Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.27 segfaults

2018-12-20 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 19.12.18 um 23:11 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 19.12.18 um 19:25 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> 
>> The 4.14.x range has a few dodgy ones causing issues along the way. The
>> ones currently marked stable allow me to do a full rebuild. Some of the
>> older ones in there caused all kinds of weird issues like segfaults
>> during compile. Corrupt libraries.
>> Ended up with 4.14.65 and doing a full rebuild (emerge --empty @world)
>> before trusting it again.
> 
> I wonder what happened *now* ... no updates or rebuilds in the last days.
> 
> Will attempt kernel update but have to get access first ...

We now have a non-booting gentoo (going into systemd emergency mode) ...
something around LVM fails and so it stops booting. I remember this
issue from a year ago ... but can't access the server because of an
outdated KVM-over-IP. Wonderful xmas present ;-)

hints for cheap KVM-over-IP-boxes welcome (for one server, with VGA still)

Have a nice weekend and holidays, folks





Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On December 20, 2018 11:45:29 AM UTC, Dale  wrote:
>>
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Next upgrade idea:
>> - mainboard with NVME slot
>> - NVME drive for your OS.
>>
>> Your CPU and memory will be the next bottleneck :)
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
>
>
> Yea.  I looked into rebuilding from scratch, less the case of course. 
> I'm just not sure it would be worth the speed increase.  The biggest
> things I needed, more drive space and more memory.  The CPU was just
> on sale.  Hard to beat $75.00 for a 8 core CPU running at over 4GHz. 
> Right now, it's plenty fast.  I may consider it after I do some other
> things tho.  I plan to do a emerge -e world before to long.  I wanted
> to let the new CPU compound sort of get set in. 
>
> I might add, the new video card is way overpowered for what I do. 
> LOL  Most of the time, it maxes out at about 10% of its power and less
> than 10% for memory usage.  I really can't tell much difference from
> my old 220 to this new 650 series.  The biggest difference, the 650
> runs much cooler.  I just hope it doesn't get bored and go to sleep. 
> ;-)  Oh, when I run glxgears at full screen, it still only goes to
> about 60%.  It warms up a little but not a whole lot.
>
> Now to go see what a NVME drive is.  I don't recall ever hearing of
> those.  Sounds interesting.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-) 


OMG.  Those things are fast.  Those things make a sata drive look like a
snail or something and let's not mention the old IDE drives.  Thing is,
I've got a 160GB drive for the OS itself right now.  Even a 256GB one of
those isn't to bad price wise.  The OS is really all I'd need on that
thing anyway.  The sata drives are plenty fast enough for watching
videos etc.  I wonder, how much faster would emerges go on those
things?  One wouldn't even need portage's work directory on tmpfs with
that. 

Wow!!!

Dale

:-)  :-) 


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:37 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> I don't think it would help.  It's the speed that is the problem. It was
>> almost impossible to read anything with my old CPU. It's nothing but a
>> blur with this new one.  Mostly, I saw red letters and what looked like
>> the word "error". 
> Record a video of the screen while booting and play it back in slow
> motion. It's low tech but it works with all errors, even those from
> GRUB ;-)
>
>


The only video camera I have is one built into my still picture camera. 
I can tell you, it ain't much resolution wise.  It might help but at the
speed things are scrolling up and how basic that camera's video function
is, I don't know.  Might be worth a shot tho. 

What gets me, error or not, the system is running fine.  I haven't
noticed anything not working either.  No clue what it could be.  I got
another part coming in tomorrow so I'll likely have to shutdown in the
next couple days.  I'm just about ready to start rearranging my hard
drives and such.

While at it.  I have most of my hard drives in front of the large 230mm
front fan in my case.  I have a Cooler Master HAF 932.  One drive is up
on the top part, no fan there but it has plenty of air holes and a tiny
amount of air gets sucked in and over the drive(s).  The drive runs at
86F.  My other drives that are in front of that fan runs a little
cooler, 77F.  That little bit warmer won't affect the life of the drive
will it?  From what I've read, some run just fine even when over 100F. 
Just checking.  If needed, I can get a fan mounted in there somehow.  I
have to say, I like the cooling on this case.  Those large fans can move
some air. 

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:13:37 -0600, Dale wrote:

> I don't think it would help.  It's the speed that is the problem. It was
> almost impossible to read anything with my old CPU. It's nothing but a
> blur with this new one.  Mostly, I saw red letters and what looked like
> the word "error". 

Record a video of the screen while booting and play it back in slow
motion. It's low tech but it works with all errors, even those from
GRUB ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Joystick: (n.) a device essential for performing business tasks and
training exercises esp. favored by pilots, tank commanders, riverboat
  gamblers, and medieval warlords.


pgpTAzG6G2COt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 21/12/18 5:37 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-12-20, Dale  wrote:
>
>> I don't think it would help.  It's the speed that is the problem. It was
>> almost impossible to read anything with my old CPU. It's nothing but a
>> blur with this new one.  Mostly, I saw red letters and what looked like
>> the word "error". 
>>
>> If it will log the error, that is best because I can copy and paste it
>> into a search engine and find out what it means and how to fix it, if I
>> don't figure it out on my own.  May help someone else reading this tho.  ;-)
> With most more modern motherboards this is probably not an option, but
> when I'm troubleshooting that sort of thing, I tell the kernel to use
> a serial console. I connect something to the serial port that logs the
> data to a file (usually a second Linux machine running C-Kermit, but
> there are untold other options), and Bob's your uncle.
>
> With GRUB, you can usually hit  to stop autoboot, then
>  to edit the default boot options to add the
> "console=" incantation.
>
> If you really want to geek out, you can configure GRUB to use the
> serial console also (but that's not really needed for your situation).
>
> So far, I've been able to avoid buying a motherboard without at least
> one plain-old-UART on it.  These days you usually have to provide your
> own ribbon-cable-DB9 bracket, but it's still a lifesaver for obscure
> kernel problems.
>
> Another option is 'netconsole':
>
>https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Netconsole
>
> It doesn't kick in as early as a serial-console does, but it it might
> be early enough if the NIC driver and netconsole drivers are compiled
> into the kernel as opposed to being a loadable module.
>
Tried this? /etc/rc.conf

# rc_logger launches a logging daemon to log the entire rc process to
# /var/log/rc.log
# NOTE: Linux systems require the devfs service to be started before
# logging can take place and as such cannot log the sysinit runlevel.
rc_logger="YES"

# Through rc_log_path you can specify a custom log file.
# The default value is: /var/log/rc.log
rc_log_path="/var/log/rc.log"

BillK





[gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-12-20, Dale  wrote:

> I don't think it would help.  It's the speed that is the problem. It was
> almost impossible to read anything with my old CPU. It's nothing but a
> blur with this new one.  Mostly, I saw red letters and what looked like
> the word "error". 
>
> If it will log the error, that is best because I can copy and paste it
> into a search engine and find out what it means and how to fix it, if I
> don't figure it out on my own.  May help someone else reading this tho.  ;-)

With most more modern motherboards this is probably not an option, but
when I'm troubleshooting that sort of thing, I tell the kernel to use
a serial console. I connect something to the serial port that logs the
data to a file (usually a second Linux machine running C-Kermit, but
there are untold other options), and Bob's your uncle.

With GRUB, you can usually hit  to stop autoboot, then
 to edit the default boot options to add the
"console=" incantation.

If you really want to geek out, you can configure GRUB to use the
serial console also (but that's not really needed for your situation).

So far, I've been able to avoid buying a motherboard without at least
one plain-old-UART on it.  These days you usually have to provide your
own ribbon-cable-DB9 bracket, but it's still a lifesaver for obscure
kernel problems.

Another option is 'netconsole':

   https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Netconsole

It doesn't kick in as early as a serial-console does, but it it might
be early enough if the NIC driver and netconsole drivers are compiled
into the kernel as opposed to being a loadable module.

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! Everybody is going
  at   somewhere!!  It's probably
  gmail.coma garage sale or a disaster
   Movie!!




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 20/12/2018 06:41, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I just installed a new video card.  After a couple weeks of USPS
>> dragging it around, it finally came in.  Anyway, I got it installed and
>> was booting up.  I noticed somewhere between the kernel part and it
>> going through the runlevel part, there was something that failed.  I saw
>> a little red colored text and the word failed but I found one bad thing
>> about a really fast CPU.  It scrolls by so fast, I can't tell what it
>> is.
>
> You should probably add the "quiet" option to your kernel command line
> in Grub. It will silence all useless noise, and should (I think) only
> print errors if they occur.
>
> Worth a try.
>
>
>


I don't think it would help.  It's the speed that is the problem. It was
almost impossible to read anything with my old CPU. It's nothing but a
blur with this new one.  Mostly, I saw red letters and what looked like
the word "error". 

If it will log the error, that is best because I can copy and paste it
into a search engine and find out what it means and how to fix it, if I
don't figure it out on my own.  May help someone else reading this tho.  ;-)

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 20/12/2018 06:41, Dale wrote:

Howdy,

I just installed a new video card.  After a couple weeks of USPS
dragging it around, it finally came in.  Anyway, I got it installed and
was booting up.  I noticed somewhere between the kernel part and it
going through the runlevel part, there was something that failed.  I saw
a little red colored text and the word failed but I found one bad thing
about a really fast CPU.  It scrolls by so fast, I can't tell what it
is.


You should probably add the "quiet" option to your kernel command line 
in Grub. It will silence all useless noise, and should (I think) only 
print errors if they occur.


Worth a try.




Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
Steve Dibb  wrote:

> On 12/4/18 3:31 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Dale  wrote:
> > 
> >> So as usual, they are not very Linux friendly.  Figures.  I was hoping
> > 
> > The main problem with Linux is that the drivers at SCSI level in the kernel 
> > are
> > worse than they could be, so if you like to get better results, you should
> > encourage the kernel people to do their homework.
> > 
> > One of the biggest problem on Linux is e.g. that the SCSI drivers only 
> > return
> > 16 bytes of error information, but the standard says that the error 
> > information
> > contains at least 18 bytes.
>
> That's good to know. Are there any open source OSes that do it properly? 
> I'd love to look at their code.

Check Solaris and FreeBSD...

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.net(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/'



Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Steve Dibb

On 12/4/18 3:31 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:

Dale  wrote:


So as usual, they are not very Linux friendly.  Figures.  I was hoping


The main problem with Linux is that the drivers at SCSI level in the kernel are
worse than they could be, so if you like to get better results, you should
encourage the kernel people to do their homework.

One of the biggest problem on Linux is e.g. that the SCSI drivers only return
16 bytes of error information, but the standard says that the error information
contains at least 18 bytes.


That's good to know. Are there any open source OSes that do it properly? 
I'd love to look at their code.





Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
Steve Dibb  wrote:

> > With software that operates at block driver level, you depend on the error
> > recovery features from the OS driver.
>
> OS driver, do you mean for SCSI in Linux or the driver for that ATA chipset?

No, the high level driver that deals with attached hard disks and that also 
serves CD/DVD/BluRay drives.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.net(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/'



Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Steve Dibb

On 12/14/18 3:31 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:

Steve Dibb  wrote:


On 12/3/18 9:27 AM, Pouru Lasse wrote:

I've got a bunch of scratched disc-based games (PS2, Xbox 360) that I'd
like to check for errors. Is there any program for Linux that does this?
I found and tried dvdisaster, but it only works for CDs, not
DVDs. Everything else seems to be Windows-only.

- Lasse


For DVDs, I use ddrescue. Keep a log of it as well in case you want to
do a second pass or just see where it's puking. Use its blocksize of 2048:

ddrescue -b 2048 /dev/sr0 dvd.iso ddrescue.log

readcd is better for any optical media as it is able to directly send SCSI
commands. Note that readcd implements the error recovery from sdd(1), that
exists since 35 years and I also prefer for normal disks.
That's way cool to know. MakeMKV does the same thing - it rips stuff 
directly using SCSI commands, and you have to have SCSI generic driver 
support (/dev/sg*) enabled in the kernel for it to work.


With software that operates at block driver level, you depend on the error
recovery features from the OS driver.


OS driver, do you mean for SCSI in Linux or the driver for that ATA chipset?




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread YUE Daian
On 2018-12-20 10:42, Michael Orlitzky  wrote:
> On 12/20/18 10:25 AM, YUE Daian wrote:
>> 
>> Did anyone ever considered using GitLab?
>> Its community edition is quiet enough I think.
>> 
>
> Yes, but there's a small problem: we would need to run our own instance 
> of Gitlab to prevent some of the same problems that exist with Github 
> (like losing all of our data if they go out of business).
>
> The "run your own" version of Gitlab is a bit of a nightmare, being 
> built with Ruby on Rails. It has a million dependencies, many of which 
> are hard to package because rubygems/bundler are awful and encourage 
> worst practices. Gitlab upstream expects you to run a version that 
> bundles everything it uses.
>
> What's the security strategy for something with a million bundled 
> libraries? There is none, which makes following their advice pretty 
> irresponsible, too.
>
> For all its flaws, BugZilla is pretty stable software that uses stable 
> libraries in an ecosystem inhabited by adults. Our infra team are all 
> volunteers, too -- so we need an alternative that isn't way more work 
> for them to run.

That sounds reasonable...

I did not notice that "run your own" version of GitLab has so many
security issues.

I have only configured it in an intranet.

I am just concerned that the current gap between official announcement
and reality is not good for maintenance of packages.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky

On 12/20/18 10:25 AM, YUE Daian wrote:


Did anyone ever considered using GitLab?
Its community edition is quiet enough I think.



Yes, but there's a small problem: we would need to run our own instance 
of Gitlab to prevent some of the same problems that exist with Github 
(like losing all of our data if they go out of business).


The "run your own" version of Gitlab is a bit of a nightmare, being 
built with Ruby on Rails. It has a million dependencies, many of which 
are hard to package because rubygems/bundler are awful and encourage 
worst practices. Gitlab upstream expects you to run a version that 
bundles everything it uses.


What's the security strategy for something with a million bundled 
libraries? There is none, which makes following their advice pretty 
irresponsible, too.


For all its flaws, BugZilla is pretty stable software that uses stable 
libraries in an ecosystem inhabited by adults. Our infra team are all 
volunteers, too -- so we need an alternative that isn't way more work 
for them to run.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread YUE Daian
On 2018-12-20 09:18, Michael Orlitzky  wrote:
> On 12/20/18 6:28 AM, (Nuno Silva) wrote:

>>> Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
>>> suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.
>>>
>>> Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
>>> If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
>>> misunderstanding.
>> 
>> I would like to ask again for a clarification about this. Last month, I
>> asked if there was some rule against using bugzilla, but there were no
>> replies:
>> 
>
> BugZilla is right place. If you open a PR on Github, you'll get an 
> automated message telling you to open an associated bug on BugZilla.
> If Github ever goes away, all of the PR history it contains will be lost 
> forever.
>
> Since Github is proprietary, forcing people to use it is against our 
> social contract, and many developers completely ignore everything you 
> post there.
>
> On the other hand, casually reading the contents of a PR is easier on 
> Github than with patches on BugZilla. For best results, do both.

Did anyone ever considered using GitLab?
Its community edition is quiet enough I think.

Being able to comment directly on ebuilds/patches would be a really nice
feature. IMO It makes communication efficiency much higher compared to
compared to Bugzilla.

Also since the GitLab server is hosted by the community, no Micro$oft
get involved...



Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On December 20, 2018 11:45:29 AM UTC, Dale  wrote:
>
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 20 December 2018 08:12:43 GMT Dale wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help. When I boot next time, maybe it will
> log the error and I can see what is going on. 
>
> You could also try CTRL-S to pause the screen update and
> CTRL-Q to let it continue. 
>
>
>
> I did try page up, up arrow and such.  I was trying to get at least one
> or two keywords to look into.  Thing is, it is so fast. My old 4 core
> booted pretty quick but this new 8 core with faster clock speeds is
> seriously fast.  It goes from the kernel starting to load to sddm
> starting in seconds.  I'm not sure if the extra memory helps at that
> point or not but the faster and extra cores sure does.  I'll try to
> remember that ctrl s.  I just better have my fingers ready.  lol 
>
> If I had a sdd drive for the OS to be on, I guess it would be even
> faster.  vvrrrm vvvrrrm
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-) 
>
>
> Next upgrade idea:
> - mainboard with NVME slot
> - NVME drive for your OS.
>
> Your CPU and memory will be the next bottleneck :)
>
>
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 


Yea.  I looked into rebuilding from scratch, less the case of course. 
I'm just not sure it would be worth the speed increase.  The biggest
things I needed, more drive space and more memory.  The CPU was just on
sale.  Hard to beat $75.00 for a 8 core CPU running at over 4GHz.  Right
now, it's plenty fast.  I may consider it after I do some other things
tho.  I plan to do a emerge -e world before to long.  I wanted to let
the new CPU compound sort of get set in. 

I might add, the new video card is way overpowered for what I do.  LOL 
Most of the time, it maxes out at about 10% of its power and less than
10% for memory usage.  I really can't tell much difference from my old
220 to this new 650 series.  The biggest difference, the 650 runs much
cooler.  I just hope it doesn't get bored and go to sleep.  ;-)  Oh,
when I run glxgears at full screen, it still only goes to about 60%.  It
warms up a little but not a whole lot.

Now to go see what a NVME drive is.  I don't recall ever hearing of
those.  Sounds interesting.

Dale

:-)  :-) 


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 8:39 AM Nils Freydank  wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2018, 12:28:17 CET schrieb Nuno Silva:
> > On 2018-12-20, YUE Daian wrote:
> > > On 2018-12-20 03:50, Nils Freydank  wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> Additionally bugzilla is seen as too impractical to use for new packages
> > >> that many don't get much attention there, only on github.com.
> > >
> > > Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
> > > suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.
> > >
> > > Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
> > > If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
> > > misunderstanding.
>
> from my perspective it seems as only github.com is used and bugs.gentoo.org
> is more or less just kept as an official way for ebuild submission to keep
> a backup mechanism on the own infrastructure.

IMO this is largely the reality of the situation.  The people doing
the most work on unmaintained packages or proxy-maintained packages
prefer the github PR workflow over bugzilla.  But, officially Gentoo's
social contract can't rely on that as the official mechanism.
Probably wouldn't hurt to at least mention the "alternative" in the
wiki article though.

It is a somewhat contentious issue.  But, in the end it boils down to
more eyes if you use the unofficial method.  Nobody will tell you not
to do it the official way.

> Maybe in a perfect world someone trustworthy could provide a single-sign-on
> service for bugtrackers and a gitlab instance hosted by gentoo or stuff like
> that, but the current state is quite confusing, agreed.

IMO issue/PR tracking is a bigger unsolved problem than that.  I think
we really need a truly distributed solution for this, so that every
service like github/gitlab/etc isn't reinventing the wheel here.

gitlab does have FOSS issue tracking at least.  I haven't used it to
compare it with bugzilla/etc as to whether it is a viable subsitute.
Gitlab.com will offer free hosting to FOSS projects.  It has been
discussed a bit on the various lists for Gentoo but I think the sense
is that it isn't such a huge improvement to be worth a big move.  It
is more FOSS than Github of course, but of course you can implement
the core of github (git itself) as pure FOSS also.

FWIW I know somebody who has access to all the gitlab source and I
trust him when he says that the FOSS community edition is the core of
the enterprise edition.  Fixes/etc in general always make their way to
the FOSS core, and their hosted gitlab.com solution uses the same FOSS
code at its core that anybody can download.

I feel like bugzilla being so centralized is a weakness for most of
the FOSS world.  If somebody denied Gentoo access to infrastructure
that would be a really hard part of the complete solution to replace.
The git part is easy - you can do a git-based workflow that is
completely distributed without much trouble.  What you can't do is
clone the issues database, work on a few, push your work on issues to
Fred, who pushes it to Sally, and then Sally sends her updates to you
along with Joe's, with all of that stuff happening in parallel with
merge conflicts handled in a sane manner.

-- 
Rich



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky

On 12/20/18 6:28 AM, (Nuno Silva) wrote:



Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.

Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
misunderstanding.


I would like to ask again for a clarification about this. Last month, I
asked if there was some rule against using bugzilla, but there were no
replies:



BugZilla is right place. If you open a PR on Github, you'll get an 
automated message telling you to open an associated bug on BugZilla.
If Github ever goes away, all of the PR history it contains will be lost 
forever.


Since Github is proprietary, forcing people to use it is against our 
social contract, and many developers completely ignore everything you 
post there.


On the other hand, casually reading the contents of a PR is easier on 
Github than with patches on BugZilla. For best results, do both.




Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread J. Roeleveld
On December 20, 2018 11:45:29 AM UTC, Dale  wrote:
>Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Thursday, 20 December 2018 08:12:43 GMT Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the
>error
>>> and I can see what is going on. 
>> You could also try CTRL-S to pause the screen update and CTRL-Q to
>let it 
>> continue.
>>
>
>
>I did try page up, up arrow and such.  I was trying to get at least one
>or two keywords to look into.  Thing is, it is so fast. My old 4 core
>booted pretty quick but this new 8 core with faster clock speeds is
>seriously fast.  It goes from the kernel starting to load to sddm
>starting in seconds.  I'm not sure if the extra memory helps at that
>point or not but the faster and extra cores sure does.  I'll try to
>remember that ctrl s.  I just better have my fingers ready.  lol 
>
>If I had a sdd drive for the OS to be on, I guess it would be even
>faster.  vvrrrm vvvrrrm
>
>Dale
>
>:-)  :-) 

Next upgrade idea:
- mainboard with NVME slot
- NVME drive for your OS.

Your CPU and memory will be the next bottleneck :)


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread Nils Freydank
Hi everyone,

Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2018, 12:28:17 CET schrieb Nuno Silva:
> On 2018-12-20, YUE Daian wrote:
> > On 2018-12-20 03:50, Nils Freydank  wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Additionally bugzilla is seen as too impractical to use for new packages
> >> that many don't get much attention there, only on github.com.
> > 
> > Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
> > suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.
> > 
> > Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
> > If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
> > misunderstanding.

from my perspective it seems as only github.com is used and bugs.gentoo.org
is more or less just kept as an official way for ebuild submission to keep
a backup mechanism on the own infrastructure.

Maybe in a perfect world someone trustworthy could provide a single-sign-on 
service for bugtrackers and a gitlab instance hosted by gentoo or stuff like 
that, but the current state is quite confusing, agreed. If you want to take 
care of your package become a proxied maintainer. If you go a step further 
later and become a gentoo dev you can also drop some workload from the proxied 
maintenance team and do you QA yourself and submit directly to the tree.

> I would like to ask again for a clarification about this. Last month, I
> asked if there was some rule against using bugzilla, but there were no
> replies:
> [...]
No, as far as I know there is now rule, just a not so good usable platform and 
another one that is proprietary but works far better.


A disclaimer in the end: I'm not a Gentoo developer, just another random user
who maintains packages.

Regards,
Nils

-- 
GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B'
Nils Freydank

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 December 2018 08:12:43 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the error
>> and I can see what is going on. 
> You could also try CTRL-S to pause the screen update and CTRL-Q to let it 
> continue.
>


I did try page up, up arrow and such.  I was trying to get at least one
or two keywords to look into.  Thing is, it is so fast. My old 4 core
booted pretty quick but this new 8 core with faster clock speeds is
seriously fast.  It goes from the kernel starting to load to sddm
starting in seconds.  I'm not sure if the extra memory helps at that
point or not but the faster and extra cores sure does.  I'll try to
remember that ctrl s.  I just better have my fingers ready.  lol 

If I had a sdd drive for the OS to be on, I guess it would be even
faster.  vvrrrm vvvrrrm

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread nunojsilva
On 2018-12-20, YUE Daian wrote:

> On 2018-12-20 03:50, Nils Freydank  wrote:
>> Hi Danny,
>>
>> first I want to thank you for submitting your ebuild, and I'm quite sorry to 
>> see another contributor who doesn't get responses for a long while. This is 
>> no 
>> evil intention, just a lack of manpower and the lack of someone maintaining
>> your "new" package. (This was what jstein meant with his response[1]).
>>
> I do understand the situation of lacking manpower, also I realized made
> some mistakes in my ebuild file, so you do not have to apologize. :-)
>
>> Additionally bugzilla is seen as too impractical to use for new packages 
>> that 
>> many don't get much attention there, only on github.com.
>>
> Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
> suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.
>
> Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
> If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
> misunderstanding.

I would like to ask again for a clarification about this. Last month, I
asked if there was some rule against using bugzilla, but there were no
replies:

https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-user=154318918422492=2

I do understand lack of manpower can affect new package requests. But
there are also bug reports with patches that have had zero feedback so
far. Of course these will also be affected by a manpower shortage, but
should be easier to handle than new package requests?

-- 
Nuno Silva




Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday, December 20, 2018 9:12:43 AM CET Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On December 20, 2018 4:41:26 AM UTC, Dale  wrote:
> > Howdy,
> > 
> > I just installed a new video card.  After a couple weeks of USPS
> > dragging it around, it finally came in.  Anyway, I got it installed
> > and
> > was booting up.  I noticed somewhere between the kernel part and it
> > going through the runlevel part, there was something that failed.  I
> > saw
> > a little red colored text and the word failed but I found one bad
> > thing
> > about a really fast CPU.  It scrolls by so fast, I can't tell what it
> > is.  It is almost a blur when it scrolls up.  It's not a service
> > because
> > rc-status shows all green.  I'm not sure that lists everything tho
> > since
> > it seems a little light on the number of services. 
> > 
> > At some point way back, I recall there being a logger that picks up
> > the
> > area between when dmesg is logging and when syslog or friends start
> > logging to the message file.  I think this is where the error is.  I
> > can't find tool now.  I also can't find anything else in /var/log
> > either.  Am I wrong on having this or did it die off in the tree and
> > got
> > removed?  If so, is there something that picks up that area of the
> > boot
> > up process as far as errors go?  My system seems to work fine but I'd
> > like to know what that error was.  It may cause a problem at some
> > point
> > and could even be the problem with that random reboot I had in another
> > thread. 
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Dale
> > 
> > :-)  :-) 
> > 
> > P. S.  I did reseat all the power cables to the mobo while I was
> > swapping video cards.  Hoping that may help with that weird reboot
> > thing
> > I had going on.  BTW, it hasn't happened since the one I started the
> > thread about either.  Weird. 
> > 
> > In "rc.conf" there is an option to log to /var/log/rc.log or similar.
> > Not near a working system, so can't check actual option.
> > 
> > --
> > Joost
> 
> That gave me the clue I needed.  I was looking for a package.  No wonder
> I couldn't find it.  It was disabled in rc.conf for some reason

By default, it is disabled. My guess is that you accidentally overwrote that 
setting at some point.

> and
> based on the last date of the log file, it has been for a while, which
> is why I thought something got cleaned out or something.  I now have
> this set:
> 
> 
> 
> # NOTE: Linux systems require the devfs service to be started before
> # logging can take place and as such cannot log the sysinit runlevel.
> rc_logger="YES"
> 
> # Through rc_log_path you can specify a custom log file.
> # The default value is: /var/log/rc.log
> rc_log_path="/var/log/rc.log"
>  
> 
> Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the error
> and I can see what is going on. 

Make sure that path is mounted soon. Eg, that it isn't on a seperate 
mountpoint.

--
Joost






Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday, December 20, 2018 11:04:55 AM CET Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 December 2018 08:12:43 GMT Dale wrote:
> > Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the error
> > and I can see what is going on.
> 
> You could also try CTRL-S to pause the screen update and CTRL-Q to let it
> continue.

In my experience, this never works when it happens in the beginning as it's 
near impossible to time it right.

--
Joost






Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday, 20 December 2018 08:12:43 GMT Dale wrote:

> Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the error
> and I can see what is going on. 

You could also try CTRL-S to pause the screen update and CTRL-Q to let it 
continue.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.






Re: [gentoo-user] Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread YUE Daian
On 2018-12-20 00:31, Andrew Udvare  wrote:
>> On 2018-12-19, at 21:24, YUE Daian  wrote:
>> 
>> Is there anything I can do more?
>
> In your ebuild, remove ./bootstrap and use eautoreconf.
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-reference/autotools.eclass/

I do not know if that will work well.

I will investigate it.

Thanks.



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread YUE Daian
On 2018-12-20 03:50, Nils Freydank  wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> first I want to thank you for submitting your ebuild, and I'm quite sorry to 
> see another contributor who doesn't get responses for a long while. This is 
> no 
> evil intention, just a lack of manpower and the lack of someone maintaining
> your "new" package. (This was what jstein meant with his response[1]).
>
I do understand the situation of lacking manpower, also I realized made
some mistakes in my ebuild file, so you do not have to apologize. :-)

> Additionally bugzilla is seen as too impractical to use for new packages that 
> many don't get much attention there, only on github.com.
>
Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds
suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla.

Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way?
If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further
misunderstanding.

> However, within Gentoo every package needs a maintainer to avoid dead 
> packages 
> inside our tree (which then get no security nor "normal" bug fixes). Packages
> with "maintainer needed" state had one, but he or she just dropped the work.
> If you have some spare time you can become a proxied maintainer, meaning you 
> maintain the package without being a Gentoo dev. As git distinguishs author 
> and commiter you get also a proper attribution for your work.
>
> The workflow in general is that you clone the git repo and create branch, add 
> your ebuild, open a git PR on github.com[2] and get reviews from devs. You 
> can 
> find more details in some wiki articles[3].
>
This is the "correct" way to submit a new ebuild I suppose?

> Unfortunately it takes a bunch of time until packages are merged, because of 
> the mentioned lack of manpower on the devs' side, aswell as plenty mistakes 
> new proxied maintainers tend to implement in ebuilds (myself included here).
>
> I hope that helps you,
> Nils
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/638446#c1
> [2] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr
> [3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/User_Guide
> and https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers

I love Gentoo and I want to contribute.
I will read through the docs and have a try. Time to step forward as an
"end user"!

Thanks for helping.

Danny



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?

2018-12-20 Thread YUE Daian
On 2018-12-19 21:42, Rich Freeman  wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:24 PM YUE Daian  wrote:
>>
>> Recently I posted a bug report to Gentoo Bugzilla and submitted a
>> request to add package Roswell into the package tree.
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/638446
>>
>> But...in fact it was not "recent" at all! I submitted the bug one year
>> ago and there is literally no news after some point.
>>
>> Is there anything I can do more?
>
> You can always host it in an overlay, or try submitting it to
> proxy-maintainers.  Volunteering to proxy-maintain the package would
> probably also help - that basically involves committing to keep it up
> to date and deal with bugs/etc.
>
> The obvious QA issue I could think of with putting this in the main
> repo is where it sticks its files and how well-behaved it is.  When it
> installs lisp packages does it keep them in some kind of tidy area
> that isn't going to step on the rest of the filesystem?
> Language-specific package managers can sometimes be messy in that way.
>

Roswell installs itself system-wide, then for each user it manipulates
local directory (by default $HOME/.roswell).

There is no global install afterwards so I suppose it should be fine.

But you are right. I should have posted the file list into my bug
report.

> My guess though is that this reflects a lack of interest in lisp more
> than any specific criticism.  If somebody had a criticism they'd have
> pointed it out.
>
> I didn't look at your package too closely but one little tweak you
> should make is something like:
>
> SRC_URI="https://github.com/roswell/roswell/archive/v${PV}.zip -> ${P}.zip"
>

Good point. I will change that.

> That makes it easier to maintain by renaming the package version
> number, and it also cleans up the filename in the distfiles cache (and
> on the mirrors).
>
> -- 
> Rich

Thank you Rich!



Re: [gentoo-user] Error during boot up.

2018-12-20 Thread Dale
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On December 20, 2018 4:41:26 AM UTC, Dale  wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I just installed a new video card.  After a couple weeks of USPS
> dragging it around, it finally came in.  Anyway, I got it installed and
> was booting up.  I noticed somewhere between the kernel part and it
> going through the runlevel part, there was something that failed.  I saw
> a little red colored text and the word failed but I found one bad thing
> about a really fast CPU.  It scrolls by so fast, I can't tell what it
> is.  It is almost a blur when it scrolls up.  It's not a service because
> rc-status shows all green.  I'm not sure that lists everything tho since
> it seems a little light on the number of services. 
>
> At some point way back, I recall there being a logger that picks up the
> area between when dmesg is logging and when syslog or friends start
> logging to the message file.  I think this is where the error is.  I
> can't find tool now.  I also can't find anything else in /var/log
> either.  Am I wrong on having this or did it die off in the tree and got
> removed?  If so, is there something that picks up that area of the boot
> up process as far as errors go?  My system seems to work fine but I'd
> like to know what that error was.  It may cause a problem at some point
> and could even be the problem with that random reboot I had in another
> thread. 
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-) 
>
> P. S.  I did reseat all the power cables to the mobo while I was
> swapping video cards.  Hoping that may help with that weird reboot thing
> I had going on.  BTW, it hasn't happened since the one I started the
> thread about either.  Weird. 
>
>
> In "rc.conf" there is an option to log to /var/log/rc.log or similar.
> Not near a working system, so can't check actual option.
>
> --
> Joost
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 


That gave me the clue I needed.  I was looking for a package.  No wonder
I couldn't find it.  It was disabled in rc.conf for some reason and
based on the last date of the log file, it has been for a while, which
is why I thought something got cleaned out or something.  I now have
this set:



# NOTE: Linux systems require the devfs service to be started before
# logging can take place and as such cannot log the sysinit runlevel.
rc_logger="YES"

# Through rc_log_path you can specify a custom log file.
# The default value is: /var/log/rc.log
rc_log_path="/var/log/rc.log"
 

Thanks for the help.  When I boot next time, maybe it will log the error
and I can see what is going on. 

Dale

:-)  :-)