[gentoo-user] Sync'ing eGroupware and Kontact's calendar

Hi everyone, I decided to try Kontact's connectivity to eGroupware and have come thus far: I can now use the remote eGroupware as a resource in my calendar and can create appointments. Which is fine. But in addition I am looking for a feature that will synchronize the local calendar resource w

Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame?

Grant writes: > Shouldn't top have provided some kind of info for why the CPU usage > was 100% for 5 minutes straight? If it does display trends, shouldn't > it have picked up on that one? I bet it was updatedb. This is what top shows me when it is running: Cpu(s): 15.6% us, 12.6% sy, 0.3% ni,

[gentoo-user] Re: 'Hibernate' by power button

In , Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use the default default.sh that comes with acpid. I've only added > > a couple of files to respond to sleep and lid events. > > Okey, dokey, what do the default last couple of lines/paras look like? It lives in /usr/portage/sys

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

Hi! === On Friday 16 February 2007, you wrote: === ... > > i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DGENTOO_NSPLUGINS_DIR=\"/usr/lib/nsplugins\" > -DGENTOO_NSBROWSER_PLUGINS_DIR=\"/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins\" -fno- rtti > -fno-handle-exceptions -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align > -Woverloaded-

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

Mick writes: > /etc/acpi/default.sh: line 57: syntax error: unexpected end of file > The last few of lines of my /etc/acpi/default.sh show this much: > == > ac_adapter) > case "$value" in > # Add code here to handle

[gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

On 2007-02-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I'm getting an checksum failure on the downloaded file: > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2 > !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification > !!! Got: be84452b813bc42b0a5a0119

Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame?

When we say that top lies, we really mean that it is giving you an average over a looong period of cpu time, and you should interpret it as such. It's a trend, not an instant value. Shouldn't top have provided some kind of info for why the CPU usage was 100% for 5 minutes straight? If it do

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Friday 16 February 2007 20:45, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:06, Mick wrote: > > On Friday 16 February 2007 19:49, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > > > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 6:08, Mick wrote: > > > > Can you spot anything out of place? > > > > > > Your conf

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:06, Mick wrote: > On Friday 16 February 2007 19:49, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 6:08, Mick wrote: > > > Can you spot anything out of place? > > > > Your configs seem to all be in order. > > > > Are you sure that the acpid init scrip

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Friday 16 February 2007 19:49, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 6:08, Mick wrote: > > Can you spot anything out of place? > > Your configs seem to all be in order. > > Are you sure that the acpid init script has been started? I am sure it is running alright: ===

[gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

On 2007-02-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just now I have fetched the file from four mirrors with >> >> ('Filesize does not match recorded size', 35332, 35325) >> !!! Fetched file: mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2 VERIFY FAILED! >> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recor

Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame?

On Thursday 15 February 2007 22:02, b.n. wrote: > Michael Crute ha scritto: > >> You should use ps, top and free of course! Just realize that they lie... > > > > Seeing this thread reminded me of a blog article I saw on Virtual > > Threads a while back... > > http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006

Re: [gentoo-user] Short history in terminal (without X)

On Thursday 15 February 2007 17:01, Willie Wong wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:11:36PM +0100, Penguin Lover Roman Naumann squawked: > > How can I make the history buffer larger, or - if possible - set it > > infinitely large. (Just as the "Konsole" of KDE.) > > This might help: > http://li

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Saturday, 17 February 2007 6:08, Mick wrote: > On Friday 16 February 2007 19:13, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 5:31, Mick wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > A few weeks ago I updated acpi and hibernate and their relevant > > > configuration files. Since then when

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Friday 16 February 2007 19:13, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > On Saturday, 17 February 2007 5:31, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > A few weeks ago I updated acpi and hibernate and their relevant > > configuration files. Since then when I press the power button on my > > laptop nothing happens. >

[gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

On 2007-02-16, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >=== On Friday 16 February 2007 Grant Edwards wrote: === >> On 2007-02-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > ebuild -auvDN world has decided to emerge firefox, but it fails >> > because mozilla-firefox-2.0-patch

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

On Saturday, 17 February 2007 5:31, Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > A few weeks ago I updated acpi and hibernate and their relevant > configuration files. Since then when I press the power button on my laptop > nothing happens. > > Clearly something was changed, intentionally or otherwise, and this feat

[gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button

Hi All, A few weeks ago I updated acpi and hibernate and their relevant configuration files. Since then when I press the power button on my laptop nothing happens. Clearly something was changed, intentionally or otherwise, and this feature is no longer available to me. Would you care to poin

Re: [gentoo-user] ssh-agent

On Monday 12 February 2007 23:26, Justin Patrin wrote: > On 11/21/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Mick wrote: > > >>> They are only stored in locked memory; they are never on disk > > >>> unencrypted. Anyone that can read locked memory can access them, but > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

=== On Friday 16 February 2007 Grant Edwards wrote: === > On 2007-02-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ebuild -auvDN world has decided to emerge firefox, but it fails > > because mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2 doesn't exist > > on any of the mirrors I have c

[gentoo-user] Re: Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

On 2007-02-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ebuild -auvDN world has decided to emerge firefox, but it fails > because mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2 doesn't exist > on any of the mirrors I have configured except one -- and on > that mirror it's the wrong size. > > Where does

Re: [gentoo-user] Short history in terminal (without X)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:29:54 +0100 Jakob Buchgraber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of > > the terminal? > > How can I make the history buffer larger, or - if possible - set it > > infinitely large. (Just as the "Konsole" of KDE.) >

[gentoo-user] Problem downloading mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2

ebuild -auvDN world has decided to emerge firefox, but it fails because mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2 doesn't exist on any of the mirrors I have configured except one -- and on that mirror it's the wrong size. Where does one get a copy of mozilla-firefox-2.0-patches-1.3.tar.bz2? -- Gra

[gentoo-user] ReSolved: printing within kpdf

Petr Uzel centrum.cz> writes: > I've had exactly the same problem (broken printing from kpdf, all other > printing was ok), but after re-emerging kpdf everything worked well again. > May you should try running revdep-rebuild... All was consistent. Libraries all fine (I run revdep-rebuild fre

Re: [gentoo-user] printing within kpdf

On pátek 16 února 2007, James wrote: > Hello, > > I use to have kpdf printing with cups. Now it's broken. > Since I only print a pdf file directly form kpdf occasionally, > I'm not certain when (which emerge) it quite working.. > > > I googled and looked at bugzilla, but nothing relevant. > I re-em

[gentoo-user] printing within kpdf

Hello, I use to have kpdf printing with cups. Now it's broken. Since I only print a pdf file directly form kpdf occasionally, I'm not certain when (which emerge) it quite working.. I googled and looked at bugzilla, but nothing relevant. I re-emerged both cups and kpdf. All other printing is fine

Re: [gentoo-user] fetching timeout

=== On Friday 16 February 2007 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: === > On Friday 16 February 2007 15:48, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Where is a "place to config" timeout for diftfiles fetching from > > gentoo mirrors? Sometimes this or that mirror doesn't response, and > > all pro

Re: [gentoo-user] fetching timeout

On Friday 16 February 2007 15:48, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > Hi! > > Where is a "place to config" timeout for diftfiles fetching from > gentoo mirrors? Sometimes this or that mirror doesn't response, and > all process (with retrying) takes too long time. You can edit FETCHCOMMAND in /etc/make.conf,

[gentoo-user] fetching timeout

Hi! Where is a "place to config" timeout for diftfiles fetching from gentoo mirrors? Sometimes this or that mirror doesn't response, and all process (with retrying) takes too long time. Andrew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: thunar won't build?

On Friday 16 February 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Friday 16 February 2007 09:37:00 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > There's an upside as well though. If many people keep reporting the > > same bug in different ways, it tells themaintainer that the bug is > > higher priority. If a bug is reported o

Re: [gentoo-user] SCIRE Project

2007/2/13, Daniel van Ham Colchete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello everyone Here on my company we are going to start deploying Gentoo Linux on our customers. Every server will have the very same installed packages, the very same use flags, very same cflags, only a few configurations will differ.

[gentoo-user] ftpasswd

Can anyone tell me how to get ftpasswd tool. I reemerged proftpd 3 times. Th USE flags are: authfile clamav ssl tcpd -acl -hardened -ifsession -ipv6 -ldap -mysql -ncurses -nls -noauthunix -opensslcrypt -pam -postgres -radius -rewirite (-selinux) -shaper -sitemisc -softquota -vroot -xinetd Why i can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: thunar won't build?

On Friday 16 February 2007 09:37:00 Alan McKinnon wrote: > There's an upside as well though. If many people keep reporting the same > bug in different ways, it tells themaintainer that the bug is higher > priority. If a bug is reported only once, and everyone else that runs > into it sees this bug

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: thunar won't build?

On Thursday 15 February 2007, Grant Edwards wrote: > > I think there is nothing bad in this. At least you know: > > - the bug you are reporting is already known > > - some dev has seen it repeteadly, and repetitia iuvant* > > > > *"Repeating helps", for the non-Latin speakers :) > > Except that it

Re: [gentoo-user] Short history in terminal (without X)

On Thursday 15 February 2007, Roman Naumann wrote: > Hi, > > does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the > terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server) > I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot > scroll to the beginning of the t

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge -pv world" output: strange differences after Portage upgrade

On Friday 16 February 2007 09:19:11 brullo nulla wrote: > Ok. Now the question is: is the new dbus really installable indeed? I > think "yes" from your explanation, but I want to be triple-sure. Of course. You showed that when you provided `emerge -pv dbus` (it didn't say masked by anything)...

Re: [gentoo-user] udev and glibc update

On Friday 16 February 2007 08:25:45 Luigi Pinna wrote: > Hi, > I gave a sync 2 days ago and my world update had that output: > # emerge -upvD world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating world dependencies | > > !!! Ebuilds for the following packages are either a

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge -pv world" output: strange differences after Portage upgrade

> On second thought this does make sense. Portage 2.1.2 allows an upgrade > within the same slot despite the block. And the reason it doesn't get > pulled in by `emerge -pv world` is because dbus isn't in world and the > later version isn't required by anything in world. You need to use --update >