On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:52:44 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
Going through my kernel config I see CONFIG_M686 Pentium Pro. That
can't be right.
But there is nothing for Intel Atom, the 900A's processor. Is it
CONFIG_M586? Is CONFIG_M386 my best choice, the default?
AFAIK, CONFIG_MCORE2
090520 dhk wrote:
Ever since I upgraded firefox to version 3 it crashes when certain pages
are opened. Currently I have version 3.0.10 and amd64. I've been hoping
the problem would get fixed, but it hasn't been yet. For example
I can not even go to ebay ( http://www.ebay.com ), the page
On Thursday 21 May 2009 10:30:17 Jarry wrote:
Hi,
I tried to emerge spamassassin, but emerge failed while working
on re2c. I keep getting this error for about 3 days, despite
of syncing/cleaning/rebuilding portage tree. What could be reason
for this problem?
Log says something about c++
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 10:30:17 Jarry wrote:
I tried to emerge spamassassin, but emerge failed while working
on re2c. I keep getting this error for about 3 days, despite
of syncing/cleaning/rebuilding portage tree. What could be reason
for this problem?
Log says
On 5/21/09, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
configure:2460: checking for C++ compiler default output file name
configure:2487: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -march=athlon64 - O2 -pipe
-Wl,-O1 conftest.cpp 5
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++: O2: No such file or directory
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++: -E or -x
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, dhk dhk...@optonline.net wrote:
Ever since I upgraded firefox to version 3 it crashes when certain pages are
opened. Currently I have version 3.0.10 and amd64. I've been hoping the
problem would get fixed, but it hasn't been yet. For
On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:21:22 Jarry wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 10:30:17 Jarry wrote:
I tried to emerge spamassassin, but emerge failed while working
on re2c. I keep getting this error for about 3 days, despite
of syncing/cleaning/rebuilding portage tree. What
Hi list!
I'm wondering how to interpret the custom-optimization use flag which
has become much more common in the recent weeks/months.
I mean, I understand the basic concept: it either uses the cflags from
my make.conf or its own set. But what exactly does the dev want to tell
me when she uses
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:30 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Hi list!
I'm wondering how to interpret the custom-optimization use flag which
has become much more common in the recent weeks/months.
I mean, I understand the basic concept: it either uses the cflags from
my make.conf or its own
dhk wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, dhk dhk...@optonline.net wrote:
Ever since I upgraded firefox to version 3 it crashes when certain
pages are
opened. Currently I have version 3.0.10 and amd64. I've been
hoping the
problem would get fixed, but it hasn't been
Hi,
I have to apply complicated patches to an embedded linux kernel and
application source tree.
The diffs contain a colored mixture of things which need to be
applied, nice-to-have stuff and real no-nos.
I looking for a interactive graphical to tool to apply different
patches out of a patchset
Alan McKinnon wrote:
configure:2487: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -march=athlon64 - O2 -pipe
^
ka-ching!
Arttu V. wrote:
CXXFLAGS='-march=athlon64 - O2 -pipe'
Nah, let's make a better guess: most unfortunate typo in
/etc/make.conf?
Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 22:57:05 schrieb maxim wexler:
Now that I'm starting to use paludis in place of portage
Congratulations :-)
Sure enough, under /var/db/pkg/.cache, appear the following:
all_CONFIG_PROTECT
all_CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK
But how did paludis decide to use these variables?
meino.cramer at gmx.de writes:
I have to apply complicated patches to an embedded linux kernel and
application source tree.
You might want to post to gentoo-embedded for more focused attention
to details on all things related to embedded gentoo.
ymmv,
James
Hello,
One of my gentoo users only uses and external mouse
and hates the synaptics pad.
I cannot get rid of the input being active from the
synaptics pad.
make.conf has this entry:
INPUT_DEVICES=keyboard mouse evdev
VIDEO_CARDS=fbdev fglrx vesa
In xorg.conf I have it explicitly disabled:
Hi group,
When my netbook boots I get:
...
apcid: cannot open input layer [ok]
*cpufreqd requires kernel config CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
...
but a grep of the kernel config reveals: CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
Is there something else I'm missing?
Maxim
But there is nothing for Intel Atom, the 900A's
processor. Is it
CONFIG_M586? Is CONFIG_M386 my best choice, the
default?
AFAIK, CONFIG_MCORE2 is the correct choice.
BTW /etc/paludis/bashrc lists:
CFLAGS=-02 -march=i686 -pipe. Is that supposed to
reflect the proper
kernel
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
One of my gentoo users only uses and external mouse
and hates the synaptics pad.
I cannot get rid of the input being active from the
synaptics pad.
I think you need to set corepointer=0 in the FDI file or
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:52:44 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
Going through my kernel config I see CONFIG_M686 Pentium Pro. That
can't be right.
But there is nothing for Intel Atom, the 900A's processor. Is it
The more generic choices you have will work, but be
slightly less
optimised.
Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a
version of GCC
that supports it.
$gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo-4.3.2-r3 p1.6, pie-10.1.5) 4.3.2
googled gcc 4.3.2 + -march=auto; got nothing. Does that mean
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:59 AM, maxim wexler bliss...@yahoo.com wrote:
The more generic choices you have will work, but be
slightly less
optimised.
Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a
version of GCC
that supports it.
$gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo-4.3.2-r3 p1.6,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:59 PM, maxim wexler bliss...@yahoo.com wrote:
The more generic choices you have will work, but be
slightly less
optimised.
Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a
version of GCC
that supports it.
$gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo-4.3.2-r3 p1.6,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it should be -march=native
You're right! I'm sorry.
Paul Hartman writes:
Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a version of GCC
that supports it.
BTW, is there a possibility to let gcc tell what flags it will actually use
with -march=auto?
Oh, and is your gcc man page empty, too? 'info gcc' works, though. But I did
not find what
On Thu, 21 May 2009 18:00:38 + (UTC)
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
Any ideas how to disable the synaptics pad?
Have you looked in the Bios?
Somewhere around there should be an option to turn the touchpad
completely off
--
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Uwe
\ / against
Hi everyone!
I've been recently trying to make firefox and thunderbird work well
together, i.e
1. make mailto links from firefox launch thunderbird
2. make url from thunderbird open in firefox
After following a well spread trick, (described here
I just wrote:
Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a version of GCC
that supports it.
Oh, it's -march=native.
BTW, is there a possibility to let gcc tell what flags it will actually
use with -march=auto?
Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I
Laurent lejeune pisze:
Hi everyone!
I've been recently trying to make firefox and thunderbird work well
together, i.e
1. make mailto links from firefox launch thunderbird
2. make url from thunderbird open in firefox
After reading
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was
looking for in the [OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?
thread: http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/gcccpuopt
But it suggests using
james wirel...@tampabay.rr.com [09-05-21 19:20]:
meino.cramer at gmx.de writes:
I have to apply complicated patches to an embedded linux kernel and
application source tree.
You might want to post to gentoo-embedded for more focused attention
to details on all things related to
Joachim wrote:
Laurent lejeune pisze:
Hi everyone!
I've been recently trying to make firefox and thunderbird work well
together, i.e
1. make mailto links from firefox launch thunderbird
2. make url from thunderbird open in firefox
After reading
Laurent lejeune wrote:
i've checked that those entries are set to my firefox path
(/usr/bin/firefox). The thing is , once again, that thunderbird does
it's job of launching firefox, but the page that opens is a *downloaded
*version such as
file:///tmp/blabla.html
where i would like it to
Hello!
Just getting settled with Gentoo, happy so far.
I was a little confused to learn of the existence of the g-cpan module, even
at the presence of perl modules in Portage itself. g-cpan is supposed to be
a Portage wrapper for plain cpan? If I use g-cpan to install a module, will
it use the
Thanks, creating a new profile did it!
pretty frustrating that we don't know what specific option did the mess up.
Maybe what caused this is that the profile was the same i used with icedove
(debian port of thunderbird)
bye.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de
Albert Hopkins schrieb:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:30 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Hi list!
I'm wondering how to interpret the custom-optimization use flag which
has become much more common in the recent weeks/months.
I mean, I understand the basic concept: it either uses the cflags from
my
On Thursday 21 May 2009 20:30:19 Alex Schuster wrote:
Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was
looking for in the [OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?
thread: http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/gcccpuopt
It's the same thread as your own message is in.
On Tuesday 19 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Edit the world file and remove every version number in that file if
present. You don;t need it and portage is infinitely better at tracking it
than you are. Then remove everything with a category ending in lib, these
rarely need to be in world.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Edit the world file and remove every version number in that file if
present. You don;t need it and portage is infinitely better at tracking it
than you are. Then remove
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 20:30:19 Alex Schuster wrote:
Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was
looking for in the [OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?
thread: http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/gcccpuopt
It's the same
Hi. I used to think it was safe to use ~arch packages (through
package.keywords) on a stable system until I saw bug #257047 - GCC 4.3
didn't have a strict enough glibc dependency. And comment #15 in that
bug report is:
[...] we don't test or support half-stable half-testing
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict,
but portageq does not see it.
Background:
I've been masking out the new xorg server, but things have started to
break, so I'm giving in.
The process has been shaky, and I'm currently running something
different from what
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict,
but portageq does not see it.
Background:
I've been masking out the new xorg server, but things have started to
break, so I'm giving in.
The process has been shaky, and I'm
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict,
but portageq does not see it.
Probably because the ati-drivers you already have installed do not have this
file, either because they are an
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Alex Schuster wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict,
but portageq does not see it.
Probably because the ati-drivers you already have installed do not
On 21 May 2009, at 22:23, Tim Jones wrote:
...
I was a little confused to learn of the existence of the g-cpan
module, even at the presence of perl modules in Portage itself.
I don't know how other distros handle this. I'd imagine that most
package managers allow the installation of some
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict,
but portageq does not see it.
Probably because the ati-drivers you
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file
James wrote:
Hello,
One of my gentoo users only uses and external mouse
and hates the synaptics pad.
I cannot get rid of the input being active from the
synaptics pad.
make.conf has this entry:
INPUT_DEVICES=keyboard mouse evdev
VIDEO_CARDS=fbdev fglrx vesa
In xorg.conf I have it
48 matches
Mail list logo
