On 2011-03-24 22:37, Sebastian Günther wrote:
just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
You have been warned
Mostly
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:27 +0100, Jarry wrote:
I know, there is qfile with -o option, but its syntax is
not clear to me. I tried qfile -o * but that is apparently
not the correct syntax, as all I got were a few top-level
subdirectories and nothing more...
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know
On Thursday 24 March 2011 22:07:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing.
On Friday 25 March 2011 07:51:13 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 22:07:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as
On 2011/03/24 05:37PM, Sebastian Günther wrote:
Hi,
just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
Judging by the comment in
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
qfile operates on the files you give it, it doesn't recurse into
directories.
Try find / -xdev -type f -exec qfile -o {} +
Oh, thanks, now it is clear. I think man-page is a little confusing:
qfile -o does not find
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:33:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Naturally this returned a lot so we have to use common sense before
deleting something. That said, what about these:
/usr/bin/cc
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/c89
/usr/bin/gcc
/usr/bin/gcov
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-c++
I think these are
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:33:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Naturally this returned a lot so we have to use common sense before
deleting something. That said, what about these:
/usr/bin/cc
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/c89
/usr/bin/gcc
/usr/bin/gcov
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-c++
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-)
I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:33:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
That gcc one bugs me tho. It's in /usr/bin but doesn't belong to a
package. Just blows my mind, which ain't much right now. lol I got
to get better meds.
Remember that gcc-config sets which version is called when you run gcc,
so it must
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:37:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python
2.7?
I install 2.7 on August 10th and removed 2.6 on October 5th.
--
Neil Bothwick
Documentation: (n.) a novel sold with software, designed to entertain the
I keep on getting sense error 2/30/05 when trying to burn the livecd
on my new dvd burner, and I've tried with various discs. Is the burner
at fault? Google isn't of much help.
I did python-updater as said by the ebuild.
After it I did emerge -a --depclean which removed python 2.6
Boy I was I happy that I have daily backups.
portage did not work anymore.
Changing the active python version before running python-updater gives a lot
more packages. I did portage by hand.
In /var/log/ there is a file wtmp , which is 24 MB owned by utmp .
It is in binary format is updated when I reboot.
Can anyone explain what it's for whether it cb safely deleted ?
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,
this file stores previous login sessions since the system existed.
It's OK to delete that file if only for regular use.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
In /var/log/ there is a file wtmp , which is 24 MB owned by utmp .
It is in binary format is
Philip Webb writes:
In /var/log/ there is a file wtmp , which is 24 MB owned by utmp
. It is in binary format is updated when I reboot.
Can anyone explain what it's for whether it cb safely deleted ?
It tracks logins, you can use the 'last' command to show its contents. I'm
pretty
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:37:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python
2.7?
I install 2.7 on August 10th and removed 2.6 on October 5th.
--
Neil Bothwick
Do you recollect
110325 Alex Schuster wrote:
Philip Webb writes:
In /var/log/ there is a file wtmp , which is 24 MB owned by utmp
. It is in binary format is updated when I reboot.
Can anyone explain what it's for whether it cb safely deleted ?
It tracks logins, you can use the 'last' command to show
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Andrey Vul andrey@gmail.com wrote:
I keep on getting sense error 2/30/05 when trying to burn the livecd
on my new dvd burner, and I've tried with various discs. Is the burner
at fault? Google isn't of much help.
That code means:
CANNOT WRITE MEDIUM .
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:56:20 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I installed 2.7 on August 10th and removed 2.6 on October 5th.
--
Neil Bothwick
Do you recollect whether you ran python-updater immediately after the
2.7 emerge, and do you remember whether you set 2.7 as your active
version
On 3/25/2011 5:33 AM, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:33:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Naturally this returned a lot so we have to use common sense before
deleting something. That said, what about these:
/usr/bin/cc
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/c89
/usr/bin/gcc
Mark Knecht (Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:56:20 -0700):
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:37:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python
2.7?
I install 2.7 on August 10th and removed 2.6
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
110325 Alex Schuster wrote:
Philip Webb writes:
In /var/log/ there is a file wtmp , which is 24 MB owned by utmp
. It is in binary format is updated when I reboot.
Can anyone explain what it's for whether it cb
Hi all,
I upgraded python2.6 to python2.7,
then i run eselect python set python2.7,
then python-updater.
Here is the python-updater output :
* Starting Python Updater...
* Main active version of Python: 2.7
* Active version of Python 2: 2.7
* Active version of Python 3: 3.1
*
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 3/25/2011 5:33 AM, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:33:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Naturally this returned a lot so we have to use common sense before
deleting something. That said, what about these:
/usr/bin/cc
/usr/bin/c++
Jacques Montier wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded python2.6 to python2.7,
then i run eselect python set python2.7,
then python-updater.
Here is the python-updater output :
* Starting Python Updater...
* Main active version of Python: 2.7
* Active version of Python 2: 2.7
* Active version
Roman Zilka wrote:
Mark Knecht (Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:56:20 -0700):
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:37:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python
2.7?
I
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.comwrote:
And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
think we want to break
Simon Siemonsma wrote:
I did python-updater as said by the ebuild.
After it I did emerge -a --depclean which removed python 2.6
Boy I was I happy that I have daily backups.
portage did not work anymore.
Changing the active python version before running python-updater gives a lot
more packages.
I noticed that recent versions of portage 2.1.9 create an ._unmerge_
directory in /var/tmp/portage. What is it used for?
Jacques Montier (Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:17:41 +0100):
Hi all,
I upgraded python2.6 to python2.7,
then i run eselect python set python2.7,
then python-updater.
Here is the python-updater output :
* Starting Python Updater...
* Main active version of Python: 2.7
* Active version of
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
Do you recollect
I don't recollect what I did seven days ago, let alone seven months.
Ah ha, TOO FUNNY.
(old man rolling on the floor
with tears rolling down his cheeks)
Still chuckling over this post 50 year old prose
hours later.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
I noticed that recent versions of portage 2.1.9 create an ._unmerge_
directory in /var/tmp/portage. What is it used for?
Looks like this is the new PKG_TMPDIR. I think this is patch that made
the change, with
Hello,
Background:
I use Thunderbird as my email client,
but the mail servers of another (my isp).
What I want is an email setup that interoperates
with encrypted emails from various unix and
windows based servers. (maybe dreaming here?)
So I'm research on interoperability
of eningmail, pgp,
On Friday 25 March 2011 01:28:35 Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version python be selected first as the active python
2 version and then
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:09:50 +0100, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
I think wicd rely on python 2.6 currently. This is my setup on my
laptop ! (trying other version break networking with wicd).
Wicd works fine with 2.7. There was a problem when 2,7 was first
released, but that was fixed in a Wicd
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:17:41 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
* Adding to list: dev-libs/boost:1.42
* check: manual [Added to list manually, see CHECKS in manpage for
more information.]
Do what it says. The man page explains manual checks and how to skip
them, that's why the output tells
Am 25.03.2011 19:51, schrieb James:
It's been a while since I set up a mail server, but,
if that (postfix) is what I need to do, then just tell
how (overview) the packages you'd use, or is this part of postfix?
Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the
client-side
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:09:23PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote:
Am 25.03.2011 19:51, schrieb James:
It's been a while since I set up a mail server, but,
if that (postfix) is what I need to do, then just tell
how (overview) the packages you'd use, or is this part of postfix?
Mail
Am 25.03.2011 22:13, schrieb Matt Harrison:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:09:23PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote:
Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the
client-side only. The mail server doesn't see the encryption,
encrypted mails contain only text, just like every
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:26:24PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote:
Am 25.03.2011 22:13, schrieb Matt Harrison:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:09:23PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote:
Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the
client-side only. The mail server doesn't see
Am 25.03.2011 22:48, schrieb Matt Harrison:
I believe it can encrypt as well, as long as they keys are supplied
previously for the
recipients.
That sounds interessting. I have to look into that.
Maybe that is something for the thread starter too.
Even stranger, you're the first person who
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
Jacques Montier (Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:17:41 +0100):
Hi all,
I upgraded python2.6 to python2.7,
then i run eselect python set python2.7,
then python-updater.
Here is the python-updater output :
* Starting Python Updater...
* Main active version of
46 matches
Mail list logo
