Re: [gentoo-user] Profile 17.0 change and app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4

On Saturday, 2 December 2017 15:12:51 GMT Corbin wrote: > Just for the sake of curiosity ... > > Have you tried to compile with this > > CPPFLAGS="-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=1" > > added to make.conf ? I've added this to the command line and it failed at the same point - see below. > The

[gentoo-user] Profile 17.0 change and app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4

app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4 also fails to install: [snip ...] Making all in utils make[2]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4/work/ cdrdao-1.2.3/utils'

Re: [gentoo-user] Profile 17.0 change and app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4

On Saturday, 2 December 2017 13:15:58 GMT Mick wrote: > app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4 also fails to install: [snip ...] > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.4.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin > /ld: toc2mp3-toc2mp3.o: warning: relocation against `bitrate_table' in > readonly section

[gentoo-user] profile 17.0 change and net-libs/webkit-gtk

FYI : Since the profile change, 2 versions of net-libs/webkit-gtk began failing to compile. net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.18.3:4 net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200:2 Both had the same failures. JavaScript support related. - net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r1:3 did compile. Corbin

Re: [gentoo-user] Profile 17.0 change and app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4

On 12/02/2017 07:15 AM, Mick wrote: > app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4 also fails to install: > > [snip ...] > Making all in utils > > make[2]: Entering directory

Re: [gentoo-user] Profile 17.0 change and app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Mick wrote: > app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4 also fails to install: > > [snip ...] > Making all in utils > make[2]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3-r4/work/ > cdrdao-1.2.3/utils' > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

On 02-12-2017 ,13:28:37, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > This profile change seems to have hit a few people in sensitive > locations. > > What is the upshot of this change? Can I eyeball the diff _before_ I > sync ? This is what the news item states: = ~ $ eselect news

[gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

On 2017-12-02 20:14, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> You're seeing a lot of reports because there is a news item telling > >> people to switch to the new profile and run "emerge -e @world". > > > > Does this mean that "emerge -e @world" should be run or that the > > news item is wrong in this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

Am Sat, 2 Dec 2017 18:33:09 -0500 schrieb Michael Orlitzky : > You're seeing a lot of reports because there is a news item telling > people to switch to the new profile and run "emerge -e @world". Does this mean that "emerge -e @world" should be run or that the news item is

[gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

I'm getting this error after I changed my profile as per '2017-11-30-new-17- profiles' news item: >>> Compiling source in /data/tmp_var/portage/sys-boot/grub-0.97-r16/work/ grub-0.97 ... make -j5 -l12.8 make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/data/tmp_var/portage/sys-boot/grub-0.97-r16/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

> * Select the new profile with eselect > * Re-emerge, in this sequence, gcc, binutils, and glibc > emerge -1 sys-devel/gcc:6.4.0 > emerge -1 sys-devel/binutils > emerge -1 sys-libs/glibc > * Rebuild your entire system > emerge -e @world > Would emerge -e --exclude gcc --exclude

[gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

Hi, the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says that one needs to rebuild @world. Is this technically needed? Would it be possible to do this on base of the daily updates intead all in one go? Background: I simply need my PC more often as it would allow me to wait (and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

On 12/02/2017 09:18 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> >> You do need to run "emerge -e @world", unless you happened to be using >> a hardened toolchain already. > > But only if you in fact switch the new profile on, right? Right. > There seems to be another thing afoot, though. All (or nearly so) >

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

On 12/02/2017 09:15 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says > that one needs to rebuild @world. > > Is this technically needed? Yes, unless you were already using a hardened toolchain. > Would it be possible to do this on base

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

On 12/02/2017 09:32 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > > Does having the hardened USE flag enabled = having a hardened toolchain? If only it were that simple... what you really need to know is, did you build everything on your system with PIE enabled? * Some packages have "pie" USE flags, and it's only

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:26:55 +0100 schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > If the compilation will fail at a certain point (and it will fail, > since this is a complete new thing) -- would it be possible to resume > even some tweaks, hacks and patches (even certain recompilations) > would be needed in between?

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:45:59 +0100 schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Suppose one would do an emerge @world...and then BOOOM! a powerfailyre > would stop the whole thing. In such a case you should consider buying a UPS. Can't you do this over night or a weekend? And how often do you have a power

[gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what?

Hi, I started emerge -e @world and it stops with this message: The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) # /usr/portage/profiles/releases/17.0/package.mask: #

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Manuel McLure wrote: > Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years > with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with > > CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:15 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says > > that one needs to rebuild @world. > > > > Is this technically needed? > > Yes, unless

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what?

On 12/03 06:16, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 05:43:39 +0100 > schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > > Hi, > > > > I started emerge -e @world > > > > and it stops with this message: > > > > The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: > > (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

On 12/03 04:35, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:26:55 +0100 > schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > > If the compilation will fail at a certain point (and it will fail, > > since this is a complete new thing) -- would it be possible to resume > > even some tweaks, hacks and patches (even

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 04:26:55 +0100 schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Delaying would not solve the problem as it is... Btw., if you're using the testing tree (e.g. ~amd64) you should do a gcc upgrade instead of rebuilding gcc as the news item says. Unfortunately the news item explicitly mentions

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what?

Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 05:43:39 +0100 schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Hi, > > I started emerge -e @world > > and it stops with this message: > > The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: > (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) > # required by @selected > #

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

> How can I check, whether a binary is "PIE"-conform ("pie-conform" is > a freaky funny language hack :) ;) ) ? > emerge hardening-check # hardening-check /usr/bin/cpuid2cpuflags /usr/bin/cpuid2cpuflags: Position Independent Executable: yes Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: yes

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what?

Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 06:29:29 +0100 schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > I already did this... There are two things which emerge can tell you with this message. 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions. 2. You have installed a package that depend on sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 or

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" I have the possibility of upgrading the system to a first-generation

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

On 12/02 09:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:15 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says > > that one needs to rebuild @world. > > > > Is this technically needed? > > Yes, unless you were already using a

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge does want to tell me...what?

Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sun, 3 Dec 2017 06:29:29 +0100 > schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > >> I already did this... > There are two things which emerge can tell you with this message. > > 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions. > > 2. You have installed a package that depend

[gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

This profile change seems to have hit a few people in sensitive locations. What is the upshot of this change? Can I eyeball the diff _before_ I sync ? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

On 12/02/2017 04:28 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > This profile change seems to have hit a few people in sensitive > locations. > > What is the upshot of this change? Can I eyeball the diff _before_ I > sync ? > The new 17.0 profile switches the default C++ version to C++14, and enables PIE/SSP by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

On 12/02/2017 08:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sat, 2 Dec 2017 18:33:09 -0500 > schrieb Michael Orlitzky : > >> You're seeing a lot of reports because there is a news item telling >> people to switch to the new profile and run "emerge -e @world". > > Does this mean that "emerge