Here the result with option-c:
md5sum -c livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso
md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: No such file or directory
DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: FAILED open or read
md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-purple.png: No such file or directory
DVD-hybrid-amd64-purple.png: FAILED open or read
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:26:27 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Pointers are very welcome!
May not apply now, but somebody was having kernel panics and
network problems,etc last year.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-960140-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:05:33 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct...
Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS.
So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL
md5sums are incorrect but the
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:34:25 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
Here the result with option-c:
md5sum -c livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso
md5sum: DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: No such file or directory
DVD-hybrid-amd64-blue.png: FAILED open or read
[snip]
md5sum: WARNING: 15504459 lines are
On Mar 14, 2014 2:42 PM, Edward M edwardm.gentoo.j...@live.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:26:27 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Pointers are very welcome!
May not apply now, but somebody was having kernel panics and
network problems,etc last year.
So, after some additional tries I (again) hashed against a couple of recently
downloaded files (f.e. Ubunto Studio, some smaller files I need for
web-development etc pp) and the hashes are correct. (md5 as is sha...). So far
are the mentioned 'hardware-faults' totally abstruse and further not
By the way and like I mentioned, the file-sizes are correct!
On Friday 14 Mar 2014 12:41:22 Guido Budack wrote:
So far are the mentioned 'hardware-faults' totally abstruse and further not
topic related comments unwanted.
If your memory is faulty, or your PSU is playing up you could find that the
hash calculated is wrong. It only takes on bit to flip
Hello Mick,
Yes, I know that, I am aware of it...
you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is observing the
IT-development of the past 25 years with highest attention...
However, the hashes of about 5 other files I downloaded (and as I said some
bigger ones too) are
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:15:38 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is
observing the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest
attention...
How is anyone supposed to know your level of experience when you don't
let on?
You haven't
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:43:37 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
By the way and like I mentioned, the file-sizes are correct!
Where did you get the file sizes? The mirror only shows approximate sizes
and the only reported size I recall seeing in this thread was from du,
which is not file size.
FYI
%
On Friday 14 Mar 2014 13:15:38 Guido Budack wrote:
Hello Mick,
Yes, I know that, I am aware of it...
you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is observing
the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest attention... However,
the hashes of about 5 other files I
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
No, the filesize is and was the same...
I'm really astonished...
Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to discuss.
I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe at the end of the month
and report to the community
It doesn't make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/14/14 18:01, Guido Budack wrote:
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished...
Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to
discuss. I'll repeat the whole procedure
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:01:09 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
It was 2/dev/null, to get rid of all the irrelevant complaints about
missing files. Have you actually tried running md5sum -c on the DIGESTS
file instead of the ISO?
I just can say that the filesize is the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list.
I have for some time now been trying to avoid using passwords as much as
possible, preferring encryption keys instead (e.g. public private key
encryption like gpg and such). I have also started using longer
randomised passwords I shouldn't
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:31:32 +0100
Thomas Sigurdsen thomas.sigurd...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list.
I have for some time now been trying to avoid using passwords as much
as possible, preferring
On 15/03/14 03:29, Guido Budack wrote:
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
ahh ... its running, but its NOT running correctly! (if you are
referring to what I think you are)
check if you have caching/buffering between you and the file (i.e., is
it over
19 matches
Mail list logo
