's no more broken under -Os than under -O2.
[...] benefits of using -Os over -O2 are minimal
compared against the possible problems it might
James wrote:
Joshua Doll Joshua.Doll at gmail.com writes:
What's the drive mappings look like in the bios, I've had issues with
sata (I assume) in the past and funky drive mappings because of the
bios.
The bios is minimalistic. Boot order is about all it will let me change.
Right
On Monday 23 July 2007 22:04:53 James wrote:
Any suggestions?
Add doscsi to the kernel command line in grub.
--
Mike Williams
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:44:51 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
This same problem has been handled on gentoo-user bout
a billion times.
And how does that comment help the OP? Without a link to the list
archives, all it tells him is that he is not the first to experience this.
Incidentally,
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that
On Monday 23 July 2007 03:04:05 am Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:37:58 -0600 Mike Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I get these to be recognized by php applications?
They should be configured in /etc/php/php*/php.ini if you want to load
them automatically
Mike Diehl wrote:
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 23 17:59 apache2-php5
There you have it ;-)
Look inside...
Regards
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Monday 23 July 2007 06:32:53 pm Norberto Bensa wrote:
Mike Diehl wrote:
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 23 17:59 apache2-php5
There you have it ;-)
Look inside...
Regards
Well, I'm getting closer, then.
I looked inside the php.ini file in the apache2-php5 directory. It has an
Mike Diehl wrote:
So, how do I install the php mysql extension?
Thanx again,
You don't. Just emerge php with mysql, and whatever USE flags you want.
Best regards,
Norberto
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Mike Williams mike at gaima.co.uk writes:
Any suggestions?
Add doscsi to the kernel command line in grub.
The 2007.0 liveCD did this as a default option.
I'm going back to a traditional (handbook) installation..
James
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
And how does that comment help the OP? Without a link to the list
archives, all it tells him is that he is not the first to experience this.
Well if the solution is so trivial, I wonder why the devs don't
put the fix into the installation liveCD?
On Monday 23 July 2007 07:05:21 pm Norberto Bensa wrote:
Mike Diehl wrote:
So, how do I install the php mysql extension?
Thanx again,
You don't. Just emerge php with mysql, and whatever USE flags you want.
Best regards,
Norberto
Well, I got rid of php with:
emerge -C php
Then I
Mike Diehl wrote:
But I still don't
have mysql or gd support.
How do you know you didn't got mysql/gd? What does:
?php
phpinfo();
?
say? Does it show mysql/gd?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
38 matches
Mail list logo
