The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
The kernel modules are no better and no worse than any other
out-of-tree modules.
You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module means you turn the kernel to
tained crap because of the number of problems it
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
The kernel modules are no better and no worse than any other
out-of-tree modules.
You're wrong. Using the virtualbox
The 23/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module means you turn the kernel to
tained crap because of the number of problems it causes, including
random memory curruption.
Care to
I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
Please, disparage with details! ;-)
Thanks - Joseph
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 23/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, November 23, 2011 12:06 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
open-source version.
Except USB support.
Huh?
I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP guest to use a negatives
The 23/11/11, Joseph Davis wrote:
I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
Please, disparage with details! ;-)
I've already said random memory
On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote:
snipped
YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules just
work - performance is as good as vmware
I actually found VB to have better performance.
When using virtual machines, I tend to run multiple
On Wed, November 23, 2011 1:59 pm, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 23/11/11, Joseph Davis wrote:
I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
Please,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:50:08 -0600, Dale wrote:
Another LVM question. If I want to remove a drive and tell pvmove to
move the data off it, can the drive have files being written to it
while this is done? I'm wanting to use my old spare drive to move some
things around but right now LVM has
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
open-source version.
Except USB support.
Huh?
I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP guest to use a negatives scanner
that would refuse to work with Sane as
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
The kernel modules are no better and no worse
Am Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:34:45 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
open-source version.
Except USB support.
Huh?
I used VirtualBox with
The 23/11/11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I also got random memory corruption when compiling large packages with
simple kernel configurations and no out-of-tree modules present on the
system.
Do you have any evidence to proof that this randomness is actually caused
by VB modules and not something
On Wed, November 23, 2011 2:34 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
open-source version.
Except USB support.
Huh?
I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP guest to use a
On 2011-11-23, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wed, November 23, 2011 12:06 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
open-source version.
Except USB support.
Huh?
The last
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:51:19 -0800
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I use virtualbox
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:01:34 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote:
snipped
YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules
just work - performance is as good as vmware
I actually found VB to have
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets grant that the VirtualBox modules are not up to LKML standards.
That's fine, very little out of the tree is. I'm willing to bet that
the majority of the issues are silly bugs involving pointer arithmetic
(the
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice this entire thread has carefully steered around ESXi
Now there's an interesting product, with a truly fascinating licensing
and pricing model.
ESXi isn't Linux. Or, at least, it's not something you'd run
On Nov 23, 2011 10:32 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice this entire thread has carefully steered around ESXi
Now there's an interesting product, with a truly fascinating licensing
and pricing
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
-mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx --param l1-cache-size=32 --param
l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=8192
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
-mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT
430] (rev a1)
which I want to exchange with a MSI 560 Ti made also by msi.
I am using the nvidia-drivers...
Is it right, that is simple to pull out the old card
Am 23.11.2011 18:21, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF108 [GeForce
GT 430] (rev a1)
which I want to exchange with a MSI 560 Ti made also by msi.
I am using the
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net [11-11-23 18:48]:
Am 23.11.2011 18:21, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF108 [GeForce
GT 430] (rev a1)
which I want to exchange
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF108 [GeForce
GT 430] (rev a1)
which I want to exchange with a MSI 560 Ti made also by msi.
I am using the
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [11-11-23 19:00]:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GF108 [GeForce
GT 430] (rev a1)
which I want to exchange
Am 23.11.2011 18:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? --
### gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS=-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [11-11-23 19:00]:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Before I lock out myself from my Linux system...
Current state: VGA compatible controller: nVidia
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:50:08 -0600, Dale wrote:
Another LVM question. If I want to remove a drive and tell pvmove to
move the data off it, can the drive have files being written to it
while this is done? I'm wanting to use my old spare drive to move some
things around
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org [11-11-23 20:08]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de asks:
Is it right, that is simple to pull out the old card and insert the
new one or do I badly forget anything ?
Just be sure to shut the machine down before doing that. You might lock
yourself out for quite a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I'm just wondering, what are the benefits drawbacks of turning on
static USE flag for sys-boot/grub?
I seem to remember it has something to do with whether you're using
32bit vs 64bit, but I can't be certain.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org [11-11-23 20:08]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de asks:
Is it right, that is simple to pull out the old card and insert the
new one or do I badly forget anything ?
Just be sure to shut the machine down
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Pandu Poluanpa...@poluan.info wrote:
I'm just wondering, what are the benefits drawbacks of turning on
static USE flag for sys-boot/grub?
I seem to remember it has something to do with whether you're using
32bit vs 64bit, but I can't be
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I'm just wondering, what are the benefits drawbacks of turning on
static USE flag for sys-boot/grub?
I seem to remember it has something
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Fundamentally doesn't it build in any libraries, etc.? I don't know really.
I think, generally speaking, the static USE flag is mostly useful
for people who build initramfs and don't want dynamically linked
libraries
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:07:55 -0600, Dale wrote:
I think we have a problem:
root@fireball / # pvmove -v /dev/sdb1
Finding volume group data
Archiving volume group data metadata (seqno 4).
Creating logical volume pvmove0
Moving 59604 extents of logical volume data/data1
Am 23.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I'm just wondering, what are the benefits drawbacks of turning on
static USE flag for
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within the
last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and mtune=core2.
I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I
am more constrained by the fact
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connector
at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
ZZ
On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone
I am using rdiff-backup which is no longer maintained, but still seems
to work, but I was thinking to use rsnapshot instead which seems like a
nice way to do this, but this seems not to have been maintained for a
while, either, so I was wondering if anyone is using it and how it works
for you?
On Nov 24, 2011 5:13 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info
wrote:
I'm just wondering,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
You have space in the filesystem, but the volume containing that
filesystem is too large to move. You must first reduce the filesystem
size, with resize2fs or whatever suits your fs, then shrink the LV
with lvresize. That will free up enough extents to be able to fit them
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Nov 24, 2011 5:13 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
mailto:li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
mailto:paul.hartman%2bgen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Nov 24, 2011 5:13 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue,
Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
You have space in the filesystem, but the volume containing that
filesystem is too large to move. You must first reduce the filesystem
size, with resize2fs or whatever suits your fs, then shrink the LV
with lvresize. That will free up enough extents to be able
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [11-11-24 04:02]:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org [11-11-23 20:08]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de asks:
Is it right, that is simple to pull out the old card and insert the
new one or do I badly
Dale asks:
OK. Everyone duck, I been thinking on this and Neils info above. lol
This is what I sort of figured out and tell me where I am off here. I
have to reduce the file system, change the partition in cfdisk (?),
resize the lv, then reduce the vg, then I can run pvmove? After all
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 19:26 -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am using rdiff-backup which is no longer maintained, but still seems
to work, but I was thinking to use rsnapshot instead which seems like
a
nice way to do this, but this seems not to have been maintained for a
while, either,
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale asks:
OK. Everyone duck, I been thinking on this and Neils info above. lol
This is what I sort of figured out and tell me where I am off here. I
have to reduce the file system, change the partition in cfdisk (?),
resize the lv, then reduce the vg, then I can run
Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
If there is only one ... this results in one VGA-output only as well ...
and I need 2.
Hi,
After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which
prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of
message:
/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
/lib64/libcrypt.so.1)
There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing.
Fair enough. :)
ZZ
On Nov 24, 2011 12:25 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
If there is only one ...
On 2011-11-24, cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am using rdiff-backup which is no longer maintained, but still seems
to work, but I was thinking to use rsnapshot instead which seems like a
nice way to do this, but this seems not to have been maintained for a
while, either,
On 2011-11-24, Albert W. Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 19:26 -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am using rdiff-backup which is no longer maintained, but still seems
to work, but I was thinking to use rsnapshot instead which seems like
a
nice way to do this,
55 matches
Mail list logo
