Hi All,
I am on Gentoo stable and in the past (Jun 9) I have built android
(gingerbread) successfully. Somehow now build fails at random places with the
following error.
/***/
*** glibc detected *** make: free():
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2011 11:06:32 AM randd wrote:
Hi All,
I am on Gentoo stable and in the past (Jun 9) I have built android
(gingerbread) successfully. Somehow now build fails at random places with
the following error.
On 07/10/2011 02:21 AM, Grant wrote:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with
On 07/13/2011 01:33 AM, Grant wrote:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2011 11:25:50 AM randd wrote:
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2011 11:06:32 AM randd wrote:
Hi All,
I am on Gentoo stable and in the past (Jun 9) I have built android
(gingerbread) successfully. Somehow now build fails at random places
with the following error.
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2011 08:13:27 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2011 02:21 AM, Grant wrote:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video
On 07/13/2011 03:25 PM, Mick wrote:
[...]
Is the [r600] gallium stable now? I found it was locking up a kde desktop with
effects enabled and set it back to classic.
It's been made the default driver in Mesa now. So I guess that means
it's considered stable. But for me, both classic and
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I need only one wireless card in my router to connect to both
the clients and a wireless bridge which is connected to the WAN?
I think you need 2 cards in your router (one as host and one as client
to the wireless WAN
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Grant,
another shot into an even much deeper dark ;)
May be you have a problem here, which it is called Brummschleife
in german...sorry dont know the English equivalent...may be something
like buzzing loop...but this looks more like a strange
Roger Mason rma...@mun.ca [11-07-13 18:12]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Grant,
another shot into an even much deeper dark ;)
May be you have a problem here, which it is called Brummschleife
in german...sorry dont know the English equivalent...may be something
like
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2011 15:42:02 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/13/2011 03:25 PM, Mick wrote:
[...]
Is the [r600] gallium stable now? I found it was locking up a kde
desktop with effects enabled and set it back to classic.
It's been made the default driver in Mesa now. So I guess that
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the new
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the new
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [11-07-13 19:20]:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same
Should I need only one wireless card in my router to connect to both
the clients and a wireless bridge which is connected to the WAN?
I think you need 2 cards in your router (one as host and one as client
to the wireless WAN bridge), unless you use WDS.
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news
Have you considered using PXE to network boot your systems? you can
have various configurations set up based on mac addresses to address
different hardware issues. I recommend trying out SystemRescueCD to
experiment with PXE booting for the client and server.
That sounds like exactly what I
On 07/13/2011 12:38 PM, Grant wrote:
I suppose I could also do without the PXE layer and all of its
requirements if I install some sort of minimal storage device (flash
drive, SD card, USB key, etc.) into each workstation for the boot
image. I could still push updates to the boot image over
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news because it means I can use any
802.11n PCIe 300Mbps card with Linux drivers instead of worrying about
AP mode. I'll just use a 802.11g card in AP mode until there is
better support for 802.11n. The router uses most of the bandwidth
from the WAN.
Hi
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news because it means I can use any
802.11n PCIe 300Mbps card with Linux drivers instead of worrying about
AP mode. I'll just use a 802.11g card in AP mode until there is
better support for 802.11n. The router uses most of the bandwidth
from the WAN.
Hi
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Its certainly counter-intuitive, but that's what I found when I
searched N configuration. I have had better than 54M bit rates
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Sorry - dont know how to tell if can use 2.4 and 5.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Sorry - dont know how to tell if can use 2.4 and 5.
It
I'm baakk. Anybody want to guess why? Come on, guess.
First one doesn't count.
OK. This thing ran for a while with no problems. I'm downloading a
video while I am watching TV. I use Firefox for that because it has
that download helper tool and I like it. I couldn't find it
24 matches
Mail list logo
