Since few days ( two or three ?), every time I launch emerge, it's saying me
it needs an update of portage itself.
In plus, I have upgraded udev at least two times (160>161>162 today)...
Plus, I have had two warning message concerning updates : sudo and an other...
what's going on ? Is somebody
On 09/13/10 01:09, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/13/2010 12:41 AM, Joseph wrote:
Can someone refresh my memory how to emerge application pointing to
local source file?
I need to re-emerge: asterisk-addons-1.4.7
but it does not seems to exist on any mirror (I have in may make.conf),
I found aste
* Al wrote:
> Hope you have the power to go that way far enough on your own until it
> becomes interesting for more people.
Well, let's see where it goes. I'll continue my work and it
seems that soon a few others might jump in.
> I did good progress with Gentoo on Cygwin this WE. 3 big packages
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:13:28 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> The script has a list of packages which should be updated
> completely automatically, but *only* if they're pulled in as
> dependency (beginning from world), and others not in that list
> should *not* be updated.
Would piping emerge -pu
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:13 on Sunday 12 September 2010, Enrico
Weigelt did opine thusly:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I've got a tricky task for automatic update script, which requires
> some portage magic ...
>
> The script has a list of packages which should be updated
> completely automatic
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:09 on Monday 13 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
> On 09/13/2010 12:41 AM, Joseph wrote:
> > Can someone refresh my memory how to emerge application pointing to
> > local source file?
> > I need to re-emerge: asterisk-addons-1.4.7
> > but it d
>
> Just let the project grow. It does not require anyone jumping into
> it to stick with it for long time. All I'm proposing right now is
> adopt the model, which makes collaboration w/ other distros easier.
> It's something like an aggreement as FHS.
Hope you have the power to go that way far en
* Andrea Conti wrote:
> More importantly, code which is intended to be used in shared objects
> must be compiled with specific options as position-independent code,
> whereas code in an archive needs not.
Not necessarily. But it can't be shared at runtime anymore, since
the dynamic loader has to
* Al wrote:
> >> What is your strategia to build up a community?
> >
> > Actually, I don't really have any. All I can do is offering it
> > as OSS and do a little bit advocacy here and there - I don't
> > have the resources to build up real community structures all
> > alone. Of course, anybody's
Hi folks,
I've got a tricky task for automatic update script, which requires
some portage magic ...
The script has a list of packages which should be updated
completely automatically, but *only* if they're pulled in as
dependency (beginning from world), and others not in that list
should *not*
On 09/13/2010 12:41 AM, Joseph wrote:
Can someone refresh my memory how to emerge application pointing to
local source file?
I need to re-emerge: asterisk-addons-1.4.7
but it does not seems to exist on any mirror (I have in may make.conf),
I found asterisk-addons-1.4.7.tar.gz file but I need to p
Can someone refresh my memory how to emerge application pointing to local
source file?
I need to re-emerge: asterisk-addons-1.4.7
but it does not seems to exist on any mirror (I have in may make.conf), I found asterisk-addons-1.4.7.tar.gz file but I need to point emerge to local file
instead.
>
> What I am saying is that there is no way to dynamically load code from a
> .a file, at least not with the system tools, period.
>
O.K. so we have to stress the term archive in your statement.
Al
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > But that silly k3b returns
> > No optical drive found.
> > K3b did not find any optical device in your system.
> > Solution : Make sure HAL daemon is running, it is used by K3b for finding
> > devices.
> > and on the terminal
>
> Finally solved, a matter of per
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:27 on Sunday 12 September 2010,
meino.cra...@gmx.de did opine thusly:
> Hi,
>
> Do I shoot into my own feet when copying the /var/lib/world-file
> from my 32bit system to my 64bit system and doing a "emerge -e world"
> then, when logged into my 64bit system to
Mark Knecht [10-09-12 19:48]:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do I shoot into my own feet when copying the /var/lib/world-file
> > from my 32bit system to my 64bit system and doing a "emerge -e world"
> > then, when logged into my 64bit system to install the same s
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Do I shoot into my own feet when copying the /var/lib/world-file
> from my 32bit system to my 64bit system and doing a "emerge -e world"
> then, when logged into my 64bit system to install the same stuff ???
>
> best regards,
> mcc
>
It's OK t
On Sunday 12 September 2010 19:27:10 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do I shoot into my own feet when copying the /var/lib/world-file
> from my 32bit system to my 64bit system and doing a "emerge -e world"
> then, when logged into my 64bit system to install the same stuff ???
>
> best regard
Hi,
Do I shoot into my own feet when copying the /var/lib/world-file
from my 32bit system to my 64bit system and doing a "emerge -e world"
then, when logged into my 64bit system to install the same stuff ???
best regards,
mcc
On 09/11/2010 01:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The root user (sometimes portage) creates /usr/src/linux-*
Someone tell me again exactly how user alan is supposed to build those
sources?
From the kernel README:
To configure and build the kernel use:
cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.N
make O=/home
> So why shouldn't you be able to load an unshared lib (without PIC)
> dynamically? Sure there still would be some additional steps.
I am not talking specifically about PIC/non-PIC code here. PIC is
relevant because when you're doing dynamic loading you generally cannot
predict at what (virtual) a
>> This was actually a potential risk once upon a time:
>
> Sorry to drift from the topic, but would somebody please explain to me
> what a potential risk is? How does it differ from a risk?
A risk is always potential. A potential risk is when you are not sure
if it is a risk at all.
Al
On Sunday 12 September 2010 17:27:36 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> Selon alain.didierj...@free.fr:
> > Selon Mick :
> > > On Saturday 11 September 2010 17:01:29 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > > Selon Stéphane Guedon :
> > > > > Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free
> I agree there's no point in using sudo, but what's the problem? You
> don't need to edit the kernel sources merely to build a new kernel. You
> can build your kernel outside the tree using for example:
> make O=/home/user/kernel/tree/ menuconfig
> make O=/home/user/kernel/tree/
>
>
This is how I
J. Roeleveld [10-09-12 18:25]:
> On Sunday 12 September 2010 16:26:23 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently I am on the way to install a AMD64 root system.
> >
> > I use the AMD64 gentoo iso to boot into a 64bit system.
> > There was a net-connection without any problems (using DS
Selon alain.didierj...@free.fr:
> Selon Mick :
>
> > On Saturday 11 September 2010 17:01:29 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > Selon Stéphane Guedon :
> > > > Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free.fr a écrit
> :
> > > > > Selon Stroller :
> > > > > > On 6 Sep 2010, at 09:
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 16:26 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> I use the AMD64 gentoo iso to boot into a 64bit system.
> There was a net-connection without any problems (using DSL and dhcp).
>
> After several steps I chrooted into the new environment and ...
> no net anymore. eth0 was up (ifconfi
On Sunday 12 September 2010 16:26:23 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently I am on the way to install a AMD64 root system.
>
> I use the AMD64 gentoo iso to boot into a 64bit system.
> There was a net-connection without any problems (using DSL and dhcp).
>
> After several steps I chroot
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:26 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> currently I am on the way to install a AMD64 root system.
>
> I use the AMD64 gentoo iso to boot into a 64bit system.
> There was a net-connection without any problems (using DSL and dhcp).
>
> After several steps I chrooted into the new environ
Hi,
currently I am on the way to install a AMD64 root system.
I use the AMD64 gentoo iso to boot into a 64bit system.
There was a net-connection without any problems (using DSL and dhcp).
After several steps I chrooted into the new environment and ...
no net anymore. eth0 was up (ifconfig) but
Dan Johansson writes:
> On Sunday 12 September 2010 12.11:14 Dan Johansson wrote:
>> Yesterday my ~x86 Gentoo box got KDE upgraded to 4.5.1 and today portage
>> want to downgrade it again to 4.4.5 and I can not figure out why.
>>
>> My "emerge --update --deep --verbose --reinstall changed-use wo
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
> I also cannot evaluate the real impact the position of the /-partition
> on the harddisk has on system performance. I read about it years ago
> and since than I always put the partitions always in the sequence of
> "boot","swap","root","home" onto the harddisks. May b
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:16:31 +0100 Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sunday 12 September 2010 00:15:34 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
>
> > But since you're not convinced, now it would be nice, for my own
> > education, and perhaps someone else's, that you elaborated a bit
> > more. What exactly do you find non
On Sunday 12 September 2010 12.11:14 Dan Johansson wrote:
> Yesterday my ~x86 Gentoo box got KDE upgraded to 4.5.1 and today portage
> want to downgrade it again to 4.4.5 and I can not figure out why.
>
> My "emerge --update --deep --verbose --reinstall changed-use world
> --pretend" gives a lot o
> You can't link dynamically against a library archive, so all DL code on
Don't you contradict
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/introduction.html with
this?
Practically you never do. But could, if you really wanted?
AFAIK you need PIC only to share libs in memory. The rest is already
Yesterday my ~x86 Gentoo box got KDE upgraded to 4.5.1 and today portage want
to downgrade it again to 4.4.5 and I can not figure out why.
My "emerge --update --deep --verbose --reinstall changed-use world --pretend"
gives a lot of output for KDE-components like this:
On Sunday 12 September 2010 00:15:34 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> But since you're not convinced, now it would be nice, for my own
> education, and perhaps someone else's, that you elaborated a bit
> more. What exactly do you find non convincing in that usage of the
> adjective? How would you express th
On Sunday 12 September 2010 01:15:56 walt wrote:
> On 09/11/2010 11:24 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
> >> Deselect that which is deprecated and will be removed soon
> >
> > I hope it won't. I have one box whose drives the new drivers cannot
> > de
Le Saturday 11 September 2010 22:52:09, walt a écrit :
> On 09/11/2010 02:13 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > synce few days, I have a message of portage suggestiung me to use the
> > "static- libs" USE flag for media-libs/jpeg-6b.
> >
> > What may be the consequence ? Please be gentle with explaini
On 09/11/2010 12:13 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
synce few days, I have a message of portage suggestiung me to use the "static-
libs" USE flag for media-libs/jpeg-6b.
What may be the consequence ? Please be gentle with explaining this sorte of
things, as I have not the knowledges to understand the
> "DL libraries aren't really a different kind of library format (both
> static and shared libraries can be used as DL libraries);"
Library archives (.a) and shared objects (.so) differ in several ways.
Roughly speaking:
>From a file format perspective, .a files are simple collections (man ar)
of
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
>
> Some people, such as myself, use kernel sources outside of portage (I
> follow a git repo) and do so as a non-root user. In this case the
> kernel tree is not owned by root and the config/compile is easily done
> as a non-root user.
>
> If you are super-paranoi
42 matches
Mail list logo
