On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:42:39 Momesso Andrea wrote:
Thanks for the advice. Will be a problem for lvm if I add a partition
before it? I mean, will I need to change any config files while lvm is
gonna reside on sda4 instead of sda3?
It's not a problem. LVM scans the drive looking for pvs and
On Sunday 22 March 2009 23:00:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:35 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:15:14 Momesso Andrea wrote:
Your data is safe if you do exactly the steps you said above.
pvresize /dev/sda3
/dev/sda3: too
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:22:20 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2009 23:00:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:35 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:15:14 Momesso Andrea wrote:
Your data is
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:18:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
I'm not real familiar with aliases but know what it is. If you use the
alias method, how would you disable it for a one time run?
If you gave the alias the same name as the command, just use the full
path to the command to call it directly. But
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:08 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
It looks more like a workaround than a solution. If my non native
English understood it well, it suggests to backup everything, recreate
the pv for the whole size, and then restore from backup.
Since you currently have plenty of free
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:19 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:08 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
It looks more like a workaround than a solution. If my non native
English understood it well, it suggests to backup everything,
recreate the pv for the
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:07:59 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
Since you currently have plenty of free space, you don't have to take
the system out of service to do a backup. Create a new PV in sda4 and
run pvmove, then remove and recreate the PV on sda3 and pvmove the
data back. Then you can
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:31:20 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:07:59 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
Since you currently have plenty of free space, you don't have to
take the system out of service to do a backup. Create a new PV in
sda4 and run pvmove,
I never said LVM would do data recovery or provide Data Integrity - thats the
job of the soft-RAID - though even that won't prevent PEBKAC errors (e.g.
delete file).
And LVM adds more than a 'little' complexity.
If I had just lost the drive, I would have known exactly what I had lost as I
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
thing I could find that was recently upgraded that may fit. It used to
be that if I was saving a file, picture or attachment in Seamonkey and
created a
Hi,
does anybody know about a patch to make lm_sensors work
with a PhenomII which uses AMD K10 for temperature sensing.
sensors-detect detects it but there is no config file for that
configuration.
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH -
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
thing I could find that was recently upgraded that may fit. It used to
be that if I was saving a file, picture or attachment in
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know about a patch to make lm_sensors work
with a PhenomII which uses AMD K10 for temperature sensing.
sensors-detect detects it but there is no config file for that
configuration.
Many
Has anyone any ideas? The syslog-ng is the usually the first line
reported by top:
4097 root 20 0 3120 1060 708 R 48.3 0.1 677:46.38 syslog-ng
The files in /var/log seem to be growing at an expected slow pace and
aren't reporting anything unexpected. I followed a 'howto' and have
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi group,
I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
Maxim
__
maxim wexler wrote:
Hi group,
I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
By keywording them. By default, portage only installed
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 17:08:
I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
These are the latest stable versions. If you
These are the latest stable versions. If you want testing
versions you
need to put the into /etc/portage/package.keywords [1].
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3chap=3
Nope,
Using the model given:
app-office/gnumeric ~x86
like this:
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 18:43:
Nope,
Using the model given:
app-office/gnumeric ~x86
like this:
=sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
in package.keywords, gives the same result as above.
No wonder =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 does not exist :-) With =
you set
=sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
Yeah, I just found this out and rushed back but you beat me to it:)
mw
__
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with the All-new Yahoo!
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Caveat: I have no idea why this doesn't work, but if you make sda4 an
extended partition and create sda5 as a logical with exactly the same start
and end as you describe above, you do in fact lose all data. Obviously
there is a difference between
On Monday 23 March 2009 21:27:15 Steve wrote:
Steve wrote:
destination sshguardproc {
program(/usr/local/sbin/sshguard
template($DATE $FULLHOST $MESSAGE\n));
};
The presence of the above line is definitely what triggers the excessive
CPU usage - it is almost as-if
* Steve (gentoo_...@shic.co.uk) [23.03.09 20:27]:
Steve wrote:
destination sshguardproc {
program(/usr/local/sbin/sshguard
template($DATE $FULLHOST $MESSAGE\n));
};
program() only takes 1 argument: the programname.
Any thing you want to pass, you have to define via a
Steve wrote:
Do others get this behaviour - is this a bug in syslog-ng?
Sorry for the multiple posts... a slight error on my part. The sshguard
process wasn't running - a /bin/sh process trying to spawn it was
running (there was no link from /usr/local... to the binary) and when
the binary
Sebastian Günther wrote:
program() only takes 1 argument: the programname.
There aren't two arguments (no comma) - and, yes, the syntax is odd -
but it is exactly what is given by the sshguard man page - and seems to
be confirmed by the syslog-ng manual, too.
BTW: Just curious: you do not
Alan McKinnon wrote:
In short: top lies,
On this occasion, top was telling the truth. ;)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Steve gentoo_...@shic.co.uk wrote:
Steve wrote:
Do others get this behaviour - is this a bug in syslog-ng?
Sorry for the multiple posts... a slight error on my part. The sshguard
process wasn't running - a /bin/sh process trying to spawn it was running
Hi group,
I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick and
install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on the CD is
v2.6.27 and therefore there is no Atheros driver for the eee's on-board wifi.
Can someone confirm this?
If true, can I simply add the
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 22:31:
I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick and
install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on the CD is
v2.6.27 and therefore there is no Atheros driver for the eee's on-board
wifi. Can someone confirm
Daniel Pielmeier schrieb am 23.03.2009 22:40:
You may want to take a look at the SystemRescueCd [1] afaik it is based
on gentoo and more up to date. It is also possible to install it on a
live-cd.
Of course I want to say. You can install it on an usb-stick :-)
signature.asc
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 18:43:
Nope,
Using the model given:
app-office/gnumeric ~x86
like this:
=sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
in package.keywords, gives the same result as above.
No wonder
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:40:30 +0100, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick
and install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on
the CD is v2.6.27 and therefore there is no Atheros driver for the
eee's on-board wifi. Can
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world
??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-)
Use an alias
2009/3/23 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com:
Oh, OK. Dale waves hand over head. If it is set up to add that
option, how do you tell it not to use it?
alias ls='/bin/ls --color'
alias l='ls -l'
With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your
environment), you can now use 'ls'
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world
??? Certainly a lot more
Man. Is this thread really going to continue??
On 3/23/09, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale
2009/3/24 Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0900, SOrCErEr wrote:
Hello,
My gentoo system has a problem.
It has not mounted sysfs while boot process.
I have to do mount sysfs by my hand now.
Of course, udev rc scripts has line of need sysfs. And
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
2009/3/23 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com:
Oh, OK. Dale waves hand over head. If it is set up to add that
option, how do you tell it not to use it?
alias ls='/bin/ls --color'
alias l='ls -l'
With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your
39 matches
Mail list logo
