Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 06:43:14 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: Hi everybody, Is it me missing out on something or does KDE4 (namely PyKDE4) is borked when default python is set to 3.1? # eselect python list Available Python interpreters: [1] python2.7 [2] python3.1 * # eselect python list --python3 Available Python 3 interpreters: [1] python3.1 * # eselect python list --python2 Available Python 2 interpreters: [1] python2.7 * # grep python /etc/make.conf pygrub python python3 pulseaudio qalculate qt3 qt3support with all of the above PyKDE4 compiles, however kde-base/system-config-printer-kde-4.6.3 barfs: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/apps/cmake/modules/FindPyKDE4.py, line 8, in module import PyKDE4.pykdeconfig with a bit of look-around it seems like pykde4 has: RESTRICT_PYTHON_ABIS=2.4 which boils down to (what seems like) pykde4 is built only for 3.1 # epm -ql pykde4 | grep pykdeconfig /usr/lib64/python3.1/site-packages/PyKDE4/pykdeconfig.py should I be performing some other waving in the air to make this whole thing fly? It seems like a bug to me, but I'd rather confirm I'm not missing something before reporting it. The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and instead stay with the latest 2 version ... Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work with 3.1? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems
on 06/14/2011 08:38 AM john wrote the following: snip Will try studying all options in kernel to see if I can cure this. There are roccat options but these are for macros and don't help. But there maybe more other subtle ones available. Regards Thanks for your help Have you enabled roccat support in 2.6.39 ? grep -i roccat .config # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_ARVO is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONE is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONEPLUS is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KOVAPLUS is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_PYRA is not set
Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems
Have only tried CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT but this did not help. Will give the others a go. Not quite sure why older kernels would recognise keyboard but .39 kernel does not and .38 I have issues with when plugging in usb stick. Are the kernel guys trying to make the hardware support more specific? Or should any keyboard be recognised? Fascinating --Original Message-- From: Thanasis To: Gentoo Cc: john ReplyTo: Gentoo Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems Sent: 14 Jun 2011 07:59 on 06/14/2011 08:38 AM john wrote the following: snip Will try studying all options in kernel to see if I can cure this. There are roccat options but these are for macros and don't help. But there maybe more other subtle ones available. Regards Thanks for your help Have you enabled roccat support in 2.6.39 ? grep -i roccat .config # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_ARVO is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONE is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONEPLUS is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KOVAPLUS is not set # CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_PYRA is not set JDM
Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:18:02AM +, JDM wrote: Have only tried CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT but this did not help. Will give the others a go. Not quite sure why older kernels would recognise keyboard but .39 kernel does not and .38 I have issues with when plugging in usb stick. Are the kernel guys trying to make the hardware support more specific? Or should any keyboard be recognised? Fascinating When I used 2.6.39-gentoo unmounting the partitions on my Seagate portable usb hdd took at least three to five full minutes, and a few times shutdown took so long I resorted to powering off before it completed. But since Sunday, when I upgraded to 2.6.39-gentoo-r1 the problem is gone. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
[gentoo-user] Internet
Hi, Yesterday I tried to make a connection between my three PC to manage my Epson printer: two with Win XP and Gentoo and one with Win7. I didn't succeed, but that's not important! After reboot of the three machines I went back to Win7: no problem and to my laptop with Xp and Gentoo: OK. But the problem is on my desktop with two HD, one with XP and the other with Gentoo amd64. None of them can connect to internet neither gentoo nor XP. I tryed many things (revdep-rebuild, verification in the box, etc.) but I was unsuccessful. Here is what I become at boot: * Bringing up interface lo * 127.0.0.1/8 ... [ ok ] * Adding routes * 127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 ... [ ok ] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[3076]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: waiting for carrier dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: carrier acquired dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20 dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[3076]: timed out dhcpcd[3076]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[3076]: timed out [ !! ] [ !! ] * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to start * Mounting USB device filesystem [usbfs] ... [ ok ] * Mounting misc binary format filesystem ... [ ok ] * Activating swap devices ... [ ok ] * Initializing random number generator ... [ ok ] rc boot logging stopped at Tue Jun 14 08:29:53 2011 rc default logging started at Tue Jun 14 08:29:53 2011 * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[3223]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[3223]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20 dhcpcd[3223]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[3223]: timed out dhcpcd[3223]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[3223]: timed out [ !! ] [ !! ] * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to start * ERROR: cannot start netmount as net.eth0 would not start And another try: /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start * Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[6723]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[6723]: timed out dhcpcd[6723]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: probing for an IPv4LL address dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: checking for 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: using IPv4LL address 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: forked to background, child pid 6744 [ ok ] * received address 169.254.79.43/16 Could please anybody tell me how to solve this awkward problem? Thank you very much Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
* Cahn Roger rc...@club-internet.fr [110614 09:05]: Hi, [..] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[3076]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: waiting for carrier dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: carrier acquired dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20 dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[3076]: timed out dhcpcd[3076]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[3076]: timed out [..] Hi Roger, It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses. If it's your Internet router you might try resetting it (power cycling it.) I've seen them get wedged specifically relating to DHCP with many different consumer brands. Regards, Todd
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 15:32:22 Cahn Roger wrote: Hi, snipped But the problem is on my desktop with two HD, one with XP and the other with Gentoo amd64. None of them can connect to internet neither gentoo nor XP. I tryed many things (revdep-rebuild, verification in the box, etc.) but I was unsuccessful. Here is what I become at boot: snipped logs And another try: /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start * Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[6723]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[6723]: timed out dhcpcd[6723]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: probing for an IPv4LL address dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: checking for 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: using IPv4LL address 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: forked to background, child pid 6744 [ ok ] * received address 169.254.79.43/16 Could please anybody tell me how to solve this awkward problem? Thank you very much Roger Hi Roger, The log you showed indicates that the PC is unable to reach the DHCP server. As the issue occurs with both Operating Systems on the same machine makes me think there is an issue with the network-connection. Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually correct? -- Joost
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 14:32:22 Cahn Roger wrote: Hi, Yesterday I tried to make a connection between my three PC to manage my Epson printer: two with Win XP and Gentoo and one with Win7. I didn't succeed, but that's not important! After reboot of the three machines I went back to Win7: no problem and to my laptop with Xp and Gentoo: OK. But the problem is on my desktop with two HD, one with XP and the other with Gentoo amd64. None of them can connect to internet neither gentoo nor XP. I tryed many things (revdep-rebuild, verification in the box, etc.) but I was unsuccessful. Here is what I become at boot: * Bringing up interface lo * 127.0.0.1/8 ... [ ok ] * Adding routes * 127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 ... [ ok ] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[3076]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: waiting for carrier dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: carrier acquired dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20 dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[3076]: timed out dhcpcd[3076]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[3076]: timed out [ !! ] [ !! ] * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to start * Mounting USB device filesystem [usbfs] ... [ ok ] * Mounting misc binary format filesystem ... [ ok ] * Activating swap devices ... [ ok ] * Initializing random number generator ... [ ok ] rc boot logging stopped at Tue Jun 14 08:29:53 2011 rc default logging started at Tue Jun 14 08:29:53 2011 * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[3223]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[3223]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20 dhcpcd[3223]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[3223]: timed out dhcpcd[3223]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[3223]: timed out [ !! ] [ !! ] * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to start * ERROR: cannot start netmount as net.eth0 would not start And another try: /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start * Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ] * Bringing up interface eth0 * dhcp ... * Running dhcpcd ... dhcpcd[6723]: version 5.2.12 starting dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease dhcpcd[6723]: timed out dhcpcd[6723]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: probing for an IPv4LL address dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: checking for 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: using IPv4LL address 169.254.79.43 dhcpcd[6723]: forked to background, child pid 6744 [ ok ] * received address 169.254.79.43/16 Could please anybody tell me how to solve this awkward problem? Thank you very much Roger What does the router log show? Can you please share: ifconfig eth0 /etc/conf.d/net -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Le 14/06/2011 15:15, Todd Goodman a écrit : Hi Todd, Thank you for your quick answer. It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses. Well, it serves adresses for W7, and on the laptop for XP and Gentoo. The box is configured with fixed adresses. If it's your Internet router you might try resetting it I'll try it! Thank you again Todd Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Hi Mick, What does the router log show? Euh, how can I get it??? Can you please share: ifconfig eth0 ifconfig eth0 eth0Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db inet adr:169.254.79.43 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Masque:255.255.0.0 adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:44db/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:20708 (20.2 KiB) Interruption:17 /etc/conf.d/net # This blank configuration will automatically use DHCP for any net.* # scripts in /etc/init.d. To create a more complete configuration, # please review /etc/conf.d/net.example and save your configuration # in /etc/conf.d/net (this file :]!). config_eth0=dhcp In the box I stopped the option fixed adresses, but the problem remains the same :-( Thanks for your answers Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually correct? The cable and connections are well. Thank you Joost Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/14/2011 05:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually correct? The cable and connections are well. NIC became faulty?
[gentoo-user] to USE loop-aes or not to USE loop-aes, that is the confusion
Hi, When the story begins I had installed util-linux-2.18-r1. Then emerge told me, that it wants to downgrade to util-linux-2.12, because I hade set USE=loop-aes for that. Util-linux-2.19.something was on the road too... After some inverstigation I thought USE=crypt had replced USE=loop-aes, I removed USE=loop-aes and emerged util-linux. I upgraded loop-aes to 3.6c Emerge decided to install util-linux-2.19.something. Now, I got this: emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy =sys-apps/util-linux-2.12r[crypt,loop-aes]. !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/util-linux-2.18-r1 (Change USE: +loop-aes) (dependency required by sys-fs/loop-aes-3.6c [installed]) (dependency required by @selected [set]) (dependency required by @world [argument]) I totally confused here. What is the difference of USE=loop-aes and USE=crypt? Why are the versions oscillate that way? HELP ! :) Thank you very much for any hint in advance!:) Best regards mcc
Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems
Indi wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:18:02AM +, JDM wrote: Have only tried CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT but this did not help. Will give the others a go. Not quite sure why older kernels would recognise keyboard but .39 kernel does not and .38 I have issues with when plugging in usb stick. Are the kernel guys trying to make the hardware support more specific? Or should any keyboard be recognised? Fascinating When I used 2.6.39-gentoo unmounting the partitions on my Seagate portable usb hdd took at least three to five full minutes, and a few times shutdown took so long I resorted to powering off before it completed. But since Sunday, when I upgraded to 2.6.39-gentoo-r1 the problem is gone. I updated to 2.6.39 and was getting random reboots and lock ups. I went back to 2.6.38 myself. I think I'll wait until a little later kernel before I upgrade. YMMV Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
* Cahn Roger rc...@club-internet.fr [110614 09:31]: Le 14/06/2011 15:15, Todd Goodman a écrit : Hi Todd, Hi Roger, Thank you for your quick answer. You're welcome (for what it's worth.) It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses. Well, it serves adresses for W7, and on the laptop for XP and Gentoo. The box is configured with fixed adresses. Your DHCP server serves addresses for other hardware OK? Just not on this box running either Gentoo or W7? When you say fixed addresses you mean the DHCP server gives out a fixed IP address based on the MAC address of the requestor? Can you check the DHCP logs on the DHCP server? If it's your Internet router you might try resetting it I'll try it! If that doesn't work, maybe a wireshark or tcpdump on your Gentoo box and force it to send another DHCP request. If you're using fixed IP addresses you might try manually configuring the Gentoo box with it's IP address and see if networking all works fine then? Regards, Todd Thank you again Todd Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] USB Problems
on 06/14/2011 06:50 PM Dale wrote the following: I updated to 2.6.39 and was getting random reboots and lock ups. I went back to 2.6.38 myself. I think I'll wait until a little later kernel before I upgrade. Try 2.6.39-r1 ?
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 15:42:52 Cahn Roger wrote: Hi Mick, What does the router log show? Euh, how can I get it??? It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate. Are your running some sort of an access control list on the router and have not included your MAC address? Can you please share: ifconfig eth0 ifconfig eth0 eth0Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db inet adr:169.254.79.43 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Masque:255.255.0.0 adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:44db/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:20708 (20.2 KiB) Interruption:17 The Rx bytes is zero - your router does not seem to respond. Does this also stay zero if you set up a static address and route on the PC and try to ping the router? /etc/conf.d/net # This blank configuration will automatically use DHCP for any net.* # scripts in /etc/init.d. To create a more complete configuration, # please review /etc/conf.d/net.example and save your configuration # in /etc/conf.d/net (this file :]!). config_eth0=dhcp In the box I stopped the option fixed adresses, but the problem remains the same :-( Try setting an address manually: ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) and then try to ping it: ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 If you can ping it and get a response then the problem is probably with the router. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] polish fonts xorg.conf
Hello When I execute: setxkbmap pl I can type polish fonts in xterm and other X programs. But when I generate xorg.conf file with Xorg -configure and add the following to it I cannot type the polish fonts (I copied it to /etc/x11/xorg.conf) Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayoutpl EndSection Xorg.0.log: [ 29007.715] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [ 29008.100] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Power Button (type: KEYBOARD) [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_rules evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_model evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_layout us Do you have any suggestions of what may be wrong. thanks for help
Re: [gentoo-user] xserver does not work after upgrade
Dnia 27-05-2011 o godz. 17:27 Sebastian Beßler napisał(a): Am 27.05.2011 17:09, schrieb fajfu...@wp.pl: I found that hal has been unmerged during an upgrade. I installed it again and launching it at startup. HAL was removed for a reason, it is not longer used by xserver. You have to use Udev for that now. Thanks for your help. There were 2 ways of solving that problem. 1. To use the most recent genkernel with default genkernel configuration - it has got proper drivers for my graphic interface enabled 2. To compile kernel drivers for my graphics interface as was stated after emerging xorg drivers (I didn't find it earlier - sorry) again, thanks for your help
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate. My router hasn't this! Are your running some sort of an access control list on the router and have not included your MAC address? The MAC adresses are included in the box. Try setting an address manually: ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) I put this in /etc/conf.d/net; is it right? and then try to ping it: ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 The answer: ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms pipe 3 Regards Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Your DHCP server serves addresses for other hardware OK? Yes. A PC with W7, my laptop with XP and Gentoo Both work fine. The problem is on my desktop with two HD: XP and Gentoo Both OS can't connect to Internet. When you say fixed addresses you mean the DHCP server gives out a fixed IP address based on the MAC address of the requestor? Yes. I put manually in the box (router) ip and mac adresses. Can you check the DHCP logs on the DHCP server? No! Regards Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Try setting an address manually: ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) I put this in /etc/conf.d/net; is it right? No. Run them from terminal as root. Then check.
Re: [gentoo-user] to USE loop-aes or not to USE loop-aes, that is the confusion
On 06/14/11 11:46, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: What is the difference of USE=loop-aes and USE=crypt? Why are the versions oscillate that way? HELP ! :) Thank you very much for any hint in advance!:) Maybe helpful: http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/06/loop-aes-should-it-be-treecleaned/
Re: [gentoo-user] to USE loop-aes or not to USE loop-aes, that is the confusion
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, When the story begins I had installed util-linux-2.18-r1. Then emerge told me, that it wants to downgrade to util-linux-2.12, because I hade set USE=loop-aes for that. Util-linux-2.19.something was on the road too... After some inverstigation I thought USE=crypt had replced USE=loop-aes, I removed USE=loop-aes and emerged util-linux. I upgraded loop-aes to 3.6c Emerge decided to install util-linux-2.19.something. Now, I got this: emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy =sys-apps/util-linux-2.12r[crypt,loop-aes]. !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/util-linux-2.18-r1 (Change USE: +loop-aes) (dependency required by sys-fs/loop-aes-3.6c [installed]) (dependency required by @selected [set]) (dependency required by @world [argument]) I totally confused here. What is the difference of USE=loop-aes and USE=crypt? Why are the versions oscillate that way? HELP ! :) Thank you very much for any hint in advance!:) Best regards mcc See this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354451 Also, this guy wrote some blog posts regarding the issue: http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/06/loop-aes-should-it-be-treecleaned/ http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/06/loop-aes-update/ -- . O . | Djordje Todorovic [aceofknaves at G_M_A_I_L .com] | O . O . . O | GPG-Key: 2048R/1E19 (http://pgp.mit.edu) | . O O O O O | BFF2 1C7F A70D ECCD FA8F C946 DB32 B498 1E13 3339 | . O .
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 08:09:57 schrieb Mick: should I be performing some other waving in the air to make this whole thing fly? It seems like a bug to me, but I'd rather confirm I'm not missing something before reporting it. The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and instead stay with the latest 2 version ... Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work with 3.1? I'm not Dmitry but I am using 3.1 too. 3.1 is set as default by stage1 for some time now. No issues with 3.1 here though, at least none that are related to python. Why do they set it default by stage1 and warn not to use it at the same time? Regards, Ulrich -- http://www.ulrich-drolshagen.de
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Try setting an address manually: ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) It doesn't work: error locating host target (for route) Regards Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
# /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up and post output of /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe [ ok ] * samba - stop: smbd ... [ ok ] * samba - stop: nmbd ... [ ok ] * Unmounting network filesystems ... [ ok ] /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe * net.eth0: error loading /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to stop (command unobtenaible) Of course, ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up didn't give an answer! What's the IP of your router? 192.168.1.1 Thank's a lot for your help Thanasis Roger
[gentoo-user] Re: polish fonts xorg.conf
On 06/14/2011 09:02 AM, fajfu...@wp.pl wrote: Hello When I execute: setxkbmap pl I can type polish fonts in xterm and other X programs. But when I generate xorg.conf file with Xorg -configure and add the following to it I cannot type the polish fonts (I copied it to /etc/x11/xorg.conf) Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayoutpl EndSection Xorg.0.log: [ 29007.715] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [ 29008.100] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Power Button (type: KEYBOARD) [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_rules evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_model evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_layout us The only problem I can see at the moment is that the log file says that your keyboard is using the 'evdev' driver but your xorg.conf specifies the 'kbd' driver. Try changing the Driver to evdev instead of 'kbd'.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/14/2011 10:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up and post output of /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe [ ok ] * samba - stop: smbd ... [ ok ] * samba - stop: nmbd ... [ ok ] * Unmounting network filesystems ... [ ok ] /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe * net.eth0: error loading /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net * ERROR: net.eth0 failed to stop (command unobtenaible) Run these (in sequence) as root (and post output): # echo /etc/conf.d/net # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up # ifconfig # ping 192.168.1.1
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Run these (in sequence) as root (and post output): # echo /etc/conf.d/net # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up # ifconfig # ping 192.168.1.1 Bad luck: it fails. Bureau cahn # echo /etc/conf.d/net Bureau cahn # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ] * Bringing down interface eth0 * Stopping dhcpcd on eth0 ... [ ok ] * Removing addresses * 192.168.1.20/24 Bureau cahn # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap * Manually resetting net.eth0 to stopped state Bureau cahn # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up Bureau cahn # ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db inet adr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:44db/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:662 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:147085 (143.6 KiB) Interruption:17 loLien encap:Boucle locale inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0 adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:Hôte UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:39878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmission:0 RX bytes:3166048 (3.0 MiB) TX bytes:3166048 (3.0 MiB) Bureau cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable Thanks for help Roger
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/14/2011 11:36 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: snip Bureau cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine?
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=3.96 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=3.94 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=7.46 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=4.65 ms c64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=3.85 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=7.10 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=4.38 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=3.99 ms ^C --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9024ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.851/4.708/7.465/1.316 ms
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 18:44:43 Cahn Roger wrote: Try setting an address manually: ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) It doesn't work: error locating host target (for route) Hmm ... something is not right at the router, or your ethernet cable is faulty/unplugged. Are you sure that 192.168.1.1 is the correct address for it? After you set on the command line your ip address using ifconfig run this: arping -c 3 -I eth0 192.168.1.1 If your router is not responding, please check its firewall list and any access control lists you may have set up for it - you may have typed incorrectly the MAC address for your eth0 NIC. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote: # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up and post output of /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net file - or look at the example file provided and use that to define static address/broadcast/netmask correctly. Typically something like: config_eth0=192.168.1.20/24 should do it. If you want to define a static route and dns server add: routes_eth0=default via 192.168.1.1 dns_servers_eth0=192.168.1.1 HTH. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms Try changing ethernet cable and switch port for the pc that has the problem, and ping the router again. Then if the problem persists, delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and swap the network card (if it's not onboard) with another (PCI) that you know is good. If the card is onboard, do not delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, just add a PCI NIC, connect the ethernet cable to this new PCI NIC and try to ping the router.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: polish fonts xorg.conf
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:51:42 walt wrote: On 06/14/2011 09:02 AM, fajfu...@wp.pl wrote: Hello When I execute: setxkbmap pl I can type polish fonts in xterm and other X programs. But when I generate xorg.conf file with Xorg -configure and add the following to it I cannot type the polish fonts (I copied it to /etc/x11/xorg.conf) Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayoutpl EndSection Xorg.0.log: [ 29007.715] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [ 29008.100] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Power Button (type: KEYBOARD) [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_rules evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_model evdev [ 29008.100] (**) Option xkb_layout us The only problem I can see at the moment is that the log file says that your keyboard is using the 'evdev' driver but your xorg.conf specifies the 'kbd' driver. Try changing the Driver to evdev instead of 'kbd'. and when all is working as intended with evdev, you may want to add this to be able to write in both Polish and English: Option XkbLayout pl,us Option XkbOptions grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll,compose:menu,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp The Alt+Shift will allow you to toggle between the two language keyboards in X. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of: ethtool eth0
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: snip You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). /etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults to dhcp.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
* Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [110614 17:20]: On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote: # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up and post output of /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le fichier existe /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net file - or look at the example file provided and use that to define static address/broadcast/netmask correctly. Typically something like: config_eth0=192.168.1.20/24 should do it. If you want to define a static route and dns server add: routes_eth0=default via 192.168.1.1 dns_servers_eth0=192.168.1.1 HTH. -- Regards, Mick Well his /etc/conf.d/net file is now toast after what Thanasis had him do. So they're out of there now. :-) Todd
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: snip You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). /etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults to dhcp. Sure, but if he had then he wouldn't be getting all these configuration errors when he tried to stop the service. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following: On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: snip You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). /etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults to dhcp. Sure, but if he had then he wouldn't be getting all these configuration errors when he tried to stop the service. He shouldn't get those anymore with an empty file either.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 01:31 AM Thanasis wrote the following: on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following: On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: snip You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line from the /etc/conf.d/net He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). /etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults to dhcp. Sure, but if he had then he wouldn't be getting all these configuration errors when he tried to stop the service. He shouldn't get those anymore with an empty file either. If one wants to rebuild the /etc/conf.d/net file, he should take a look at the example file /usr/share/doc/openrc-*/net.example as a guide.
Re: [gentoo-user] Internet
on 06/15/2011 12:57 AM Thanasis wrote the following: on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of: ethtool eth0 f you don't have ethtool, post the output of: # dmesg | grep eth
[gentoo-user] KDE text to speech and talkers
Has anyone been able to set up TTS in KDE 4.6.3? I've tried again and again but I am still unable to get any Talkers to show up. I zapped kttsd and now am using jovie but, alas, no joy from jovie am I receiving. Maybe I don't see something basic, but I don't see what it is. I've gotten this to work fine on my previous KDE 4 installs, but this is frustrating. Bill -- Bill Longman Εν αρχη ην ὁ λογος
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?
On 06/14/2011 12:09 AM, Mick wrote: The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and instead stay with the latest 2 version ... Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work with 3.1? If memory serves me right it was on this list that I picked up the idea that things are working just fine with 3.1, not to mention that most packages are smart enough to know which python they need with PYTHON_API variables sprinkled around ebuilds. So I was quite surprised to uncover this one.
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde?
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 01:09:28 Dmitry Makovey wrote: On 06/14/2011 12:09 AM, Mick wrote: The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and instead stay with the latest 2 version ... Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work with 3.1? If memory serves me right it was on this list that I picked up the idea that things are working just fine with 3.1, not to mention that most packages are smart enough to know which python they need with PYTHON_API variables sprinkled around ebuilds. So I was quite surprised to uncover this one. Indeed package deps should take advantage of python3 as long as it has been installed, if the package needs python3: === # eselect news read 3 2010-03-25-python-3.1 Title Python 3.1 AuthorArfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org Posted2010-03-25 Revision 1 Python 3 is a new major version of Python and is intentionally incompatible with Python 2. Many external modules have not been ported yet to Python 3, so Python 2 still needs to be installed. You can benefit from having Python 3 installed without setting Python 3.1 as main active version of Python. Currently you should not set Python 3.1 as main active version of Python. When setting it becomes recommended, a separate news item will be created to notify users. Although Python 3.1 should not be set as main active version of Python, you should run python-updater after installation of Python 3.1. By default, modules that support both Python 2 and Python 3 are installed for both the active version of Python 2 and the active version of Python 3 when both Python 2 and Python 3 are installed. It is recommended to use a UTF-8 locale to avoid potential problems. Especially C and POSIX locales are discouraged. If locale has not been explicitly set, then POSIX locale is used, so you should ensure that locale has been set. Problems occurring only with non-UTF-8 locales should be reported directly to upstream developers of given packages. See http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/utf-8.xml for more information about UTF-8. === This news item and the elog messages/warnings make me think that python3 time has not come yet. YMMV -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
