On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
get back to gaming so we tried to boot back into Windows but XP goes
blue screen at the first disk
Hi!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
get back to gaming so we tried to boot back into Windows but XP goes
blue screen
On Jan 7, 2008 12:15 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
get back to gaming so we tried to
To boot my linux, I faced a JMicron eSata/Pata controller problem,
that prevented my SATA disk from being recognized. = I had to use a
2.6.23 kernel, founded on the gentoo forum. (the knoppix latest
released I used were 2.6.19 !!!) Do you also have a JMicron controller
?
Is there any other
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:53:29 +0100, Galevsky wrote:
AHCI is fully supported out of the box for Microsoft Windows Vista
and the Linux operating system from kernel 2.6.19. Older operating
systems require drivers written by the host bus adapter vendor in
order to support AHCI.
The Windows
Hi
I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
using Google.
When I telnet into my postfix installation I get this:
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character
On Jan 7, 2008 1:23 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Windows install that I mentioned having problems with AHCI is Vista.
Good to know I just faced problem with AHCI on XP, and thought
that there were no matter on Vista... so install drivers first for the
whole M$ family...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:35:29 +0100
Jules Colding wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
using Google.
That's my guide, it's in Spanish, but I think you could check config
files
I see that it's now stable, and I'm going to let the emerge go forward.
However, I scrolled back my terminal to when I sent that message, and here's
what eix gave me then (primarily the ~ in front of 1.0.4. Could this be
an asychrony with the eix database?
treat portage # eix k3b
[I] app-cdr/k3b
On Monday 07 January 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I see that it's now stable, and I'm going to let the emerge go
forward. However, I scrolled back my terminal to when I sent that
message, and here's what eix gave me then (primarily the ~ in front
of 1.0.4. Could this be an asychrony with the
Johann Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Turns up nothing even close. Does it mean I'm still missing something
in the kernel build? or is it just baloney or out of date?
Hi,
you can simply check our kernel config by typing:
cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
get back to
On Monday 7 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see:
grep -i ^[^#].*conntrack /usr/src/linux/.config
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS=y
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:46:34 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 Mark Knecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look
at
On Jan 7, 2008 8:10 AM, Renat Golubchyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:46:34 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 Mark Knecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes i emerge it but after i've unmerged it.
So probably was added during this install.
Grant a écrit :
Yes i've the same:
ls /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
/lib/firmware/rt73.bin
But i don't remember to setted up it.
Well, it wasn't the kernel right? :)
Were you experimenting with driver
Yes i emerge it but after i've unmerged it.
So probably was added during this install.
What install do you think has added it?
- Grant
Yes i've the same:
ls /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
/lib/firmware/rt73.bin
But i don't remember to setted up it.
Well, it wasn't the kernel right?
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see:
grep -i ^[^#].*conntrack /usr/src/linux/.config
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m
On Monday 7 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I have compiled them directly into the kernel?
Well, this is usually a matter of debates. For iptables stuff, I
generally compile everything into the kernel, but I'm sure there are
people who can find good reasons for using modules.
Jules Colding wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
using Google.
snip
According to the guides this should be the desired output and TLS should
work, but all my mail clients
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:15 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a reason for the existence of genkernel - it's so that you don't
have to go through all this pain and suffering, and can instead remove
stuff a bit at a time with reasonable
I'm having a time getting ksh93 to install (build error at the end)
USE='static' emerge -v ksh93
The only other use flag coming up was `nls'
I wasn't real eager for `static' necessarily but without `static' had
already failed and I saw it was a possible flag. Also it might be
handy sometime in
Hi All,
I have installed gentoo on my laptop recently and I am having a huge
problem with speed.
The problem is the insanely slow disk access that I am getting.
here is some output:
manticore ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 5702 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2857.11
Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
BillK
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 02:26
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess it would be harmless to just run the `make modules_intall' part
again and catch a list.
I think you search for modprobe -l :)
Wow... and egad, look at this:
modprobe -l|wc -l
945
That is a kernel built with genkernel
--
Hello,
I just got a 500G FreeAgent (Seagate) drive.
I have it working via ivman:
/dev/sdb1 466G 144M 466G 1% /media/FreeAgent Drive
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3000 Seagate RSS LLC
I'm able to cd into it's directory tree and read various
files.
I assume it has NTFS by default. I have all
James wrote:
Hello,
I just got a 500G FreeAgent (Seagate) drive.
I have it working via ivman:
/dev/sdb1 466G 144M 466G 1% /media/FreeAgent Drive
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3000 Seagate RSS LLC
I'm able to cd into it's directory tree and read various
files.
I assume it has NTFS by
William Kenworthy wrote:
Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
BillK
On
On Jan 7, 2008 8:37 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Kenworthy wrote:
Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
Also consider moving
I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/', 'dev-java/bcprov-1.37', 'merge') pulled in by
('ebuild', '/',
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not udma5 ? All my PATA drives
On Jan 7, 2008 8:10 PM, Justin Patrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild',
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Justin Patrin wrote:
I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/',
Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not udma5
34 matches
Mail list logo
