On 30/12/2013 09:51, Edward M wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:42:33 -0700
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
After recent upgrade when I mount my USB and try as root:
chown joseph:users /media/stick/Ancient-Electricity_new.ppt
chown: changing ownership of
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:38:03 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/12/2013 09:51, Edward M wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:42:33 -0700
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
After recent upgrade when I mount my USB and try as root:
chown joseph:users
Good morning everyone,
Came in this morning to a server with a non-running apache...
It did restart ok, but when I checked the error log, I found this:
[Mon Dec 30 03:10:02 2013] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing
restart
[Mon Dec 30 03:10:02 2013] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor:
On 2013-12-29 1:39 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, I'm setting up a new server, and I'd like to rethink my iptables rules.
I'd like to start with something fairly simple:
1. Allow connections
On 30/12/2013 12:47, Tanstaafl wrote:
Good morning everyone,
Came in this morning to a server with a non-running apache...
It did restart ok, but when I checked the error log, I found this:
[Mon Dec 30 03:10:02 2013] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing
restart
[Mon Dec 30
Hi list,
For a few weeks now I've been having trouble emerging certain packages: they
abort on checksum failure every time. Yet when I wget them myself from the
first mirror in the list they're fine. Eh?
The problem can't be the presence of a distfile that's been renamed
*_checksum_failure_*
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
[-- LE SNIP --]
Ok, well, maybe I should have posted my entire ruleset...
I have this above where I define my chains:
#
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
#
Does it matter where
On 2013-12-30 6:30 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
To see what's going on, run ldd on:
/usr/lib64/apache2/modules/libphp5.s
Result:
# ldd /usr/lib64/apache2/modules/libphp5.so
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for
`/usr/lib64/apache2/modules/libphp5.so'
Minor additions to what Pandu said...
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The numbers within [brackets] are statistics/countes. Just replace
them with [0:0], unless you really really
Replies inter-posted
On 30/12/2013 14:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-12-30 6:30 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
To see what's going on, run ldd on:
/usr/lib64/apache2/modules/libphp5.s
Result:
# ldd /usr/lib64/apache2/modules/libphp5.so
ldd: warning: you do not have
Em 29-12-2013 20:35, Alan McKinnon escreveu:
On 29/12/2013 17:54, Zhu wrote:
Em 29-12-2013 11:47, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen escreveu:
Zhu zhushaz...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hello, every time that i try to made a emerge -uDN world, metasploit
jump in the process installation. I've check and there
On 2013-12-30 7:40 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Doesn't mean anything to me though... ;)
It's just a list of the libs a file knows it is linked to.
First is the lib name then the big arrow (=) then the file containing
that lib then a bunch of numbers. Ignore the
I currently set my RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to:
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 ruby21
World is updated.
But ruby21 profile can't be selected with eselect:
$ eselect ruby list
Available Ruby profiles:
[1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) *
If I remove ruby20 from RUBY_TARGETS, there would be no profiles left.
131230 James wrote:
Philip Webb purslow at ca.inter.net writes:
Yesterday I did my usual Sat system update, emerging new versions of
libassuan HTTP-Cookies dialog curl coreutils binutils procps virtual/man .
Today after restarting the system, mail continues to be downloaded normally,
my
On 12/30/13 10:38, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
I too ran the chown command on my USB flash and got the same
response as you did:
localhost001 media # chown cru:users flash-drive1/
chown: changing ownership of ‘flash-drive1/’: Operation not
permitted
drwxr-xr-x
2013/12/30 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com:
On 12/30/13 10:38, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
I too ran the chown command on my USB flash and got the same
response as you did:
localhost001 media # chown cru:users flash-drive1/
chown: changing ownership of ‘flash-drive1/’:
Am Sonntag, 29.12.2013 um 21:12
schrieb Joseph syscon...@gmail.com:
For some reason or another the system doesn't like my fstab entry:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickauto
noauto,rw,users 0 0
AFAIK the option to permit user mount is user and not users. Could
this cause the problem?
On 12/30/13 17:36, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
[snip]
With the line in fstab:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickautonoauto,rw,users
0 0
Some USB stick are mounted as root:root and I can not change that even as
root.
When I remove this like from fstab.
The USB stick are mounting
shawn wilson ag4ve.us at gmail.com writes:
Also see nftables: http://netfilter.org/projects/nftables/
Interesting read.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Netfilter-packet-flow.svg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Netfilter-components.svg
Where is the
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 07:42:33PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
After recent upgrade when I mount my USB and try as root:
chown joseph:users /media/stick/Ancient-Electricity_new.ppt
chown: changing ownership of ‘/media/stick/Ancient-Electricity_new.ppt’:
Operation not permitted
file ownership
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
shawn wilson ag4ve.us at gmail.com writes:
Also see nftables: http://netfilter.org/projects/nftables/
Interesting read.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Netfilter-packet-flow.svg
Greetings;
This should be simple, I've done it before, yet googling hasn't landed
me the correct answer yet. I've killed exiting config files to start
over and applied assorted wrong answers.
How does one get MC to exit in the current working directory instead of
the directory it started in?
Ok, my google-fu has failed me...
I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS
mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND outbound,
and it is the outbound I'm having trouble with).
This is for NFS CLIENT... I'm mounting NFS shares from my remote QNAP
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, my google-fu has failed me...
I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS
mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND outbound,
and it is the outbound I'm having trouble with).
Why don't you just use
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:27:19PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, my google-fu has failed me...
I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS
mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND outbound,
On 2013-12-30 3:27 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, my google-fu has failed me...
I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS
mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Why don't you just use NFSv4?
NFSv4 was designed to interact well with firewalls.
Jörg
It just so happens that I'm setting up NFS atm using this guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NFSv4
This info unfortunately misses the port number:
On the last update, there was an explanation of how to do this either in
postinstall or man pages.
I'm not near my puter, but will reply with more specifics once I can read
the logs.
On Dec 30, 2013 12:09 PM, Skippy linux...@204eastsouth.com wrote:
Greetings;
This should be simple, I've done
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Skippy linux...@204eastsouth.com wrote:
Greetings;
This should be simple, I've done it before, yet googling hasn't landed
me the correct answer yet. I've killed exiting config files to start
over and applied assorted wrong answers.
How does one get MC to
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:04:29PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
It just so happens that I'm setting up NFS atm using this guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NFSv4
This info unfortunately misses the port number: 2049
What do you mean by
On 12/30/2013 02:44 PM, David Abbott wrote:
From the ebuild elog;
LOG: postinst
To enable exiting to latest working directory,
put this into your ~/.bashrc:
. /usr/libexec/mc/mc.sh
HTH :)
Yes, I knew I was doing something stupid. I tried that, but I forgot
the . in from of it.
On Monday 30 December 2013 15:25:02 Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, my google-fu has failed me...
I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS
mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND outbound,
and it is the outbound I'm having trouble with).
This is for
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:44:45 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
preserved-rebuild should just take care of all this automagically.
Do you have preserve-libs in FEATURES?
Nope... is this now recommended? Is it the default on new installs?
Yes it's the default for new installs and comes highly
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:52:56 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason or another the system doesn't like my fstab entry:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickauto
noauto,rw,users 0 0
AFAIK the option to permit user mount is user and not users. Could
this cause the problem?
Am Dienstag, 31.12.2013 um 01:38
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:52:56 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason or another the system doesn't like my fstab entry:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickauto
noauto,rw,users 0 0
AFAIK the
I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is generated some ugly view pops up that is using monospace fonts impossible to read and it looks
ugly on a print out.
Is there a solution to it?
--
Joseph
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:38:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is generated
some ugly view pops up that is using monospace fonts impossible to read and
it looks
ugly on a print out.
Is there a solution to it?
How about giving a link
On 12/30/13 22:03, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:38:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is generated some ugly view
pops up that is using monospace fonts impossible to read and it looks
ugly on a print out.
Is there a solution
I haven't updated my portage tree for a while.
I tried to update recently but got some conflicts. So I removed some
packages manually.
This didnt' solve the issue. So I decided to remove all the masked
packages that I unmasked.
To do so, I moved package.mask and package.accept_keyword, and did a
39 matches
Mail list logo
