On both my laptop and my wife's laptop, Chromium is reposting form
data if I click "back" to a form page or if the browser restores a tab
which is a form page. Actually refreshing a form page prompts me as
it should.
This is pretty dangerous and has caused me quite a few problems. I've
scoured G
> I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
> an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
> one of the brighter minds amongst us would put out a skeleton
> (wiki) information page as such:
>
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ZFS+RAID
>
> I kno
>>> turn off readahead. ZFS' own readahead and the kernel's clash - badly.
>>> Turn off kernel's readahead for a visible performance boon.
>> You are probably not talking about ZFS readahead but about the ARC.
>
> which does prefetching. So yes.
I'm taking notes on this so I want to clarify, when
>> Interesting news related to ZFS:
>>
>> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
>
> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
> future? May even be their intention?
I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel,
although some argue that it should be integra
"did "chmod 0600" now."
You just made it read+writable by just you - you're running ssh by you,
right?
I referred to the man page because I thought there would be something I
could just quote and learned something "Omitted digits are assumed to be
leading zeros." which makes sense, as I intuitive
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Interesting news related to ZFS:
>
> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
>
>
I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
future? May even be their intention?
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you underst
You dont happen to have a reasonable identical SD Card around, so you could dd
the image on to see whether this is card related, do you?
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 04:45:04 +0200
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> I did a binary image backup with dd of the sdcard.
Am 18.09.2013 21:01, schrieb Shawn Wilson:
> I was saying to chmod 000 it so that you're not picking up (possibly
> strange?) options.
and it is still readable then? never tried 000.
I was saying to chmod 000 it so that you're not picking up (possibly strange?)
options.
"Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 18.09.2013 20:03, schrieb Shawn Wilson:
>> Since the downgrade fixed your issue idk... but, what does your
>> authorized_keys look like? Also, move or chmod 0 your config to
Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
> "ssh -v" from my desktop hangs at:
I'm not sure what you are doing but some (vendor's) implemetations
of ssh, have a different set of priorities and order of negotiation,
particularly if the product you are trying to ssh into was based
on "funky code" o
Since the downgrade fixed your issue idk... but, what does your authorized_keys
look like? Also, move or chmod 0 your config to make sure nothing funny is
happening there.
"Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 18.09.2013 19:47, schrieb Joe Nyland:
>> Not sure why a downgraded openssh would improve
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 17:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 18/09/2013 16:05, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
> >> In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ...
> >
> > What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for
> > /var,
Am 18.09.2013 20:03, schrieb Shawn Wilson:
> Since the downgrade fixed your issue idk... but, what does your
> authorized_keys look like? Also, move or chmod 0 your config to make
> sure nothing funny is happening there.
authorized_keys looks very OK ... only my 2 keys in there ... untouched
for y
Am 18.09.2013 19:47, schrieb Joe Nyland:
> Not sure why a downgraded openssh would improve things for you if
> this is the issue, however I faced the same issue as yourself and it
> was caused by mDNS trying to do a reverse lookup on the host
> connecting in to the affected server, ultimately causi
On 18 Sep 2013, at 10:55, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 18.09.2013 11:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Rebuilt openssh already.
>>
>> Maybe I should downgrade for testing ...
>>
>> The problematic box: net-misc/openssh-6.2_p2-r4
>> The working box: net-misc/openssh-5.9_p1-r4
>
> Yep
Am 18.09.2013 11:56, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> turn off readahead. ZFS' own readahead and the kernel's clash - badly.
>> Turn off kernel's readahead for a visible performance boon.
> You are probably not talking about ZFS readahead but about the ARC.
>
> Jörg
>
w
Am 18.09.2013 09:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> rootfs on ZFS or "everything on ZFS" would have advantages, sure. No
> partitioning at all, resizeable zfs-filesystems for everything,
> checksums for everything ... you name it.
>
> In my case I have to decide until Sep, 25th -> installation d
On 18/09/2013 16:05, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ...
>
> What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for /var,
> /var/cache/squid and /usr/portage, and on my workstation for /u
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
> In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ...
What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for /var,
/var/cache/squid and /usr/portage, and on my workstation for /usr/portage and
/home/prh/.VirtualBox. It's never giv
Bruce Hill happypenguincomputers.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:11:33PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >
> > Is there a good place to read about these kinds of tuning parameters?
>
> Just wondering if anyone experienced running ZFS on Gentoo finds this wiki
> article worthy of use: http:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:34:12 +0800, 东方巽雷 wrote:
> ext4?btrfs or reiserfs?
tmpfs is you have the RAM. Otherwise ext2 would be a good bet, you don't
need journalling or large file support for compilation.
--
Neil Bothwick
I'll never forget the 1st time I ran Windows, but I'm trying...
signatu
ext4?btrfs or reiserfs?
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> turn off readahead. ZFS' own readahead and the kernel's clash - badly.
> Turn off kernel's readahead for a visible performance boon.
You are probably not talking about ZFS readahead but about the ARC.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg S
Am 18.09.2013 11:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Rebuilt openssh already.
>
> Maybe I should downgrade for testing ...
>
> The problematic box: net-misc/openssh-6.2_p2-r4
> The working box: net-misc/openssh-5.9_p1-r4
Yep. Downgrading works for me.
I am fiddling with accessing a server ...
"ssh -v" from my desktop hangs at:
# ssh -v $HOSTIP
OpenSSH_6.2p2-hpn14v1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
debug1: Reading configuration data /root/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Connecting to *edited*
debug1: fd 3
Am 17.09.2013 11:59, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Does anyone know how I get the "date"-extension into my gentoo-based
> cyrus-imapd-server?
anyone ... ?
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:22:29 -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone experienced running ZFS on Gentoo finds this
> wiki article worthy of use: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ZFS
Yes, it is useful. However I have recently stopped using the option to
built ZFS into the kernel as I ran int
Am 18.09.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
>> I have to set up a server w/ 8x 1TB in about 2 weeks and consider ZFS as
>> well, at least for data. So root-fs would go onto 2x 1TB hdds with
>> conventional partitioning and something like ext4.
>
> Is a layout like this with the data on ZFS and the root-fs
Hello,
If anybody is interested this howto appears it explains how to Install
Gentoo on ZFS Root.
https://github.com/ryao/zfs-overlay/blob/master/zfs-install
29 matches
Mail list logo
